It's not fake news. This is what annoys me about people who shout "fake news" as soon as possible.
Yes, the news article insinuated something it shouldn't have done. But it didn't say anything that was fake.
Not only that, the NY times has come out and said it was wrong to do what it did. That's responsible journalism.
Far more responsible than half the people on here, and FAR MORE RESPONSIBLE than someone saying this is FAKE NEWS.
I AGREE it has NEVER been "FAKE" NEWS but totally BIASED NEWS.
And the bias comes from words they leave out or context of the statement.
This goes WAY WAY BACK to the 70s when the gigantic traitor John Kerry called all our troops like Ghengis Khan.
WHY didn't the MSM report that less than 23 soldiers out of 2,709,918 that served were convicted of such atrocities.
But here the MSM NEVER reported that and to this DAY Kerry's "Genghis Khan" speech is remembered as blasting the entire US MILITARY!
Another example of "BIASED out of context reporting is this:
"Trump anti-immigrant"! 61,000 results in Google of that phrase.
Does the MSM and the rest of idiots that believe that KNOW that Trump is MARRIED TO AN IMMIGRANT? HIS GRANDMOTHER WAS AN IMMIGRANT?
THAT 90+MILLION OF US AMERICANS ARE EITHER LEGAL IMMIGRANTS OR HAVE RELATIVES LIKE TRUMP THAT ARE LEGAL IMMIGRANTS?
SO WHY WOULD TRUMP AND US BE "ANTI-IMMIGRANT"?
No the FACT is the BIASED MSM exemplified by the NYT is so bad in credibility that in 1976 less than 26% of Americans have “a lot of confidence” BUT in 2016 there are less than 6% that have “a lot of confidence”! 2,014 adults surveyed, only 6% expressed “a lot of confidence” in the press.
Only 6% Trust Media, But It Should Be Less | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD
So while this isn't FAKE news IT is extremely BIASED and piss poor reporting... by the supposedly LEADERS in professional journalism"! YUCK!