Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy

[danielpalos]

Where's all that unemployment that Obamacare was going to create?

Where's all that unemployment that letting the top tax rate cut expire was going to create?

Social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway; the right wing just like to "get Mikey involved" and "complain about Everything".

 

[P@triot]

CNN just announced need that a study by the University of Washington showed that the lowest income workers earned $125 less per month after Seattle implemented their $15 per hour minimum wage. While the workers earned on average 3% more, their hours were cut on average by 9% - resulting in a net loss to their income.

The study concluded that this is basic economics - that when something costs more (such as labor), people simply learn to do with less of it.

Thanks to the Dumbocrats - the poorest among us are now further behind. If only the left understood basic economics. I guess that's why they are called Dumbocrats.

 

[danielpalos]

CNN just announced need that a study by the University of Washington showed that the lowest income workers earned $125 less per month after Seattle implemented their $15 per hour minimum wage. While the workers earned on average 3% more, their hours were cut on average by 9% - resulting in a net loss to their income.

The study concluded that this is basic economics - that when something costs more (such as labor), people simply learn to do with less of it.

Thanks to the Dumbocrats - the poorest among us are now further behind. If only the left understood basic economics. I guess that's why they are called Dumbocrats.

Not having to work harder for less, is an improvement.

 

[P@triot]

CNN just announced need that a study by the University of Washington showed that the lowest income workers earned $125 less per month after Seattle implemented their $15 per hour minimum wage. While the workers earned on average 3% more, their hours were cut on average by 9% - resulting in a net loss to their income.

The study concluded that this is basic economics - that when something costs more (such as labor), people simply learn to do with less of it.

Thanks to the Dumbocrats - the poorest among us are now further behind. If only the left understood basic economics. I guess that's why they are called Dumbocrats.

Not having to work harder for less, is an improvement.

But that's exactly what they are doing. They are now coming home with $125 less per month in their paychecks. Thanks to the Dumbocrats, the lowest earners among us are now even further behind.

Even in the face of indisputable facts, you're unable to accept that the ideology you embrace is a failed ideology. Typical left-wing nut-job.

 

[danielpalos]

CNN just announced need that a study by the University of Washington showed that the lowest income workers earned $125 less per month after Seattle implemented their $15 per hour minimum wage. While the workers earned on average 3% more, their hours were cut on average by 9% - resulting in a net loss to their income.

The study concluded that this is basic economics - that when something costs more (such as labor), people simply learn to do with less of it.

Thanks to the Dumbocrats - the poorest among us are now further behind. If only the left understood basic economics. I guess that's why they are called Dumbocrats.

Not having to work harder for less, is an improvement.

But that's exactly what they are doing. They are now coming home with $125 less per month in their paychecks. Thanks to the Dumbocrats, the lowest earners among us are now even further behind.

Even in the face of indisputable facts, you're unable to accept that the ideology you embrace is a failed ideology. Typical left-wing nut-job.

working fewer hours means they have more time for school.

 

[NYcarbineer]

CNN just announced need that a study by the University of Washington showed that the lowest income workers earned $125 less per month after Seattle implemented their $15 per hour minimum wage. While the workers earned on average 3% more, their hours were cut on average by 9% - resulting in a net loss to their income.

The study concluded that this is basic economics - that when something costs more (such as labor), people simply learn to do with less of it.

Thanks to the Dumbocrats - the poorest among us are now further behind. If only the left understood basic economics. I guess that's why they are called Dumbocrats.

Not having to work harder for less, is an improvement.

But that's exactly what they are doing. They are now coming home with $125 less per month in their paychecks. Thanks to the Dumbocrats, the lowest earners among us are now even further behind.

Even in the face of indisputable facts, you're unable to accept that the ideology you embrace is a failed ideology. Typical left-wing nut-job.

What's better? One person working for 15 dollars an hour or 3 people working for 5 dollars an hour?

 

[danielpalos]

CNN just announced need that a study by the University of Washington showed that the lowest income workers earned $125 less per month after Seattle implemented their $15 per hour minimum wage. While the workers earned on average 3% more, their hours were cut on average by 9% - resulting in a net loss to their income.

The study concluded that this is basic economics - that when something costs more (such as labor), people simply learn to do with less of it.

Thanks to the Dumbocrats - the poorest among us are now further behind. If only the left understood basic economics. I guess that's why they are called Dumbocrats.

Not having to work harder for less, is an improvement.

But that's exactly what they are doing. They are now coming home with $125 less per month in their paychecks. Thanks to the Dumbocrats, the lowest earners among us are now even further behind.

Even in the face of indisputable facts, you're unable to accept that the ideology you embrace is a failed ideology. Typical left-wing nut-job.

What's better? One person working for 15 dollars an hour or 3 people working for 5 dollars an hour?

CEOs may get a bonus for "improved performance", if the CEO can get a tax break for three people instead of only one. The government simply pays more in social services via taxes, that the right wing loves to complain about.

 

[P@triot]

working fewer hours means they have more time for school.

Wait...I thought the idea was that the previous minimum wage wasn't a "livable" wage and that these people are suffering. Now you're trying to spin their having even less money to live off of as a positive?

Bwahahaha!!!! You just exposed yourself, snowflake.

 

[danielpalos]

working fewer hours means they have more time for school.

Wait...I thought the idea was that the previous minimum wage wasn't a "livable" wage and that these people are suffering. Now you're trying to spin their having even less money to live off of as a positive?

Bwahahaha!!!! You just exposed yourself, snowflake.

you are welcome to do some math; it has to be more cost effective for labor to actually provide labor, at fifteen dollars an hour versus our current minimum wage.

 

[pinqy]

CNN just announced need that a study by the University of Washington showed that the lowest income workers earned $125 less per month after Seattle implemented their $15 per hour minimum wage. While the workers earned on average 3% more, their hours were cut on average by 9% - resulting in a net loss to their income.

The study concluded that this is basic economics - that when something costs more (such as labor), people simply learn to do with less of it.

Thanks to the Dumbocrats - the poorest among us are now further behind. If only the left understood basic economics. I guess that's why they are called Dumbocrats.

Not having to work harder for less, is an improvement.

But that's exactly what they are doing. They are now coming home with $125 less per month in their paychecks. Thanks to the Dumbocrats, the lowest earners among us are now even further behind.

Even in the face of indisputable facts, you're unable to accept that the ideology you embrace is a failed ideology. Typical left-wing nut-job.

What's better? One person working for 15 dollars an hour or 3 people working for 5 dollars an hour?

ooooh. I have the Official Economist Answer for this one: "It depends."

 

[P@triot]

What's better? One person working for 15 dollars an hour or 3 people working for 5 dollars an hour?

Three people working for $15 per hour is exponentially better. You get 3x's the productivity for the same price. So the business can operate more efficiently. And for society, you employ three people instead of one.

 

[Slyhunter]

CNN just announced need that a study by the University of Washington showed that the lowest income workers earned $125 less per month after Seattle implemented their $15 per hour minimum wage. While the workers earned on average 3% more, their hours were cut on average by 9% - resulting in a net loss to their income.

The study concluded that this is basic economics - that when something costs more (such as labor), people simply learn to do with less of it.

Thanks to the Dumbocrats - the poorest among us are now further behind. If only the left understood basic economics. I guess that's why they are called Dumbocrats.

Not having to work harder for less, is an improvement.

But that's exactly what they are doing. They are now coming home with $125 less per month in their paychecks. Thanks to the Dumbocrats, the lowest earners among us are now even further behind.

Even in the face of indisputable facts, you're unable to accept that the ideology you embrace is a failed ideology. Typical left-wing nut-job.

What's better? One person working for 15 dollars an hour or 3 people working for 5 dollars an hour?

Ask the two people not working.

 

[P@triot]

Nothing ends in failure like left-wing policy...

Bankrupt Illinois Slams Citizens With 32% Income Tax Hike, More to Come

 

[Billo_Really]

Everywhere liberals get these insane minimum wages shoved through, we see insane unemployment. Businesses move or shut down. Nothing but poverty is left in the wake of liberal policy. What a damn shame...

Minimum wage hikes put pressure on businesses to 're-engineer labor force,' a restaurateur says - LA Times
Some restaurants face pressure to trim menus and staffs under California's wage hike

Then why did we have 8 years of growth under Bill Clinton which allowed him to leave office with a budget surplus?

 

[P@triot]

Everywhere liberals get these insane minimum wages shoved through, we see insane unemployment. Businesses move or shut down. Nothing but poverty is left in the wake of liberal policy. What a damn shame...

Minimum wage hikes put pressure on businesses to 're-engineer labor force,' a restaurateur says - LA Times
Some restaurants face pressure to trim menus and staffs under California's wage hike

Then why did we have 8 years of growth under Bill Clinton which allowed him to leave office with a budget surplus?

Because Newt Gingrich and the Republicans were in charge of Congress (which controls the purse strings, the tax policies, etc.).

 

[Billo_Really]

Because Newt Gingrich and the Republicans were in charge of Congress (which controls the purse strings, the tax policies, etc.).

That would've meant Congressional republicans were working WITH Slick Willy.

 

[Billo_Really]

Nothing ends in failure like left-wing policy...

Bankrupt Illinois Slams Citizens With 32% Income Tax Hike, More to Come

That just means they suck in Illinois.

 

[P@triot]

Nothing ends in failure like left-wing policy...

Bankrupt Illinois Slams Citizens With 32% Income Tax Hike, More to Come

That just means they suck in Illinois.

What about Detroit? Where they caused an entire city to file bankruptcy? What about the U.S.S.R.? Where they caused an entire nation to collapse.

 

[P@triot]

Because Newt Gingrich and the Republicans were in charge of Congress (which controls the purse strings, the tax policies, etc.).

That would've meant Congressional republicans were working WITH Slick Willy.

Something the Dumbocrats in Congress refuse to do with President Trump.

 

[Billo_Really]

What about Detroit? Where they caused an entire city to file bankruptcy? What about the U.S.S.R.? Where they caused an entire nation to collapse.

Democrats answer to the same people Republicans do. The Democrats do it because they are incompetent; Republicans do everything they can to **** this country and this healthcare bill is a perfect example of that.