Nuclear rights of Iranian nation.

But now it's their own oppressive regime, not a foreign occupation administration. Most of them like it.

Must be why the streets were filled with celebration when the ayatollah was killed. You know, Britain used to occupy India and Uganda, but try as they might, they finally got the British out of there and replaced them with their own people!

HURRAH!

Then both countries fell apart.
 
Nope….Trump and Israel won’t allow Islamic savages like that to have nuclear weapons.
Nobody cares about what Trump and Israel want.

No thinking person would.
Actually, Russia and China ready to give Iran some nukes and delivery systems. You know, "escalation for de-escalation".
 
By survived Iranian nuclear forces, of course.
They dont have a delivery system capable of hitting the US, yet. Thats assuming the people who even know how to arm and launch their nuclear weapon survived our attack, which is unlikely.
 
C'mon... You can't be serious.


I'm an NRBC-scout by my military speciality. I do understand power of nuclear weapons.
And, given that Iran is just a tip of Chinese and Russian spear, they won't build nuclear weapons in Iran. They will get both weapons and delivery systems from Russia and China.
Actually, China and Russia can teach Iranian Navy sailors and made the disguised as a civilian ship nuclear cruiser in China itself.
Giving nuclear weapons to Iran would be an overt act of war against the US. If China or Russia was going to do that, they may as well not even bother and just attempt a nuclear first strike on us, since giving a nuke to Iran would start that war anyway.

They would never give up their nuke tech to Iran, and they couldnt sneak a nuke to Iran either even if they wanted to, or at least it would have a "China nuke fingerprint" as soon as they light it off. Scientists can tell which nation the nuclear materials came from just by analyzing the blast site. Every nuclear nation has their own nuclear recipe, so they leave behind a clear "fingerprint".
 
Last edited:
Why in the world would the OP think that a savage Islamist Terrorist Regime has the “right” to nuclear weapons?
 
They dont have a delivery system capable of hitting the US, yet. Thats assuming the people who even know how to arm and launch their nuclear weapon survived our attack, which is unlikely.
It's not a big deal to make (or buy) sea-launched ballistic missile and mount it on a civilian surface ship (somewhere on a Chinese shipyard). And yes, Iran can always hire people who will arm and launch nukes.
 
Why in the world would the OP think that a savage Islamist Terrorist Regime has the “right” to nuclear weapons?
Because savage Evangelist and Zionist Terrorist regimes already effectively ended Non Proliferation Treaty, and the Old Eurasian Civilisations, including Iranian one, have to defend themselves.
 
Giving nuclear weapons to Iran would be an overt act of war against the US. If China or Russia was going to do that, they may as well not even bother and just attempt a nuclear first strike on us, since giving a nuke to Iran would start that war anyway.
Actually, we are already at war. And it will just another step on the ladder of escalation.
IMG_20260322_204235.webp



They would never give up their nuke tech to Iran, and they couldnt sneak a nuke to Iran either even if they wanted to, or at least it would have a "China nuke fingerprint" as soon as they light it off. Scientists can tell which nation the nuclear materials came from just by analyzing the blast site. Every nuclear nation has their own nuclear recipe, so they leave behind a clear "fingerprint".
So what? Yes, China sold their nukes to Iran, as, say, United States sold their nukes to Israel and Britain. If Iran nuke one of foreign American military bases, America will face the choice - to alleviate, to nuke Iran or to nuke China and Russia.
 
Nobody cares about what Trump and Israel want.
Only those countries that are free of US influence and political pressure. And there aren't many of those.
Actually, Russia and China ready to give Iran some nukes and delivery systems. You know, "escalation for de-escalation".
Russia not so sure. They are also aware that a regime change in Iran would certainly not help them - rather the opposite.

China no way - they are not interested in supporting nuclear proliferation of other countries - they never supported N-Korea in their attempts to get nukes - that was initially Russia, but foremost Pakistan from the 90'ies onward.
 
Last edited:
15th post
Only those countries that are free of US influence and political pressure.

Russia not so sure. They are also aware that a regime change in Iran would certainly not help them - rather the opposite.

China no way - they are not interested in supporting nuclear proliferation of other countries - they never supported N-Korea in their attempts to get nukes - that was initially Russia, but foremost Pakistan from the 90'ies onward.
There will be big discussions about future of Non Proliferation Treaty in April-May, and if giving nukes to Iran will be the only way to keep it independent, Russia, highly likely, will do it. So is China. They are not interested in another nuclear race, but giving Iran is not in their best interests, too.
 
There will be big discussions about future of Non Proliferation Treaty in April-May, and if giving nukes to Iran will be the only way to keep it independent, Russia, highly likely, will do it. So is China. They are not interested in another nuclear race, but giving Iran is not in their best interests, too.
I don't agree with you on that one.

Iran is far to unstable in regards to their future religious and political aspirations. The intel and state-security in Iran is worse then a Swiss cheese. Russia and China are since 2025 heavily engaged to rectify this matter - but it will take time, especially in regards to Iran's cooperation and "ability" to assure these changes.

Unlike Media gossip constantly propagates - China doesn't rely at all onto Iranian oil or gas. If at all it is their Silk-Road project that faces a possible disruption. Iran might very well become another Iraq, if US ground forces start to become "massively" involved. And Russia/China will use that chaos to inflict massive financial losses, and military losses onto the USA.

The will pay off far better for China then to hand over nukes to a "questionable" country in political disarray.

That does not exclude the high possibility that Iran is now "extremely" motivated to fulfill their own nuke aspirations.
 
Back
Top Bottom