"Non-vetted" ??? Everyone one of them has been fact checked and proven wrong and the sources of the REAL facts are listed. Do you really want to be known as someone who would prefer to believe lies than face reality? Like I told Mike, it's going to hurt your arguments in the long run.
The number of people attending the inauguration is not a "subjective opinion," nor are "thousands" of Muslims in New Jersey cheering 9-11. Trump's math skills suck or he says whatever bullshit fits his argument regardless if it's accurate.
In your opinion, how many people attended president Trump's inauguration? I know there certainly was a lot of people there despite the violent terrorist attacks, Clinton supporters blocking access to the mall and the cold January rain. The place was packed.
If you are seriously going to try to relitigate this, you'll have to argue it with someone else. It has been looked into, the facts have been established. Sorry.
All the news Fit to print
Your concession is respectfully accepted.
Shove it right up your dishonest ass.
Of course he didn't say that.
No thanks. Just leave it up your desperate ass where it belongs.
When a poster won't engage it doesn't give you a "win." Do you move your pawns when no one is looking, too?
You are dodging the question again.
Look it up if you need the answer. I already did.
The statements have all been fact checked elsewhere, which I'm sure you know. No, I don't take the NYT at their word in an opinion piece. No one is supposed to.
