NY Times: Garland Would Make Court Most Liberal in Decades

Any Democrat is going to make the court more liberal than it has been decades for the simple reason that there has been a Republican majority going back to the 80s.
 
The Democrats/Socialists/Communists/Progressives have debased this once great Nation to the least common denominator. Keep America poor, uneducated, and poverty-stricken. Therein lie the votes.
 
Fuck the Liberal vagina. Tear the Democrat anus apart with the spear of the cock American pride. Skull rip progressives asinder. Boil socialist alive. Get the fuck off of the lawn of America you twisted fucks.
 
very interesting article and the graphs were very enlightening, the last thing the United States of America needs now is a liberliar SCJ!!!!!!!!
 
Here is how you can tell the GOP is full of shit:

Republican and Democratic sources tell NPR, however, that Republicans, through back channels to the White House, let it be known that if the Democrats prevail in the November presidential election, the GOP would help get Garland confirmed in the two months before the new president takes office on the theory that Garland is less liberal than anyone they think a President Clinton or Sanders would appoint.

Think about that for a moment.

If Clinton or Sanders win the election, the Republicans will help Obama get Garland confirmed because he is less liberal than someone Clinton or Sanders would appoint.

Now ask yourself: How does that fucking square with their bullshit that a President shouldn't appoint a Justice in the last 12 months of his Presidency? They are prepared to appoint one in his last TWO months.

So now their bullshit excuse is EXPLODED.
 
Big gamble by the GOP in not doing their job. Dems have a good shot at the presidency and and a reasonable shot at regaining control of the senate.
If I don't do my job, or tell my boss I'll get around to it sometime next year, I'd be fired as would the rest of you.
 
Fuck the Liberal vagina. Tear the Democrat anus apart with the spear of the cock American pride. Skull rip progressives asinder. Boil socialist alive. Get the fuck off of the lawn of America you twisted fucks.

very powerful, interesting and truthful speech there fellow patriot..., an right to the..... point!!!!!
 
"NY Times: Garland Would Make Court Most Liberal in Decades"

A court that would follow the Constitution and its case law:

Constitutional case law that protects the privacy rights of women.

Constitutional case law that protects the equal protection rights of gay Americans.

Constitutional case law that protects the voting rights of minorities.

Constitutional case law that protects the due process rights of immigrants.

Constitutional case law that protects the religious liberty of all Americans.

And Constitutional case law that protects necessary, proper regulatory policy as authorized by the Commerce Clause – to protect the environment, the health and safety of working Americans, and the well-being of consumers.

Indeed, given this settled, accepted case law, justices who follow Constitutional jurisprudence are the conservatives, such as Judge Garland, and those who oppose it radicals and extremists, hostile to the protected liberties of Americans, and hostile to the Constitution and its case law.
 
So now their bullshit excuse is EXPLODED
are you really this funny or just in front of the entire USMB family ??

Really? This is all you have in the face of the truth?

Please explain how your head does not explode from cognitive dissonance at the blazing contradiction.

Oh, that's right. It helps to be retarded.
 
Here is how you can tell the GOP is full of shit:

Republican and Democratic sources tell NPR, however, that Republicans, through back channels to the White House, let it be known that if the Democrats prevail in the November presidential election, the GOP would help get Garland confirmed in the two months before the new president takes office on the theory that Garland is less liberal than anyone they think a President Clinton or Sanders would appoint.

Think about that for a moment.

If Clinton or Sanders win the election, the Republicans will help Obama get Garland confirmed because he is less liberal than someone Clinton or Sanders would appoint.

Now ask yourself: How does that fucking square with their bullshit that a President shouldn't appoint a Justice in the last 12 months of his Presidency? They are prepared to appoint one in his last TWO months.

So now their bullshit excuse is EXPLODED.
You're kind of bad at this political strategy thingy, arentcha?
 

Forum List

Back
Top