Got that one wrong. Care to try and sum up Muhammad's message in one sentence?
The Quran itself summarises Muhammad's message in one sentence, many times over.
It says " Obey Allah and the messenger". What that really means is obey the messenger, Muhammad.
Fight his wars for him and die for him otherwise he will set Allah on you.
Dear
Dajjal The problem is taking the full message out of context.
The point is for followers to receive ALL sent by God including the Jewish Torah, the Christian Scripture,
the Muslim Quran, and indirectly respecting civil authority as part of the Christian Scriptures
(the truly consistent faithful followers of Islam respect both civil authority and Christians and Jewish
as part of their own teachings; and some even would argue the natural laws the Constitution
is based on were first taught by Mohammad and came from that influence)
There is not supposed to be any political conflict, which is clearly of man
under the spirit of antichrist and not of God in the spirit of Christ or universal conscience.
Whoever is putting their personal beliefs and politics above the whole collective is not fully following God or
the teachings in Islam that teach to receive and respect all that is sent by God. This goes for people on both sides.
It's just that some religious or cult followings are more dangerous than others if they hijack and abuse whole govts
to impose their bidding. The worst danger is mixing religion with gov and authority military actions that bypass due process.
As long as people respect democratic due process, any political or religious conflicts can be worked out mutuallly.
if you look at all cases of corporate, religious or political abuses, the way they bypass checks is to suppress
and obstruct due process and right of defense, equal protections and right to petition to redress grievances.
As long as people agree to follow civil and natural laws on respecting the will of others equally, and also collectively
as a whole, then these abuses wouldn't go so far as to cause violence, destruction and death.
We'd still have differences, but would find ways to work around them instead of declaring war by one group on another
trying to dominate, bully and control each other. Any religion or party can be abused to oppress others,
but the real danger is when this is mixed with GOVT that becomes MANDATORY in authority.
We need to resolve conflicts LONG before ti gets to the point of abusing Govt to push an agenda on everyone else.
We don't agree with an opposing group pushing their beliefs through Govt we don't agree with.
Instead of bullying back and forth to get our way, why not work out solutions all sides agree are optimal.
We'd have to start with ourselves and our own constituents
before we expect people in other countries to do the same instead of fighting more wars of conquest.
I'd like to see more leading by example. Starting locally and working globally.