Not Even CLOSE - Cain wooped ASS

GHook93

Aristotle
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
20,150
Reaction score
3,508
Points
290
Location
Chicago
Romney was a distant 2nd. Perry looked like a clueless George W Bush!!!

I did like that Perry, Huntsman and it appears like Romney have Cain as a VP pick!
 

Avorysuds

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
13,834
Reaction score
1,658
Points
245
Location
Eugene Oregon
Meh, he jokes a lot to be honest. There is a serious lack of depth and people see that.
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,122
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
Cain whooped ass? i must have seen a different debate. I dont think he did bad. But I hardly think he whooped ass. In fact, i thought his response to that question about a Post Cain Presidency increasing more taxes was extremely poor.
 

Avorysuds

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
13,834
Reaction score
1,658
Points
245
Location
Eugene Oregon
Cain whooped ass? i must have seen a different debate. I dont think he did bad. But I hardly think he whooped ass. In fact, i thought his response to that question about a Post Cain Presidency increasing more taxes was extremely poor.
To me that is what I talk about when I say I don't like Cain. Sure he has catchy ideas but then what? what if he does not get what he wants?
 
R

rdean

Guest
Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.
 
OP
GHook93

GHook93

Aristotle
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
20,150
Reaction score
3,508
Points
290
Location
Chicago
Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.
Don't talk about what you don't know about! I have challenged you to actually read about the fair tax from my signature, but as a weak minded welfare troll you refuse to do so!
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,122
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.
Don't talk about what you don't know about! I have challenged you to actually read about the fair tax from my signature, but as a weak minded welfare troll you refuse to do so!
What's ironic is that it would do exactly what he wants to do: Make the rich pay more.

See the more you consume, the more you pay. It's a great incentive to be frugal.
 

Cuyo

Training a Guineapig army
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
5,681
Reaction score
992
Points
98
Location
Denver, PA
I didn't watch, but I assure you, Cain did not whoop ass.

He's a lunatic. Lunatics don't whoop ass. They may be amusing sometimes, but they don't generally win debates.
 

The Infidel

EVIL CONSERVATIVE
Joined
May 19, 2010
Messages
17,252
Reaction score
3,323
Points
48
Location
AMERITOPIA
Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.

BS - there would be NO income tax




Oh wait.... they dont pay that either :eusa_whistle:


FAIR SHARE HUH?
 

The Infidel

EVIL CONSERVATIVE
Joined
May 19, 2010
Messages
17,252
Reaction score
3,323
Points
48
Location
AMERITOPIA
Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.
Don't talk about what you don't know about! I have challenged you to actually read about the fair tax from my signature, but as a weak minded welfare troll you refuse to do so!
What's ironic is that it would do exactly what he wants to do: Make the rich pay more.

See the more you consume, the more you pay. It's a great incentive to be frugal.
It would also make it so that EVERYBODY pays.... that includes drug dealers or anyone else who launders cash.
 
OP
GHook93

GHook93

Aristotle
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
20,150
Reaction score
3,508
Points
290
Location
Chicago
Cain whooped ass? i must have seen a different debate. I dont think he did bad. But I hardly think he whooped ass. In fact, i thought his response to that question about a Post Cain Presidency increasing more taxes was extremely poor.
His 9-9-9 plan is brilliant. His using the Chilean Social Security system as the model for ours is BEYOND brilliant. Getting rid of the EPA and stating a new one from the ground up is EXACTLY what the country needs.
 
OP
GHook93

GHook93

Aristotle
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
20,150
Reaction score
3,508
Points
290
Location
Chicago
Wooping on MSNBC

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Dq1kHXqHo8]Herman Cain Takes On Entire MSNBC Roundtable After Debate - YouTube[/ame]
 

Cuyo

Training a Guineapig army
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
5,681
Reaction score
992
Points
98
Location
Denver, PA
Cain whooped ass? i must have seen a different debate. I dont think he did bad. But I hardly think he whooped ass. In fact, i thought his response to that question about a Post Cain Presidency increasing more taxes was extremely poor.
His 9-9-9 plan is brilliant. His using the Chilean Social Security system as the model for ours is BEYOND brilliant. Getting rid of the EPA and stating a new one from the ground up is EXACTLY what the country needs.
:lmao:

You're NOT fucking serious! :laugh2:

9-9-9. So obvious this goon has a background in retail.
 

USArmyRetired

Rookie
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
360
Points
0
I'm sorry, but the experiment at having a negro as president has failed. We don't need to do it again. We need to stick with presidential tradition of having a white in power of the most powerful office on earth.
 

The Infidel

EVIL CONSERVATIVE
Joined
May 19, 2010
Messages
17,252
Reaction score
3,323
Points
48
Location
AMERITOPIA
I'm sorry, but the experiment at having a negro as president has failed. We don't need to do it again. We need to stick with presidential tradition of having a white in power of the most powerful office on earth.

Ya just had to go there didnt ya?

Damn it!
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,122
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
Cain whooped ass? i must have seen a different debate. I dont think he did bad. But I hardly think he whooped ass. In fact, i thought his response to that question about a Post Cain Presidency increasing more taxes was extremely poor.
His 9-9-9 plan is brilliant. His using the Chilean Social Security system as the model for ours is BEYOND brilliant. Getting rid of the EPA and stating a new one from the ground up is EXACTLY what the country needs.
Adding a National Sales tax is brilliant?

Dont get me wrong, Im all for getting our taxes below 10%. But when you have three separate taxes at 9%. We end up paying about 27%. And his answer why future Presidents simply couldnt raise all the rates was incredibly stupid.
 

Avorysuds

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
13,834
Reaction score
1,658
Points
245
Location
Eugene Oregon
Cain whooped ass? i must have seen a different debate. I dont think he did bad. But I hardly think he whooped ass. In fact, i thought his response to that question about a Post Cain Presidency increasing more taxes was extremely poor.
His 9-9-9 plan is brilliant. His using the Chilean Social Security system as the model for ours is BEYOND brilliant. Getting rid of the EPA and stating a new one from the ground up is EXACTLY what the country needs.
Adding a National Sales tax is brilliant?

Dont get me wrong, Im all for getting our taxes below 10%. But when you have three separate taxes at 9%. We end up paying about 27%. And his answer why future Presidents simply couldnt raise all the rates was incredibly stupid.
I'll be honest... When Cain says 9-9-9 plan I think he came up with this idea while looking at a pizza coupon for his company. A large Pizza, Drink and bread sticks all for just 9.99
And yes, I always thought 27% taxes is kind of a lot.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top