NY Times admits it wrote FAKE story

[dudmuck]

Most people can recognize the New York Times as fake news. It gets tougher to identify the less well known hacks.

it actually is a true story. Haley did spend $50k for curtains. NYT did a bad job on reporting it, but such spending is absurd regardless.

 

[Windparadox]

Does this prove bias?https://www.amazon.com/Bias-Insider-Exposes-Media-Distort/dp/0060520841&tag=ff0d01-20?tag=usmb-20Someone who worked for CBS news for 3 decades explains in great detail how the media distort the news.

`
There are tens of thousands of new books put out each year. I only have time to completely read a handful of them. Alas, your book is not on that list.
`

 

[healthmyths]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

oddly enough.....it really pisses me off that they wrote a fake story....

yet.....fox news and conservatives have been found guilty of that very same crime MANY TIMES and it doesn't bother me at all........

does that make me an arsehole?

Can you prove that fox news guilty of same crime "MANY TIMES"????
That's like Kerry saying because ONE US soldier wired a vietcong's testicles ALL US soldiers did the same thing!

"MANY TIMES"???

 

[healthmyths]

Most people can recognize the New York Times as fake news. It gets tougher to identify the less well known hacks.

it actually is a true story. Haley did spend $50k for curtains. NYT did a bad job on reporting it, but such spending is absurd regardless.

Where is YOUR proof because HERE is what the NYT reported as their correction!
Exact words..

An earlier version of this article and headline created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question,” wrote The Times in its correction on Friday.
“While Nikki R. Haley is the current ambassador to the United Nations, the decision on leasing the ambassador’s residence and purchasing the curtains was made during the Obama administration, according to current and former officials. T
he article should not have focused on Ms. Haley, nor should a picture of her have been used.
The article and headline have now been edited to reflect those concerns, and the picture has been removed.”

New York Times Issues Correction For Throwing ‘Unfair’ Curtain Shade at Nikki Haley

AGAIN where is YOUR proof?

 

[Uncensored2008]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

Still they achieved their goal of smearing her. It's how these demagogues operate.

 

[Uncensored2008]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

They corrected an error. That's what responsible news organizations do.

It wasn't an error. It was s lie. And to publish such a lie is libel...at the very least.

Bullshit. It was a mistake. Why else would they correct it?

It was no mistake, it was libel. This is how you Stalinist demagogues operate, creep.

 

[francoHFW]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

Still they achieved their goal of smearing her. It's how these demagogues operate.

So you found this retraction and good journalism, one mistake. Meanwhile everything the Republican base knows about Hillary the Foundation the FBI holder lerner etc etc is fake news that never gets retracted. GOP dupes live on An imaginary planet of hate and ignorance.

 

[Uncensored2008]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

Still they achieved their goal of smearing her. It's how these demagogues operate.

So you found this retraction and good journalism, one mistake. Meanwhile everything the Republican base knows about Hillary the Foundation the FBI holder lerner etc etc is fake news that never gets retracted. GOP dupes live on An imaginary planet of hate and ignorance.

The Times is an advocacy source, they are not journalists.

In this case they flat out lied, blatantly and with malice. Because they would be rightfully sued they printed the tepid retraction, knowing that the slander and libel had already been widely spread by the democrat hate networks.

 

[Markle]

2 university studies found that the #1 source for fake news is FOX.
read:STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All

So much for any credibility!

 

[Markle]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

At least they have the integrity to admit when they were wrong. Unlike Trump.

ONCE, AFTER the damage has been done.

Whoop-de-do!

 

[Markle]

Lies from FOX? These 50 are a good starting point.
The fact-checks behind 'The Daily Show's' 50 Fox news 'lies'

I couldn't make this up!

Citing the COMEDY CHANNEL, and a COMEDY SHOW, as FACT. That's just funny!

 

[francoHFW]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

oddly enough.....it really pisses me off that they wrote a fake story....

yet.....fox news and conservatives have been found guilty of that very same crime MANY TIMES and it doesn't bother me at all........

does that make me an arsehole?

Can you prove that fox news guilty of same crime "MANY TIMES"????
That's like Kerry saying because ONE US soldier wired a vietcong's testicles ALL US soldiers did the same thing!

"MANY TIMES"???

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

Still they achieved their goal of smearing her. It's how these demagogues operate.

So you found this retraction and good journalism, one mistake. Meanwhile everything the Republican base knows about Hillary the Foundation the FBI holder lerner etc etc is fake news that never gets retracted. GOP dupes live on An imaginary planet of hate and ignorance.

The Times is an advocacy source, they are not journalists.

In this case they flat out lied, blatantly and with malice. Because they would be rightfully sued they printed the tepid retraction, knowing that the slander and libel had already been widely spread by the democrat hate networks.

In the whole world only Fox News, Murdoch newspapers, and Rush Limbaugh Etc garbage demagogues agree with you, brainwashed functional moron. As far as the rest of the world goes, you people are laughing stock and and horror.

 

[Markle]

My opinion is that the msm, is very, very biased in favor of dems, and against republicans.

That doesn't prove bias, it proves that there are some people employed by the media that contribute to parties and people you don't like.
`

 

[francoHFW]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

At least they have the integrity to admit when they were wrong. Unlike Trump.

ONCE, AFTER the damage has been done.

Whoop-de-do!

What damage? This is a tiny story that people know about only because the GOP propaganda machine brainwashes you idiots with it. Retracted immediately to boot as as usual with real media with journalists. You wouldn't understand, super duper.

 

[frigidweirdo]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

It's not fake news. This is what annoys me about people who shout "fake news" as soon as possible.

Yes, the news article insinuated something it shouldn't have done. But it didn't say anything that was fake.

Not only that, the NY times has come out and said it was wrong to do what it did. That's responsible journalism.

Far more responsible than half the people on here, and FAR MORE RESPONSIBLE than someone saying this is FAKE NEWS.

Haha.... wow that is dumb.
You ever hear of the phrase "lie by omission"?
This is what NYT does all the time.

THE NEW YORK TIMES
HEADLINE: " FRIGIDWEIRDO WEARS HIS MOTHERS PANTIES"
To be followed by 6 paragraphs of various comments, "some are saying..." "from what we have heard...."
To be followed by 2 more paragraphs of like stories.





and then.... way at the bottom... Frigidweirdo was not available for comment, it might be true that he only wore the same brand of undergarments as his mother.

Think about the wording of "fake news". "Fake news" isn't lying by omission. They're two different things. This is the point here.

You say it's dumb to say what I'm saying, but it's like a New Yorker saying someone from New Jersey is stupid and then being accused of racism. It's just not racism. It might not be a nice thing to do, but the label being attached is the WRONG LABEL.

 

[Markle]

Most people can recognize the New York Times as fake news. It gets tougher to identify the less well known hacks.

it actually is a true story. Haley did spend $50k for curtains. NYT did a bad job on reporting it, but such spending is absurd regardless.

Where is YOUR proof because HERE is what the NYT reported as their correction!
Exact words..

An earlier version of this article and headline created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question,” wrote The Times in its correction on Friday.
“While Nikki R. Haley is the current ambassador to the United Nations, the decision on leasing the ambassador’s residence and purchasing the curtains was made during the Obama administration, according to current and former officials. T
he article should not have focused on Ms. Haley, nor should a picture of her have been used.
The article and headline have now been edited to reflect those concerns, and the picture has been removed.”

New York Times Issues Correction For Throwing ‘Unfair’ Curtain Shade at Nikki Haley

AGAIN where is YOUR proof?

The problem, as you know, is that the story appeared with a large type headling on their front page. The statement that they lied, appeared hours later after millions of people shared or forwarded the story. The admission that they lied will have appeared on page 11-c, below the fold in small type.

 

[candycorn]

New York Times admits creating 'unfair impression' about Nikki Haley's $53G curtains that were OK'd by Obama administration

Shocked they are saying what they wrote was BS!

It's not fake news. This is what annoys me about people who shout "fake news" as soon as possible.

Yes, the news article insinuated something it shouldn't have done. But it didn't say anything that was fake.

Not only that, the NY times has come out and said it was wrong to do what it did. That's responsible journalism.

Far more responsible than half the people on here, and FAR MORE RESPONSIBLE than someone saying this is FAKE NEWS.

Thanks. I saw the OP and just assumed it was totally made up. Good job.

 

[candycorn]

Most people can recognize the New York Times as fake news. It gets tougher to identify the less well known hacks.

it actually is a true story. Haley did spend $50k for curtains. NYT did a bad job on reporting it, but such spending is absurd regardless.

Where is YOUR proof because HERE is what the NYT reported as their correction!
Exact words..

An earlier version of this article and headline created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question,” wrote The Times in its correction on Friday.
“While Nikki R. Haley is the current ambassador to the United Nations, the decision on leasing the ambassador’s residence and purchasing the curtains was made during the Obama administration, according to current and former officials. T
he article should not have focused on Ms. Haley, nor should a picture of her have been used.
The article and headline have now been edited to reflect those concerns, and the picture has been removed.”

New York Times Issues Correction For Throwing ‘Unfair’ Curtain Shade at Nikki Haley

AGAIN where is YOUR proof?

The problem, as you know, is that the story appeared with a large type headling on their front page. The statement that they lied, appeared hours later after millions of people shared or forwarded the story. The admission that they lied will have appeared on page 11-c, below the fold in small type.

And Trump’s admission about all of his lies? Where have they appeared?

 

[Markle]

And Trump’s admission about all of his lies? Where have they appeared?

Is President Donald Trump news outlet?

He exaggerates, so what?

It makes no difference, whatsoever to neither your nor I. What frosts your behind is that he is DOING what he promised during the campaign and, even worse, it is working and he is successful!

Relax, take a deep breath. After a while, you'll become comfortable with America our economy and foreign policy working smoothly as it should.

Do you think we'll have 4.0+ GDP this quarter? Will we still have more jobs than workers?

 

[candycorn]

And Trump’s admission about all of his lies? Where have they appeared?

He exaggerates, so what?

Most people do not enjoy being lied to. Your enjoying it speaks to your complete lack of character.