Miracles have not been demonstrated to occur. The existence of a miracle would pose
logical problems for belief in a god which can supposedly see the future and began the universe with a set of predefined laws. Even if a ‘miracle’ could be demonstrated it
would not immediately imply the existence of a god, much less any
particular one, as unknown natural processes or agents could
still be at work.
Most alleged miracles can be explained as
statistically unlikely occurrences. For example, one child surviving a plane crash that kills two hundred others is not a miracle, just as one person winning the lottery is not. In the absence of any empirical evidence, all other claims can be dismissed as the result of
magical thinking, misattribution,
credulity, hearsay and
anecdote. Eye-witness testimony and anecdotal accounts are, by themselves,
not reliable or definitive forms of proof for such extraordinary claims.
Divine intervention claims most often concern systems and events for which we have poor predictive capabilities, for example, weather, sports, health and social/economic interactions. Such claims are rarely made in relation to those things we can accurately predict and test e.g. the motion of celestial bodies, boiling point of water and pull of gravity. If a god is constantly intervening in the universe it supposedly created, then it is with such ambiguity as to appear completely indistinguishable from normal background chance.
Note: Theists often fail to adequately
apportion blame when claims of their particular god’s ‘infinite mercy’ or ‘omnibenevolence’ involve sparing a few lives in a disaster, or recovery from a debilitating disease – all of which their god would ultimately be
responsible for inflicting if it existed. See also:
Euthyphro dilemma,
Confirmation bias,
Cherry Picking.
See also:
Argument from Miracles,
Why won’t god heal amputees? Spontaneous Remission of Disease,
The problem with anecdotes (a must watch).
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” – Carl Sagan
“Elite athletes make first place, strange shapes appear on toast and some people narrowly escape death, but amputated limbs never regrow, mountains never move and food never spontaneously appears in front of the hundreds of children that starve to death each hour.” – Anonymous
Disagree
sealybobo
1. First of all miracles do not need to contradict science.
Life can be considered a miracle we cannot fully explain. What drives life toward preserving more life?
We don't know. Thus it is a miracle that life begets life if we cannot explain this, yet it is consistent with science.
2. Secondly, if you want to call even "miraculous" changes that occurred NATURALLY
as demonstrations of how divine/life energy works,
there is PLENTY of proof that this has happened in many instances and forms.
Again, I have long pointed out the benefits of studying and proving how Spiritual Healing works.
There are plenty of cases of people who were "miraculously' cured of Rheumatoid Arthritis,
going from crippled and bedridden in pain, to walking normally with no more symptoms and without using any
medication. And cases of people cured of "incureable" Schizophrenia who restored their minds and free will,
and are no longer hijacked by demonic personalities and voices that took over their lives and held them hostage in their own bodies. Not to mention testimonies of people cured of deadly addictions almost instantly with no withdrawal symptoms,
or healed of terminal diseases where the doctors can't explain why they are in perfect health, or even people who were either dying or declared dead but recovered with no brain or organ damage.
The power of LIFE to heal NATURALLY is the same process and power as God represents.
So this has been demonstrated, and is still faith based at the same time.
It is miraculous in some cases, where it cannot be explained, yet consistent with science at the same time.
You keep framing things as either/or, but the truth can be "all of the above."
Both faith and reason are satisfied, and not sacrificed or compromised one for the other.
Both science and religion can describe the same process and be consistent with each other.
What is natural can be described as spiritual, what is spiritual can be explained in natural terms.
There does not have to be contradiction or conflicts we cannot solve.
The process in life is what it is, and we can use both science and religious terms to explain it.
And it is STILL the same process that all humans go through, it is universal for all humanity to grow to maturity,
but at the same time each person has their own version of this according to their circumstances, so it is unique too!
As soon as we can forgive our differences over these things,
we can better see how they fit together as complements and not be in conflict as we feared.
Thanks for sharing here and I look forward to finishing this journey together,
with each person contributing valuable insights that are all important to reach a mutual understanding of the whole.
Take care and Thank you!
A
miracle is an event not explicable by natural or scientific laws.
“Every atom in your body came from a star that exploded. And, the atoms in your left hand probably came from a different star than your right hand. It really is the most poetic thing I know about physics: You are stardust. You couldn’t be here if stars hadn’t exploded, because the elements – the carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, iron, all the things that matter for evolution and for life – weren’t created at the beginning of time. They were created in the nuclear furnaces of stars, and the only way for them to get into your body is if those stars were kind enough to explode. So, forget Jesus. The stars died so that you could be today.”– Lawrence Krauss
What drives life toward preserving more life? What do you mean by this? Maybe I can answer this for you scientifically.
There are plenty of cases of people who were "miraculously' cured
Miracles have not been demonstrated to occur. The existence of a miracle would pose
logical problemsfor belief in a god which can supposedly see the future and began the universe with a set of predefined laws. Even if a ‘miracle’ could be demonstrated it
would notimmediately imply the existence of a god, much less any
particular one, as unknown natural processes or agents could
still be at work. Most alleged miracles can be explained as
statistically unlikely occurrences. For example, one child surviving a plane crash that kills two hundred others is not a miracle, just as one person winning the lottery is not. In the absence of any empirical evidence, all other claims can be dismissed as the result of
magical thinking, misattribution,
credulity, hearsay and
anecdote. Eye-witness testimony and anecdotal accounts are, by themselves,
not reliable or definitiveforms of proof for such extraordinary claims.
Want to show me a miracle? Show me the sun rise in the west and set in the east here in Michigan. If a god is constantly intervening in the universe it supposedly created, then it is with such ambiguity as to appear completely indistinguishable from normal background chance. Theists often fail to adequately
apportion blamewhen claims of their particular god’s ‘infinite mercy’ or ‘omnibenevolence’ involve sparing a few lives in a disaster, or recovery from a debilitating disease – all of which their god would ultimately be
responsible for inflictingif it existed. If your child is cured of cancer, it’s a miracle. If he/she dies, it’s god’s will? Saying, “it was a miracle” explains nothing.
OK
sealybobo then "explain" how the soul or personality of a person
gets into the body. Where does the energy come from and how does life replicate itself?
We may be able to explain the physical chemical steps we can quantify
but what about the capacities of humanity that are subtle and we can't predict or explain how everything works?
What allows the process of forgiveness and healing.
How can one person happen to connect online, without having to meet,
and influence another person in a positive way. is it just the chemical reactions in the brain?
I've had people report more than just that level of change, but changing their
personality and coming out feeling loved or relieved or making some huge leap bigger than
any words typed on the screen.
How do you "explain" how someone can experience years and years of serious abuse and hurt,
but a single action, a kind word or gesture, can somehow overtake and erase all that even though it is not proportional.
sealybobo there are a lot of things we can explain with science
and still have parts of it that are faith based.
If you read Scott Peck's book Glimpses of the Devil, he said similar
about what he observed with successful therapy for schizophrenic patients.
He said 95% of what he observed and documented could be explained by traditional science.
But there was 5% that he felt without any doubt was coming from a higher spiritual level
that exceeded scientific definitions and understanding.
The point is,
sealybobo, that this science does NOT have to negate the
faith based approach to the same process; nor does the faith have to negate the scientific explanation.
IT IS STILL THE SAME PROCESS, that's the point!
So if you want to use science to explain how forgiveness therapy and spiritual healing work, that works for that
audience and context. While those who need to connect with it through their religious or spiritual systems,
that works for that audience too!
sealybobo this is not a competition between religion and science to prove one right and the other wrong.
it is a partnership for those who use religious terms and those who use science and natural laws
to check and balance each other, to serve as "two independent witnesses" to describe the
SAME processes in life, and stick to where they AGREE in principle what is happening,
what causes problems, and what helps with correcting them!
This is like two ranges of instruments, the bass and the treble, both playing complementary parts
of the same symphony. it is NOT a contest for one section to outblast the other off the stage.
They are supposed to synchronize and create harmony so the whole piece can be complete.
the music that is conveyed is what is the goal, and all the different instruments are equally necessary to the whole.