Jarlaxle
Gold Member
My wife works with a guy that has one leg...though other than needing a truck with an automatic transmission, I hesitate to call him "disabled".
Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy
- Thread starter P@triot
- Start date
P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #942
Sweetie...the facts say otherwise. Just because your dad was one of the lucky few (or, more likely being that he sounds like a liberal, engaged in unethical and illegal behavior to move up) doesn't change reality. When ever radical left-wing UCLA is admitting that FDR's idiotic liberal policies greatly extended The Great Depression, you're false narrative isn't going to hold up well.
Warren G. Harding (conservative) and Calvin Coolidge (conservative) oversaw the roaring 20's. FDR (liberal) oversaw The Great Depression. Jimmy Carter (liberal) oversaw The Great Recessions. And Ronald Reagan (conservative) oversaw one of (if not thee) greatest economies in U.S. history (after taking the reigns of the great recession from Jimmy Carter).
TheProgressivePatriot
Platinum Member
STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"Still no documentation. "spreading the wealth" does not make one a Marxist. This country has used the government to "spread the wealth" -to improve lives and level the playing field since the progressive movement and Teddy Roosevelt in the very early 1900. It is what has made this country what it is , although we could be better. It appears that to you anyone who is not a lais·sez-faire capitalist and who favors any degree of regulation is a Marxist and that is just as stupid as stupid gets. Capitalists will not regulate themselves. They are out for themselves and themselves only and the rest of us and the good of the country be damned.Interesting how after 8 years of Barack Obama's own words being provided you have no recollection of it. Convenient as well...Interesting how you fail to provide a source to support your bloviating.Yeah....it's fall down hilarious the things you liberals are incapable of "recalling". Always seems to be extraordinarily convenient to coinciding with your left-wing ideology. Just coincidence I guess...
"...I sought out the Marxist professors" - Barack Obama, Dreams from My Father
"....and I think the way you do that is to spread the wealth" - Barack Obama to Joe the Plumber
Oh....and lets not forget that Obama calls card carrying member #47544 of Communist Party U.S.A. his "mentor"!
Now start you're typical liberal nonsense of denying and/or minimizing. Go on...get into full on libtard damage control. Tell us how words don't mean anything. How that's not really what Obama "meant". How that doesn't "prove anything". You know....all of the tired and pitiful libtard excuses. Maybe you can even call me "racist"!
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #945
Why would I - you've denied video and his book. You'll just deny the link as well. And lets not forget about a card carrying member of Communist Party U.S.A. being Obama's "mentor" according to Obama himself. I notice you're running like hell from that one (like all of the other one's)!STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"Still no documentation. "spreading the wealth" does not make one a Marxist. This country has used the government to "spread the wealth" -to improve lives and level the playing field since the progressive movement and Teddy Roosevelt in the very early 1900. It is what has made this country what it is , although we could be better. It appears that to you anyone who is not a lais·sez-faire capitalist and who favors any degree of regulation is a Marxist and that is just as stupid as stupid gets. Capitalists will not regulate themselves. They are out for themselves and themselves only and the rest of us and the good of the country be damned.Interesting how after 8 years of Barack Obama's own words being provided you have no recollection of it. Convenient as well...Interesting how you fail to provide a source to support your bloviating.Yeah....it's fall down hilarious the things you liberals are incapable of "recalling". Always seems to be extraordinarily convenient to coinciding with your left-wing ideology. Just coincidence I guess...
"...I sought out the Marxist professors" - Barack Obama, Dreams from My Father
"....and I think the way you do that is to spread the wealth" - Barack Obama to Joe the Plumber
Oh....and lets not forget that Obama calls card carrying member #47544 of Communist Party U.S.A. his "mentor"!
Now start you're typical liberal nonsense of denying and/or minimizing. Go on...get into full on libtard damage control. Tell us how words don't mean anything. How that's not really what Obama "meant". How that doesn't "prove anything". You know....all of the tired and pitiful libtard excuses. Maybe you can even call me "racist"!
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #946
Ohhhh.....I get it! You're illiterate. You can't do any research on the internet for yourself. You need someone to spoon feed it to you like a child. My bad....I completely forgot that you are a liberal.STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"Still no documentation. "spreading the wealth" does not make one a Marxist. This country has used the government to "spread the wealth" -to improve lives and level the playing field since the progressive movement and Teddy Roosevelt in the very early 1900. It is what has made this country what it is , although we could be better. It appears that to you anyone who is not a lais·sez-faire capitalist and who favors any degree of regulation is a Marxist and that is just as stupid as stupid gets. Capitalists will not regulate themselves. They are out for themselves and themselves only and the rest of us and the good of the country be damned.Interesting how after 8 years of Barack Obama's own words being provided you have no recollection of it. Convenient as well...Interesting how you fail to provide a source to support your bloviating.Yeah....it's fall down hilarious the things you liberals are incapable of "recalling". Always seems to be extraordinarily convenient to coinciding with your left-wing ideology. Just coincidence I guess...
"...I sought out the Marxist professors" - Barack Obama, Dreams from My Father
"....and I think the way you do that is to spread the wealth" - Barack Obama to Joe the Plumber
Oh....and lets not forget that Obama calls card carrying member #47544 of Communist Party U.S.A. his "mentor"!
Now start you're typical liberal nonsense of denying and/or minimizing. Go on...get into full on libtard damage control. Tell us how words don't mean anything. How that's not really what Obama "meant". How that doesn't "prove anything". You know....all of the tired and pitiful libtard excuses. Maybe you can even call me "racist"!
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
TheProgressivePatriot
Platinum Member
This is complete horseshit. The way it works is that if you are going to make allegations against someone, it is incumbent upon you to present the specifics with documentation. You can't just accuse someone of something - be it theft, murder, or being a Marxist, without some evidence, and say that the burden of proof to refute it is on them. You say that in his book, he stated that he " sought out Marxist professors" and maybe he did , but that is out of context and says nothing about his beliefs. Your approach to this is lazy, incompetent and dishonest.Why would I - you've denied video and his book. You'll just deny the link as well. And lets not forget about a card carrying member of Communist Party U.S.A. being Obama's "mentor" according to Obama himself. I notice you're running like hell from that one (like all of the other one's)!STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
Campbell
Gold Member
- Aug 20, 2015
- 3,866
- 650
- 255
Practice saying, "Madame President" It'll give you a leg up on the rest of the Republican party!
P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #949
And it's been presented, junior. For 8 years. This is all stuff that was brought in front of the public 8 years ago. Just because you're ignorant of it, deny it, or too lazy to look it up isn't my problem. It's your problem. The facts don't change just because you deny them.This is complete horseshit. The way it works is that if you are going to make allegations against someone, it is incumbent upon you to present the specifics with documentation. You can't just accuse someone of something - be it theft, murder, or being a Marxist, without some evidence, and say that the burden of proof to refute it is on them. You say that in his book, he stated that he " sought out Marxist professors" and maybe he did , but that is out of context and says nothing about his beliefs. Your approach to this is lazy, incompetent and dishonest.Why would I - you've denied video and his book. You'll just deny the link as well. And lets not forget about a card carrying member of Communist Party U.S.A. being Obama's "mentor" according to Obama himself. I notice you're running like hell from that one (like all of the other one's)!STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #950
What? I can't understand a thing you're saying. You sound just like Charlie Brown's teacher. You're about as intelligent too!
Belive me...even if Hitlery Clinton managed to become president somehow....the only thing I will be calling her is c*nt. It's the only title that she has actually earned!
TheProgressivePatriot
Platinum Member
He is not even considered a Socialist by Socialist! Leave alone a Marxist....Ohhhh.....I get it! You're illiterate. You can't do any research on the internet for yourself. You need someone to spoon feed it to you like a child. My bad....I completely forgot that you are a liberal.STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
“Top U.S. Socialist Says Barack Obama is Not One of Them” by PATRICIA MURPHY Capitol Hill Bureau Chief, is telling: http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/09/10/top-socialists-agree-obama-is-not-a-socialist/
Frank Llewellyn, the National Director of the Democratic Socialists of America, the country's largest socialist organization, said Obama is most definitely not one of them. "He's not any kind of socialist at all. He called the president "a market guy," which is hardly a compliment coming from a man with serious reservations about market capitalism.
"He's not challenging the power of the corporations," Llewellyn added. "The banking reforms that have been suggested are not particularly far reaching. “Llewellyn offered his belief that Republicans have historically called opponents "socialists" in order to stop moderate reforms, and that the new stickiness of the Obama/socialist association is one part misinformation, one part ignorance. "The Republicans are doing the same thing they did when Roosevelt was president -- confusing somebody who is trying to save capitalism from itself with somebody who is trying to destroy it. (Obama) is not trying to destroy capitalism."
So how then can Obama be portrayed as a socialist? There is the affordable care act which does in fact involve additional taxes, and regulations on the health care industry. However, it hardly the government take over that its been called. The insurance companies and pharmaceuticals are alive and well. It is not a single-payer system and it is still very much for profit.
He does advocated the “redistribution of wealth” through tax policies and social safety net programs but so did many others before him and he has not advocated the “collective ownership of the means of production” nor has he seriously curtailed the accumulation and concentration of wealth.
And while, he took steps to regulate the financial industry, advocates protecting the environment, and supports labor unions, that should all sound pretty familiar-and mainstream after reviewing the records of some of his predecessors.
It is also worthy of note that during his administration, the top marginal tax rate of 35% is the lowest since the Reagan years. Between WWII until the Reagan Presidency, the rates ranged from 70% to 91 %. Likewise, the capital gains tax rate of 15% for individuals is at its lowest since 1941. And while the capital gains tax on corporations is historically high at 35%, that has been the rate since the Clinton administration and was only slightly lower at 34% from Reagan’s second term through much of Bush 41’s time in office. It should also be noted that this tax was raised from 28% under Reagan during his first term.
If Obama is, by some measure a Socialist, it is only in the long tradition of United States Presidents using government to level the playing field and improve the lives of people. There is no evidence whatsoever to support accusations that Obama is a Marxist and while not a pure Capitalist, he is no more of Socialist than many who came before him beginning with Teddy Roosevelt. In the case of Obama, the labels of “Socialist” and “Marxist “ stems from an ignorance these terms, as well as of history, distrust and fear of someone who is seen as different, and a measure of anti government hysteria and clinically diagnosable paranoia. The fear is simply not reality based.
R
rdean
Guest
America has near record 5.8 million job openings
Looks like it's not jobs we need, but educated workers to fill existing jobs.
That leaves out the GOP..
Looks like it's not jobs we need, but educated workers to fill existing jobs.
That leaves out the GOP..
Campbell
Gold Member
- Aug 20, 2015
- 3,866
- 650
- 255
You appear to have left out the fact that the market crashed in 1929. When George W. Bush crashed the markets he handed them $780 billion to ease the pain. In the 20's crash all the banks closed their doors and the rich people set on their asses and lived off their savings while the poor people spent their days trying to get enough food to survive:
P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #954
Doh! I completely forgot....we should add the appointment of self-admitted communist Van Jones to the White House! Boy...tons of coincidences, uh? He was mentored by a communist, he sought out marxists professors in college, he is on video stating "...I think the way you do that is to spread the wealth" and he appointed a communist to the White House under his administration.He is not even considered a Socialist by Socialist! Leave alone a Marxist....Ohhhh.....I get it! You're illiterate. You can't do any research on the internet for yourself. You need someone to spoon feed it to you like a child. My bad....I completely forgot that you are a liberal.STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
“Top U.S. Socialist Says Barack Obama is Not One of Them” by PATRICIA MURPHY Capitol Hill Bureau Chief, is telling: http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/09/10/top-socialists-agree-obama-is-not-a-socialist/
Frank Llewellyn, the National Director of the Democratic Socialists of America, the country's largest socialist organization, said Obama is most definitely not one of them. "He's not any kind of socialist at all. He called the president "a market guy," which is hardly a compliment coming from a man with serious reservations about market capitalism.
"He's not challenging the power of the corporations," Llewellyn added. "The banking reforms that have been suggested are not particularly far reaching. “Llewellyn offered his belief that Republicans have historically called opponents "socialists" in order to stop moderate reforms, and that the new stickiness of the Obama/socialist association is one part misinformation, one part ignorance. "The Republicans are doing the same thing they did when Roosevelt was president -- confusing somebody who is trying to save capitalism from itself with somebody who is trying to destroy it. (Obama) is not trying to destroy capitalism."
So how then can Obama be portrayed as a socialist? There is the affordable care act which does in fact involve additional taxes, and regulations on the health care industry. However, it hardly the government take over that its been called. The insurance companies and pharmaceuticals are alive and well. It is not a single-payer system and it is still very much for profit.
He does advocated the “redistribution of wealth” through tax policies and social safety net programs but so did many others before him and he has not advocated the “collective ownership of the means of production” nor has he seriously curtailed the accumulation and concentration of wealth.
And while, he took steps to regulate the financial industry, advocates protecting the environment, and supports labor unions, that should all sound pretty familiar-and mainstream after reviewing the records of some of his predecessors.
It is also worthy of note that during his administration, the top marginal tax rate of 35% is the lowest since the Reagan years. Between WWII until the Reagan Presidency, the rates ranged from 70% to 91 %. Likewise, the capital gains tax rate of 15% for individuals is at its lowest since 1941. And while the capital gains tax on corporations is historically high at 35%, that has been the rate since the Clinton administration and was only slightly lower at 34% from Reagan’s second term through much of Bush 41’s time in office. It should also be noted that this tax was raised from 28% under Reagan during his first term.
If Obama is, by some measure a Socialist, it is only in the long tradition of United States Presidents using government to level the playing field and improve the lives of people. There is no evidence whatsoever to support accusations that Obama is a Marxist and while not a pure Capitalist, he is no more of Socialist than many who came before him beginning with Teddy Roosevelt. In the case of Obama, the labels of “Socialist” and “Marxist “ stems from an ignorance these terms, as well as of history, distrust and fear of someone who is seen as different, and a measure of anti government hysteria and clinically diagnosable paranoia. The fear is simply not reality based.
That guy has the worst luck I've ever seen. I've been alive a long time and have never met an actual communist. Seems Obama can't go anywhere without running into one or hiring one.
TheProgressivePatriot
Platinum Member
I'm not going to waist my time playing this juvenile game with you sonny boy. As for "junior" I'll have you know that I'm 69 years young and have been around the block a few times.And it's been presented, junior. For 8 years. This is all stuff that was brought in front of the public 8 years ago. Just because you're ignorant of it, deny it, or too lazy to look it up isn't my problem. It's your problem. The facts don't change just because you deny them.This is complete horseshit. The way it works is that if you are going to make allegations against someone, it is incumbent upon you to present the specifics with documentation. You can't just accuse someone of something - be it theft, murder, or being a Marxist, without some evidence, and say that the burden of proof to refute it is on them. You say that in his book, he stated that he " sought out Marxist professors" and maybe he did , but that is out of context and says nothing about his beliefs. Your approach to this is lazy, incompetent and dishonest.Why would I - you've denied video and his book. You'll just deny the link as well. And lets not forget about a card carrying member of Communist Party U.S.A. being Obama's "mentor" according to Obama himself. I notice you're running like hell from that one (like all of the other one's)!STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #957
I believe that. But you act like a juvenile (like most liberals) by denying reality.I'm not going to waist my time playing this juvenile game with you sonny boy. As for "junior" I'll have you know that I'm 69 years young and have been around the block a few times.And it's been presented, junior. For 8 years. This is all stuff that was brought in front of the public 8 years ago. Just because you're ignorant of it, deny it, or too lazy to look it up isn't my problem. It's your problem. The facts don't change just because you deny them.This is complete horseshit. The way it works is that if you are going to make allegations against someone, it is incumbent upon you to present the specifics with documentation. You can't just accuse someone of something - be it theft, murder, or being a Marxist, without some evidence, and say that the burden of proof to refute it is on them. You say that in his book, he stated that he " sought out Marxist professors" and maybe he did , but that is out of context and says nothing about his beliefs. Your approach to this is lazy, incompetent and dishonest.Why would I - you've denied video and his book. You'll just deny the link as well. And lets not forget about a card carrying member of Communist Party U.S.A. being Obama's "mentor" according to Obama himself. I notice you're running like hell from that one (like all of the other one's)!STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
TheProgressivePatriot
Platinum Member
Another moronic appeal to ignorance.Doh! I completely forgot....we should add the appointment of self-admitted communist Van Jones to the White House! Boy...tons of coincidences, uh? He was mentored by a communist, he sought out marxists professors in college, he is on video stating "...I think the way you do that is to spread the wealth" and he appointed a communist to the White House under his administration.He is not even considered a Socialist by Socialist! Leave alone a Marxist....Ohhhh.....I get it! You're illiterate. You can't do any research on the internet for yourself. You need someone to spoon feed it to you like a child. My bad....I completely forgot that you are a liberal.STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
“Top U.S. Socialist Says Barack Obama is Not One of Them” by PATRICIA MURPHY Capitol Hill Bureau Chief, is telling: http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/09/10/top-socialists-agree-obama-is-not-a-socialist/
Frank Llewellyn, the National Director of the Democratic Socialists of America, the country's largest socialist organization, said Obama is most definitely not one of them. "He's not any kind of socialist at all. He called the president "a market guy," which is hardly a compliment coming from a man with serious reservations about market capitalism.
"He's not challenging the power of the corporations," Llewellyn added. "The banking reforms that have been suggested are not particularly far reaching. “Llewellyn offered his belief that Republicans have historically called opponents "socialists" in order to stop moderate reforms, and that the new stickiness of the Obama/socialist association is one part misinformation, one part ignorance. "The Republicans are doing the same thing they did when Roosevelt was president -- confusing somebody who is trying to save capitalism from itself with somebody who is trying to destroy it. (Obama) is not trying to destroy capitalism."
So how then can Obama be portrayed as a socialist? There is the affordable care act which does in fact involve additional taxes, and regulations on the health care industry. However, it hardly the government take over that its been called. The insurance companies and pharmaceuticals are alive and well. It is not a single-payer system and it is still very much for profit.
He does advocated the “redistribution of wealth” through tax policies and social safety net programs but so did many others before him and he has not advocated the “collective ownership of the means of production” nor has he seriously curtailed the accumulation and concentration of wealth.
And while, he took steps to regulate the financial industry, advocates protecting the environment, and supports labor unions, that should all sound pretty familiar-and mainstream after reviewing the records of some of his predecessors.
It is also worthy of note that during his administration, the top marginal tax rate of 35% is the lowest since the Reagan years. Between WWII until the Reagan Presidency, the rates ranged from 70% to 91 %. Likewise, the capital gains tax rate of 15% for individuals is at its lowest since 1941. And while the capital gains tax on corporations is historically high at 35%, that has been the rate since the Clinton administration and was only slightly lower at 34% from Reagan’s second term through much of Bush 41’s time in office. It should also be noted that this tax was raised from 28% under Reagan during his first term.
If Obama is, by some measure a Socialist, it is only in the long tradition of United States Presidents using government to level the playing field and improve the lives of people. There is no evidence whatsoever to support accusations that Obama is a Marxist and while not a pure Capitalist, he is no more of Socialist than many who came before him beginning with Teddy Roosevelt. In the case of Obama, the labels of “Socialist” and “Marxist “ stems from an ignorance these terms, as well as of history, distrust and fear of someone who is seen as different, and a measure of anti government hysteria and clinically diagnosable paranoia. The fear is simply not reality based.
That guy has the worst luck I've ever seen. I've been alive a long time and have never met an actual communist. Seems Obama can't go anywhere without running into one or hiring one.
Lakhota
Diamond Member
Well, that obviously leaves out Trump's "poorly educated" base.
Lakhota
Diamond Member
Another moronic appeal to ignorance.Doh! I completely forgot....we should add the appointment of self-admitted communist Van Jones to the White House! Boy...tons of coincidences, uh? He was mentored by a communist, he sought out marxists professors in college, he is on video stating "...I think the way you do that is to spread the wealth" and he appointed a communist to the White House under his administration.He is not even considered a Socialist by Socialist! Leave alone a Marxist....Ohhhh.....I get it! You're illiterate. You can't do any research on the internet for yourself. You need someone to spoon feed it to you like a child. My bad....I completely forgot that you are a liberal.STILL! NO LINK!No documentation? We have him on video and he stated in his own book "I sought out the marxist professors"
Just like a Bill Clinton liberal "deny, deny, deny"
“Top U.S. Socialist Says Barack Obama is Not One of Them” by PATRICIA MURPHY Capitol Hill Bureau Chief, is telling: http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/09/10/top-socialists-agree-obama-is-not-a-socialist/
Frank Llewellyn, the National Director of the Democratic Socialists of America, the country's largest socialist organization, said Obama is most definitely not one of them. "He's not any kind of socialist at all. He called the president "a market guy," which is hardly a compliment coming from a man with serious reservations about market capitalism.
"He's not challenging the power of the corporations," Llewellyn added. "The banking reforms that have been suggested are not particularly far reaching. “Llewellyn offered his belief that Republicans have historically called opponents "socialists" in order to stop moderate reforms, and that the new stickiness of the Obama/socialist association is one part misinformation, one part ignorance. "The Republicans are doing the same thing they did when Roosevelt was president -- confusing somebody who is trying to save capitalism from itself with somebody who is trying to destroy it. (Obama) is not trying to destroy capitalism."
So how then can Obama be portrayed as a socialist? There is the affordable care act which does in fact involve additional taxes, and regulations on the health care industry. However, it hardly the government take over that its been called. The insurance companies and pharmaceuticals are alive and well. It is not a single-payer system and it is still very much for profit.
He does advocated the “redistribution of wealth” through tax policies and social safety net programs but so did many others before him and he has not advocated the “collective ownership of the means of production” nor has he seriously curtailed the accumulation and concentration of wealth.
And while, he took steps to regulate the financial industry, advocates protecting the environment, and supports labor unions, that should all sound pretty familiar-and mainstream after reviewing the records of some of his predecessors.
It is also worthy of note that during his administration, the top marginal tax rate of 35% is the lowest since the Reagan years. Between WWII until the Reagan Presidency, the rates ranged from 70% to 91 %. Likewise, the capital gains tax rate of 15% for individuals is at its lowest since 1941. And while the capital gains tax on corporations is historically high at 35%, that has been the rate since the Clinton administration and was only slightly lower at 34% from Reagan’s second term through much of Bush 41’s time in office. It should also be noted that this tax was raised from 28% under Reagan during his first term.
If Obama is, by some measure a Socialist, it is only in the long tradition of United States Presidents using government to level the playing field and improve the lives of people. There is no evidence whatsoever to support accusations that Obama is a Marxist and while not a pure Capitalist, he is no more of Socialist than many who came before him beginning with Teddy Roosevelt. In the case of Obama, the labels of “Socialist” and “Marxist “ stems from an ignorance these terms, as well as of history, distrust and fear of someone who is seen as different, and a measure of anti government hysteria and clinically diagnosable paranoia. The fear is simply not reality based.
That guy has the worst luck I've ever seen. I've been alive a long time and have never met an actual communist. Seems Obama can't go anywhere without running into one or hiring one.
NaziCons are a special breed.
Similar threads
