Not Darwin's Law, it's God's Law.

[Boss]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

 

[Dante]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

The Bible is not ambivalent about evolution. It says God ripped a rib out of Adam and Presto! Eve. God created the world in what was it, 6 days?

 

[the_human_being]

There's very little difference between an atheist and an evolutionist, but I do admit there is some little difference, The atheist readily professes there is no God nor a Satan. This is fine with Satan. Satan could care less just as long as the atheist keeps on bashing God and he has the atheist's soul firmly within his grasp.

The evolutionist on the other hand, is really not comfortable totally denying the existence of God and Satan. The evolutionist recognizes that if he denies God, then God will deny him. He wavers and waffles. The evolutionist only denies that God had anything at all to do with creation.

Both are toast.

 

[the_human_being]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

You evolutionist really do need to get together and come up with ONE doctrine. You guys have so many different takes on your own theory it's impossible to follow all of them.

 

[Dante]

Satan? Is that anything like Satin?

 

[Dante]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

You evolutionist really do need to get together and come up with ONE doctrine. You guys have so many different takes on your own theory it's impossible to follow all of them.

How many sects of christianity are there?

 

[the_human_being]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

You evolutionist really do need to get together and come up with ONE doctrine. You guys have so many different takes on your own theory it's impossible to follow all of them.

How many sects of christianity are there?

I have no idea and really don't care. All of them that I know of support that God is the creator, making all of them of one accord in this issue. You guys say it was a spontaneous creation of life, something crawled out of a cesspool of slime, it was a chemical creation of life which has never been duplicated in the finest of laboratories, a single asexual cell mutated and divided over billions and billions of years, and now whatever wild proposition you are now putting forth. It's totally ridiculous! Pick ONE please and stick with it.

 

[Dante]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

You evolutionist really do need to get together and come up with ONE doctrine. You guys have so many different takes on your own theory it's impossible to follow all of them.

How many sects of christianity are there?

I have no idea and really don't care. All of them that I know of support that God is the creator, making all of them of one accord in this issue. You guys say it was a spontaneous creation of life, something crawled out of a cesspool of slime, it was a chemical creation of life which has never been duplicated in the finest of laboratories, a single asexual cell mutated and divided over billions and billions of years, and now whatever wild proposition you are now putting forth. It's totally ridiculous! Pick ONE please and stick with it.

God is a figment of the human imagination. That does not disprove a creation or creator. but YOUR God is make believe/

 

[PredFan]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

Hmmm...why can't others who believe in Creationism separate the two like that? Instead they attack evolution, which you say comes from life, with creation, from which life comes. Have you also done that?

 

[PredFan]

There's very little difference between an atheist and an evolutionist, but I do admit there is some little difference, The atheist readily professes there is no God nor a Satan. This is fine with Satan. Satan could care less just as long as the atheist keeps on bashing God and he has the atheist's soul firmly within his grasp.

The evolutionist on the other hand, is really not comfortable totally denying the existence of God and Satan. The evolutionist recognizes that if he denies God, then God will deny him. He wavers and waffles. The evolutionist only denies that God had anything at all to do with creation.

Both are toast.

I believe in God and in evolution. I am definitely not an atheist.

 

[Boss]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

The Bible is not ambivalent about evolution. It says God ripped a rib out of Adam and Presto! Eve. God created the world in what was it, 6 days?

I didn't say "ambivalent" I said "ambiguous."

The Bible does not say "God ripped a rib out, etc." that is your loose interpretation. As is your interpretation of "6 days" according to the creation story. The original Hebrew text uses the word "yom" instead of "day" and a "yom" can be anything from a day to an era of history. It is a highly unspecified amount of time.

One way we know the Bible can't be literally talking about 24hr days is because of the chronology presented. It wasn't until the third "day" that God created the sun. How can the Earth have what we understand as "days" before there is a sun?

Finally, we are presented this story as imagined from God's perspective, not our own. There were no humans here to record and document the events. The purpose of the story is not to evaluate the time line or critique the interpretations for factual scientific accuracy, it is to convey to people what God did.

 

[Boss]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

Hmmm...why can't others who believe in Creationism separate the two like that? Instead they attack evolution, which you say comes from life, with creation, from which life comes. Have you also done that?

I can't speak for why others do things or make other arguments. However, I see plenty of Atheists trying to argue Evolution over Creation as if that's the argument. One doesn't negate the other, they are about two entirely different things, in my opinion.

I marvel at things like evolution and DNA because it's evidence of how brilliant God is. I'm not a religious person, don't want religious stuff taught in schools, but I think we should teach the theories about origin, which include creation and intelligent design. The main reason Atheists oppose this is because they don't have a solid scientific counter for it. They do real well at promoting Evolution, but the best scientific explanations for origin of life are Abiogenesis. Literally, it means NOT-biogenesis (life comes from life). So you basically have the theory of creation which science can't explore or a theory based on something contradicting science principles in general. I think we should teach this question is unknown, and here are the possibilities.

 

[Dante]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

The Bible is not ambivalent about evolution. It says God ripped a rib out of Adam and Presto! Eve. God created the world in what was it, 6 days?

I didn't say "ambivalent" I said "ambiguous."

The Bible does not say "God ripped a rib out, etc." that is your loose interpretation. As is your interpretation of "6 days" according to the creation story. The original Hebrew text uses the word "yom" instead of "day" and a "yom" can be anything from a day to an era of history. It is a highly unspecified amount of time.

One way we know the Bible can't be literally talking about 24hr days is because of the chronology presented. It wasn't until the third "day" that God created the sun. How can the Earth have what we understand as "days" before there is a sun?

Finally, we are presented this story as imagined from God's perspective, not our own. There were no humans here to record and document the events. The purpose of the story is not to evaluate the time line or critique the interpretations for factual scientific accuracy, it is to convey to people what God did.

The Bible is not ambiguous about evolution. It says God ripped a rib out of Adam and Presto! Eve. God created the world in what was it, 6 days?

A yom can be anything? How convenient. If the Bible doesn't make sense it doesn't make sense. God's perspective? To convey to people what God did?

Fantastic! The reason the Bible makes little sense isn't because of faith or religion -- it makes no sense because the people who wrote it lived during an era when the science of the day knew very little to what we know

 

[Dante]

why is it so hard to accept that Evolution is how God created living things?

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

Hmmm...why can't others who believe in Creationism separate the two like that? Instead they attack evolution, which you say comes from life, with creation, from which life comes. Have you also done that?

I can't speak for why others do things or make other arguments. However, I see plenty of Atheists trying to argue Evolution over Creation as if that's the argument. One doesn't negate the other, they are about two entirely different things, in my opinion

Two entirely different things: one is a scientific theory. The other is a religious based bed time story

 

[Dante]

There's very little difference between an atheist and an evolutionist, but I do admit there is some little difference, The atheist readily professes there is no God nor a Satan. This is fine with Satan. Satan could care less just as long as the atheist keeps on bashing God and he has the atheist's soul firmly within his grasp.

The evolutionist on the other hand, is really not comfortable totally denying the existence of God and Satan. The evolutionist recognizes that if he denies God, then God will deny him. He wavers and waffles. The evolutionist only denies that God had anything at all to do with creation.

Both are toast.

I believe in God and in evolution. I am definitely not an atheist.

God is your belief. Evolution is a scientific theory you accept

 

[BreezeWood]

.
evolution is circumstantial to its environment, the proximity of earth to the sun and is for the same reason not a creation but an inevitable reaction over time.

the creationist have nothing than life to exemplify creationist theory such as an inert sculpture similarly formed as living organisms that would verify creation rather than a circumstantial reaction.

.

 

[Dante]

.
evolution is circumstantial to its environment, the proximity of earth to the sun and is for the same reason not a creation but an inevitable reaction over time.

the creationist have nothing than life to exemplify creationist theory such as an inert sculpture similarly formed as living organisms that would verify creation rather than a circumstantial reaction.

.

correction:

creationism is NOT a scientific theory or even a theory

 

[the_human_being]

It's not in the bible

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

You evolutionist really do need to get together and come up with ONE doctrine. You guys have so many different takes on your own theory it's impossible to follow all of them.

How many sects of christianity are there?

I have no idea and really don't care. All of them that I know of support that God is the creator, making all of them of one accord in this issue. You guys say it was a spontaneous creation of life, something crawled out of a cesspool of slime, it was a chemical creation of life which has never been duplicated in the finest of laboratories, a single asexual cell mutated and divided over billions and billions of years, and now whatever wild proposition you are now putting forth. It's totally ridiculous! Pick ONE please and stick with it.

God is a figment of the human imagination. That does not disprove a creation or creator. but YOUR God is make believe/

Then who was the Creator? Does He have a name in your religion? The Great Spirit? The Great Crocodile? Zeus? Al Sharpton?

 

[the_human_being]

.
evolution is circumstantial to its environment, the proximity of earth to the sun and is for the same reason not a creation but an inevitable reaction over time.

the creationist have nothing than life to exemplify creationist theory such as an inert sculpture similarly formed as living organisms that would verify creation rather than a circumstantial reaction.

.

Do you even realize that the position of the earth to enable the support of life as we know it is in and of itself a mathematical impossibility? Actually, it is the evolutionists who have nothing to support how life began or even how your Big Bang came about except conjecture. You cannot explain how either mass or energy came from nothing.

 

[Dante]

Not true, the Bible is ambiguous regarding how God created things.

The problem is, evolution doesn't explain creation. Evolution is something that happens to the things that are already created and existing. Life comes from creation and evolution comes from life.

You evolutionist really do need to get together and come up with ONE doctrine. You guys have so many different takes on your own theory it's impossible to follow all of them.

How many sects of christianity are there?

I have no idea and really don't care. All of them that I know of support that God is the creator, making all of them of one accord in this issue. You guys say it was a spontaneous creation of life, something crawled out of a cesspool of slime, it was a chemical creation of life which has never been duplicated in the finest of laboratories, a single asexual cell mutated and divided over billions and billions of years, and now whatever wild proposition you are now putting forth. It's totally ridiculous! Pick ONE please and stick with it.

God is a figment of the human imagination. That does not disprove a creation or creator. but YOUR God is make believe/

Then who was the Creator? Does He have a name in your religion? The Great Spirit? The Great Crocodile? Zeus? Al Sharpton?

Who? an accident can create something. I drop a vial of something and it mixes with something else to form something new. I did not create anything. Creation does not demand intent. An accident can create something new with no intent involved