Nullification of the People

[ihopehefails]

What I have always noticed about liberals is a passive way to nullify the people's opinions on any subject especially when that subject is against what they want to do. A good example is using supposed expert opinions to counter any popular opinion that any majority might have because who is going to dare argue against an "expert".

Now if an expert has a better grasp of the facts than the average citizen then that expert's still has to convince his fellow citizens that he/she is correct because that expert has the same voting power as any other citizen. That makes their right to influence the political process equal with any citizen because their right to express their opinion does not nullify their fellow citizen's right to enter into debate with them.

 

[ba1614]

That, or throw a victim or 2 into the argument.

 

[Xenophon]

Hey, Barry won the nobel prize, that means he is GOD!!!

So shut the fuck up and do whatever he says.

Bitches.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

What I have always noticed about liberals is a passive way to nullify the people's opinions on any subject especially when that subject is against what they want to do. A good example is using supposed expert opinions to counter any popular opinion that any majority might have because who is going to dare argue against an "expert".

Now if an expert has a better grasp of the facts than the average citizen then that expert's still has to convince his fellow citizens that he/she is correct because that expert has the same voting power as any other citizen. That makes their right to influence the political process equal with any citizen because their right to express their opinion does not nullify their fellow citizen's right to enter into debate with them.

Good points. What your forgetting is one simple fact though.
The majority of Democrats are products of the failing public education system and therefore easily duped by these alleged "experts". That's how the "expert" influences others to side with him and vote the same way he does.

A perfect example of this is our dear leader, lord and messiah....The Barry

 

[Oddball]

Let's not forget the elderly, infirm and the sainted chiiilllldrrreennnnnnn!

 

[JakeStarkey]

The People nullified, correctly, the muttering inanities of the toids above in the last election. Huddle in the dark and keep muttering, toids: no one out there is listening.

 

[ba1614]

What the fuck is a "toid"?

 

[VaYank5150]

What I have always noticed about liberals is a passive way to nullify the people's opinions on any subject especially when that subject is against what they want to do. A good example is using supposed expert opinions to counter any popular opinion that any majority might have because who is going to dare argue against an "expert".

Now if an expert has a better grasp of the facts than the average citizen then that expert's still has to convince his fellow citizens that he/she is correct because that expert has the same voting power as any other citizen. That makes their right to influence the political process equal with any citizen because their right to express their opinion does not nullify their fellow citizen's right to enter into debate with them.

Good points. What your forgetting is one simple fact though.
The majority of Democrats are products of the failing public education system and therefore easily duped by these alleged "experts". That's how the "expert" influences others to side with him and vote the same way he does.

A perfect example of this is our dear leader, lord and messiah....The Barry

Can you say "elitist"? I knew you could....

 

[PatekPhilippe]

What the fuck is a "toid"?

It's what starkey is...only what he is begins with "R" as in roid.

 

[jillian]

Hey, Barry won the nobel prize, that means he is GOD!!!

So shut the fuck up and do whatever he says.

Bitches.

where's the evenhandedness that responds to wingers with the "other side"?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Democratic Party far more endorses human rights than does the Republican Party. The Pubs try to restrict the rights of individuals and their opportunities and hopes for the future. Being able to sue the business for hurting or killing your is just and Christian. To oppose it is unjust and devilish.

 

[bodecea]

What I have always noticed about liberals is a passive way to nullify the people's opinions on any subject especially when that subject is against what they want to do. A good example is using supposed expert opinions to counter any popular opinion that any majority might have because who is going to dare argue against an "expert".

Now if an expert has a better grasp of the facts than the average citizen then that expert's still has to convince his fellow citizens that he/she is correct because that expert has the same voting power as any other citizen. That makes their right to influence the political process equal with any citizen because their right to express their opinion does not nullify their fellow citizen's right to enter into debate with them.

Good points. What your forgetting is one simple fact though.
The majority of Democrats are products of the failing public education system and therefore easily duped by these alleged "experts". That's how the "expert" influences others to side with him and vote the same way he does.

A perfect example of this is our dear leader, lord and messiah....The Barry

What are the minority (Republicans) a product of?

 

[nodoginnafight]

What I have always noticed about liberals is a passive way to nullify the people's opinions on any subject especially when that subject is against what they want to do. A good example is using supposed expert opinions to counter any popular opinion that any majority might have because who is going to dare argue against an "expert".

Now if an expert has a better grasp of the facts than the average citizen then that expert's still has to convince his fellow citizens that he/she is correct because that expert has the same voting power as any other citizen. That makes their right to influence the political process equal with any citizen because their right to express their opinion does not nullify their fellow citizen's right to enter into debate with them.

People of ALL political pursuasions trot out experts all the time to support their positions. People have the power to give that expert opinion whatever weight they desire. The additional political clout an expert wields is tied to the number of people who find their opinion persuasive.
That's it - nothing sinister or partisan about it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The fartoid righturd conservatives keep muttering.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

The Democratic Party far more endorses human rights than does the Republican Party.

NYT, Published: September 4, 2009
KUNDUZ, Afghanistan — A NATO airstrike on Friday exploded two fuel tankers that had been hijacked by the Taliban, setting off competing claims about how many among the scores of dead were civilians and raising questions about whether the strike violated tightened rules on the use of aerial bombardment.

That's change you can believe in.

 

[jillian]

The Democratic Party far more endorses human rights than does the Republican Party.

NYT, Published: September 4, 2009
KUNDUZ, Afghanistan — A NATO airstrike on Friday exploded two fuel tankers that had been hijacked by the Taliban, setting off competing claims about how many among the scores of dead were civilians and raising questions about whether the strike violated tightened rules on the use of aerial bombardment.

That's change you can believe in.

Terrorists always say the dead are civilians.... your point?

 

[PatekPhilippe]

The Democratic Party far more endorses human rights than does the Republican Party.

NYT, Published: September 4, 2009
KUNDUZ, Afghanistan — A NATO airstrike on Friday exploded two fuel tankers that had been hijacked by the Taliban, setting off competing claims about how many among the scores of dead were civilians and raising questions about whether the strike violated tightened rules on the use of aerial bombardment.

That's change you can believe in.

Terrorists always say the dead are civilians.... your point?

When it was Bush conducting the war when civilians were killed it was screamed from every mountain top how fuck up he was and then the denials from the left that terrorists used civilians as human shields or claims that the dead were terrorists. Every death was a civilian death to the left when Bush was in office.

 

[jillian]

NYT, Published: September 4, 2009
KUNDUZ, Afghanistan — A NATO airstrike on Friday exploded two fuel tankers that had been hijacked by the Taliban, setting off competing claims about how many among the scores of dead were civilians and raising questions about whether the strike violated tightened rules on the use of aerial bombardment.

That's change you can believe in.

Terrorists always say the dead are civilians.... your point?

When it was Bush conducting the war when civilians were killed it was screamed from every mountain top how fuck up he was and then the denials from the left that terrorists used civilians as human shields or claims that the dead were terrorists. Every death was a civilian death to the left when Bush was in office.

1. bush left his war of choice to be cleaned up by others. there's a difference.
2. he should have focused on afghanistan in 2003.
3. i never talked about "civilian deaths" except to point out why they hate us... to which we were promptly told that they want us occupying their country and are happy to have us. (personally, i'm still waiting for my flowers and candy thanking me for the U.S. invasion of Iraq).