Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy

[P@triot]

The question has to be asked

----Why should one kill themselves for low wages for 60 years and die? There's more to life and liberal policies consider that.----

Only the super rich that want to use us and spit us out believe in otherwise.

Nobody has to do that. Each and every individual has the liberty to start their own company and sell their own labor. If you're an electrician - you don't have to work for someone else. You can sell your own skills. Same if you are a plumber, an IT tech, a physician, or anything else.

So now, the question has to be asked: why do you create false narratives and insist on trying to make all of society a victim? I answer your question fairly and honestly, you owe me the same courtesy.

 

[12icer]

Defense means complete protection of ones person, The only thing I can find that violates that is protecting obama, clinton, Bush and anyone but the President and his direct successor. In fact I think Trump would be better off with his closest guards being his Personal people. But your idea of "equal protection" meaning something about wages is PURE BULLSHIT and the dumbest idea I have ever seen on this forum. The fact is that your liberal ideas about wage control are the stupidest ideas that have ever been spoken by any fool. What you stupid people don't realize is the FACT that no small business is covered because of the pressure it puts on their bottom line and if it were it would put then out of business or they would use their family exclusively to do the business. THE NEXT PART OF THAT is NO large company has to employ anyone for any reason. That means if you unionize and the company feels they will lose their decided upon profit margin they will just close the business and either rename it with a small workforce that does not meet minimum wage requirements or close it and take the jobs elsewhere. Billionaires don't have to do anything to make money especially deal with thousands of workers. The Walton family has almost no interest in Wal-Mart, the one with the most investment has nothing to do with it and she is a FLAMING stupid ass liberal just like you. Like all liberals she keeps her money and lets others fend for themselves wanting everyone else to pay. SO take your ideas and cry because they are not true really viable, or even humane as they cause more loss than gain.

MOST Super rich people don't care anything at all about the masses They can just close every business anytime, take their money and let all of the people they employed go to work at a fast food restaurant until they all fold from lack of customers in a few weeks. As long as they don't get a lot of shit from scum they allow things to run along but at anytime if you igmos really piss them off they can just close the faucet and your drips will stop and there will no money for you to steal.

The main thing is they pay ALL of the taxes, not just what they earn, they pay all of the people they employ's taxes too. So your liberal communist government wont have ANY money when they close the doors.

 

[danielpalos]

Why should i take you seriously?

Because I just provided multiple quotes from Thomas Jefferson which prove you are wrong and I am right.

you have lousy reading comprehension.

You have lousy arguments once you get obliterated with facts.

You have no facts, only obsolete, propaganda and rhetoric.

 

[danielpalos]

our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; are defense?

Is the war on terror "defense"? Yes. Yes it is, dumb ass.

The only dumb ones, are on the right wing:

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

 

[danielpalos]

The question has to be asked

----Why should one kill themselves for low wages for 60 years and die? There's more to life and liberal policies consider that.----

Only the super rich that want to use us and spit us out believe in otherwise.

Nobody has to do that. Each and every individual has the liberty to start their own company and sell their own labor. If you're an electrician - you don't have to work for someone else. You can sell your own skills. Same if you are a plumber, an IT tech, a physician, or anything else.

So now, the question has to be asked: why do you create false narratives and insist on trying to make all of society a victim? I answer your question fairly and honestly, you owe me the same courtesy.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages, not minimum wages; every capitalist can do the same.

 

[P@triot]

our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; are defense?

Is the war on terror "defense"? Yes. Yes it is, dumb ass.

The only dumb ones, are on the right wing:

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

What does your unattributed, idiotic, crunch-granola, hippie quote have to do with whether or not the "war on terror" is "defense" (which even a 4-year old could answer it obviously is)? We weren't talking about profits snowflake. You look even dumber now.

 

[P@triot]

The question has to be asked

----Why should one kill themselves for low wages for 60 years and die? There's more to life and liberal policies consider that.----

Only the super rich that want to use us and spit us out believe in otherwise.

Nobody has to do that. Each and every individual has the liberty to start their own company and sell their own labor. If you're an electrician - you don't have to work for someone else. You can sell your own skills. Same if you are a plumber, an IT tech, a physician, or anything else.

So now, the question has to be asked: why do you create false narratives and insist on trying to make all of society a victim? I answer your question fairly and honestly, you owe me the same courtesy.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages, not minimum wages; every capitalist can do the same.

No they can't. Many capitalists file bankruptcy and go out of business. If you can't even afford to stay in business, how can you double the wages of your labor? Stop being a naïve, idealistic, immature, buffoon. This isn't utopia - it's the real world, slugger. It's time to put your big boy pants on and act like a rational adult.

Now back to the point that you so conveniently bypassed because it exposed your false narrative - nobody has to work for someone else. Whatever your particular skills set is, you can sell your own labor for the price you feel your labor is worth. That is a fact. I've seen it done over and over and over. So the question has to be asked: why do you create a false narrative in hopes of trying to convince everyone they are a victim?

 

[P@triot]

This is what happens when you elect amateurs, idealists, and community organizers to public office. This is unquestionably the most catastrophic legislation ever crafted and/or passed and it is indisputable proof that nothing creates failure like left-wing ideology.

Former Obama HHS chief makes surprising admission about one of Obamacare’s failures

 

[danielpalos]

our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; are defense?

Is the war on terror "defense"? Yes. Yes it is, dumb ass.

The only dumb ones, are on the right wing:

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

What does your unattributed, idiotic, crunch-granola, hippie quote have to do with whether or not the "war on terror" is "defense" (which even a 4-year old could answer it obviously is)? We weren't talking about profits snowflake. You look even dumber now.

Congress cannot justify real times of war tax rates for it; that is the capital difference. Only national socialists don't understand the concept.

 

[danielpalos]

The question has to be asked

----Why should one kill themselves for low wages for 60 years and die? There's more to life and liberal policies consider that.----

Only the super rich that want to use us and spit us out believe in otherwise.

Nobody has to do that. Each and every individual has the liberty to start their own company and sell their own labor. If you're an electrician - you don't have to work for someone else. You can sell your own skills. Same if you are a plumber, an IT tech, a physician, or anything else.

So now, the question has to be asked: why do you create false narratives and insist on trying to make all of society a victim? I answer your question fairly and honestly, you owe me the same courtesy.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages, not minimum wages; every capitalist can do the same.

No they can't. Many capitalists file bankruptcy and go out of business. If you can't even afford to stay in business, how can you double the wages of your labor? Stop being a naïve, idealistic, immature, buffoon. This isn't utopia - it's the real world, slugger. It's time to put your big boy pants on and act like a rational adult.

Now back to the point that you so conveniently bypassed because it exposed your false narrative - nobody has to work for someone else. Whatever your particular skills set is, you can sell your own labor for the price you feel your labor is worth. That is a fact. I've seen it done over and over and over. So the question has to be asked: why do you create a false narrative in hopes of trying to convince everyone they are a victim?

Why claim the poor can do any better than those, richer than them.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Liberals believe unemployment is good for the economy.
Pelosi: Extending Unemployment 'One of Best Ways to Grow the Economy'

Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Summary: The Role of Unemployment as an Automatic Stabilizer During a Recession

have a multiplier effect of 2.0: for every dollar spent on unemployment insurance, this report finds an increase in economic activity of two dollars.

Source: ETA News Release: US Labor Department study underscores positive impact of unemployment insurance [11/16/2010]

Automatic Stabilizer

Right that's why Democrats are the majority in the Fed and winning states around the country oh wait they aren't. Democrats certainly aren't paying attention to economics or the law they can't with all the time spent on identity politics. The majority of people don't like being played as the victim.

Nothing but right wing propaganda instead of a valid argument?

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.
​

Why a lot of people are moving out of California

California prices are a reflection of the free market that conservatives seem to worship. When a place has everything in terms of weather and amenities, most everyone would want to live there if they could afford it. I used to live there and miss it dearly.

If you think Kalifornia operates with anything even RESEMBLING a free market, you are taking some REALLY good drugs.

 

[JoeNormal]

Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Summary: The Role of Unemployment as an Automatic Stabilizer During a Recession

Automatic Stabilizer

Right that's why Democrats are the majority in the Fed and winning states around the country oh wait they aren't. Democrats certainly aren't paying attention to economics or the law they can't with all the time spent on identity politics. The majority of people don't like being played as the victim.

Nothing but right wing propaganda instead of a valid argument?

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.
​

Why a lot of people are moving out of California

California prices are a reflection of the free market that conservatives seem to worship. When a place has everything in terms of weather and amenities, most everyone would want to live there if they could afford it. I used to live there and miss it dearly.

If you think Kalifornia operates with anything even RESEMBLING a free market, you are taking some REALLY good drugs.

How do you explain the ridiculous home prices then?

 

[danielpalos]

Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Summary: The Role of Unemployment as an Automatic Stabilizer During a Recession

Automatic Stabilizer

Right that's why Democrats are the majority in the Fed and winning states around the country oh wait they aren't. Democrats certainly aren't paying attention to economics or the law they can't with all the time spent on identity politics. The majority of people don't like being played as the victim.

Nothing but right wing propaganda instead of a valid argument?

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.
​

Why a lot of people are moving out of California

California prices are a reflection of the free market that conservatives seem to worship. When a place has everything in terms of weather and amenities, most everyone would want to live there if they could afford it. I used to live there and miss it dearly.

If you think Kalifornia operates with anything even RESEMBLING a free market, you are taking some REALLY good drugs.

Not sure what you mean. Can you explain your position better?

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California

 

[Cellblock2429]

President Obamas liberal policies have generated ten million jobs




.

/--- Obozo cooked the books and counted part time jobs as newly created after a guy lost his full time job.

 

[danielpalos]

President Obamas liberal policies have generated ten million jobs




.

/--- Obozo cooked the books and counted part time jobs as newly created after a guy lost his full time job.

the wealthy can take advantage of a capital gains preference to create Jobs Booms.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

there are more Americans working multiple part time jobs to make up for the high paying long term full time career they once had.

LIAR!
When Obama became president 5.2% of the working population worked 2 jobs and it was 4.9% when Obama left. Through the entire Bush Regime it was never under 5%. Under Tramp it has jumped up to 5.3% with over half a million more working 2 jobs since Tramp took over.

I'm not wrong. In fact I'm able to back up my point with facts. Unless you want to claim Trump was president in 2016, you will find you are the one who is incorrect.


The 6 million Americans who work part-time but want full-time jobs today are at the highest level in about 30 years or so.

America's part-time problem may be permanent


A troubling breakdown in the new Bureau of Labor Statistics report that he described as the red flashing light - the number of multiple job holders has risen to a record 8.5 million. In October, a survey revealed that 103,000 full time jobs were lost, and 90.000 part time jobs were added

America Becoming A Part-Time Worker Society

 

[pinqy]

there are more Americans working multiple part time jobs to make up for the high paying long term full time career they once had.

LIAR!
When Obama became president 5.2% of the working population worked 2 jobs and it was 4.9% when Obama left. Through the entire Bush Regime it was never under 5%. Under Tramp it has jumped up to 5.3% with over half a million more working 2 jobs since Tramp took over.

I'm not wrong. In fact I'm able to back up my point with facts. Unless you want to claim Trump was president in 2016, you will find you are the one who is incorrect.


The 6 million Americans who work part-time but want full-time jobs today are at the highest level in about 30 years or so.

America's part-time problem may be permanent

Well, that's certainly untrue. Although to be fair, the definition did change in 1994 causing a large drop in the number (before 1994, people weren't asked if they could actually work full time). But even so, your claim is untrue:

A troubling breakdown in the new Bureau of Labor Statistics report that he described as the red flashing light - the number of multiple job holders has risen to a record 8.5 million.

8.05 million in October 2016.. However...these are the not seasonally adjusted numbers. For some strange reason, every year the number of people working more than one job goes up in October. Huh...I wonder why that could be?
Now, the seasonally adjusted numbers, which account for regular patterns like that, do show a recent increase in multiple job holders after a big drop due to the recession. We see a similar pattern from the 2001 recession. And looking at the percent of the population working multiple jobs, that shows an interesting pattern:

In October, a survey revealed that 103,000 full time jobs were lost, and 90.000 part time jobs were added

Yep. But that was an aberration. Part time bounces up and down a lot.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

there are more Americans working multiple part time jobs to make up for the high paying long term full time career they once had.

LIAR!
When Obama became president 5.2% of the working population worked 2 jobs and it was 4.9% when Obama left. Through the entire Bush Regime it was never under 5%. Under Tramp it has jumped up to 5.3% with over half a million more working 2 jobs since Tramp took over.

I'm not wrong. In fact I'm able to back up my point with facts. Unless you want to claim Trump was president in 2016, you will find you are the one who is incorrect.


The 6 million Americans who work part-time but want full-time jobs today are at the highest level in about 30 years or so.

America's part-time problem may be permanent

Well, that's certainly untrue. Although to be fair, the definition did change in 1994 causing a large drop in the number (before 1994, people weren't asked if they could actually work full time). But even so, your claim is untrue:

A troubling breakdown in the new Bureau of Labor Statistics report that he described as the red flashing light - the number of multiple job holders has risen to a record 8.5 million.

8.05 million in October 2016.. However...these are the not seasonally adjusted numbers. For some strange reason, every year the number of people working more than one job goes up in October. Huh...I wonder why that could be?
Now, the seasonally adjusted numbers, which account for regular patterns like that, do show a recent increase in multiple job holders after a big drop due to the recession. We see a similar pattern from the 2001 recession. And looking at the percent of the population working multiple jobs, that shows an interesting pattern:

In October, a survey revealed that 103,000 full time jobs were lost, and 90.000 part time jobs were added

Yep. But that was an aberration. Part time bounces up and down a lot.

So you are looking to take the opinion of one non government site FRED to counter two linked articles, one a liberal CNN, that compliments the same findings from using government Bureau of Labor Statistics.

 

[pinqy]

there are more Americans working multiple part time jobs to make up for the high paying long term full time career they once had.

LIAR!
When Obama became president 5.2% of the working population worked 2 jobs and it was 4.9% when Obama left. Through the entire Bush Regime it was never under 5%. Under Tramp it has jumped up to 5.3% with over half a million more working 2 jobs since Tramp took over.

I'm not wrong. In fact I'm able to back up my point with facts. Unless you want to claim Trump was president in 2016, you will find you are the one who is incorrect.


The 6 million Americans who work part-time but want full-time jobs today are at the highest level in about 30 years or so.

America's part-time problem may be permanent

Well, that's certainly untrue. Although to be fair, the definition did change in 1994 causing a large drop in the number (before 1994, people weren't asked if they could actually work full time). But even so, your claim is untrue:

A troubling breakdown in the new Bureau of Labor Statistics report that he described as the red flashing light - the number of multiple job holders has risen to a record 8.5 million.

8.05 million in October 2016.. However...these are the not seasonally adjusted numbers. For some strange reason, every year the number of people working more than one job goes up in October. Huh...I wonder why that could be?
Now, the seasonally adjusted numbers, which account for regular patterns like that, do show a recent increase in multiple job holders after a big drop due to the recession. We see a similar pattern from the 2001 recession. And looking at the percent of the population working multiple jobs, that shows an interesting pattern:

In October, a survey revealed that 103,000 full time jobs were lost, and 90.000 part time jobs were added

Yep. But that was an aberration. Part time bounces up and down a lot.

So you are looking to take the opinion of one non government site FRED to counter two linked articles, one a liberal CNN, that compliments the same findings from using government Bureau of Labor Statistics.

No. FRED is using the BLS data, and just puts in an easier to use format for graphing.

 

[edthecynic]

The 6 million Americans who work part-time but want full-time jobs today are at the highest level in about 30 years or so.

LIAR!
When Obama took office there were 8,046,000 working PT who want FT, and there were 5,840,000 when he left, a DECLINE of over 2 million.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Part-Time for Economic Reasons, All Industries