North Dakota Judge Vacates State Abortion Ban, Ruling It Is Unconstitutional.

So just I read the article, and it starts and ends w/his opinion that it was the pill and nothing else that caused the young woman's untimely demise.

I'll note that he's no medical doctor, but a partisan opinion writer w/an anti-abortion agenda.

Interesting read though. It's informative to see how these types attempt to spin facts in their favor.
 
So just I read the article, and it starts and ends w/his opinion that it was the pill and nothing else that caused the young woman's untimely demise.

I'll note that he's no medical doctor, but a partisan opinion writer w/an anti-abortion agenda.

Interesting read though. It's informative to see how these types attempt to spin facts in their favor.
You need to stop with the bolded words if you expect me to read your posts... enough... now grow up...
 
Nobody, not even the fetuses, can losecwhen the voters in each state decide
 
You need to stop with the bolded words if you expect me to read your posts... enough... now grow up...

Dude, he's trying to stand out. He doesn't have the IQ of a housebrick, so he has to do SOMETHING to make his posts stand out. They never have substance, so maybe if he bolds a random word every now and then, you'll be distracted by that and not notice that his posts never actually SAY anything.
 
A judge vacated North Dakota’s abortion ban in a Thursday ruling, finding the law unconstitutionally vague and an infringement on medical freedom.


South Central Judicial District Court Judge Bruce Romanick’s order came as part of a lawsuit challenging the law brought last year by reproductive health care doctors and an abortion clinic.

Romanick declared the law “unconstitutionally void for vagueness” and found that “pregnant women in North Dakota have a fundamental right to choose abortion before viability exists.”

The ban, enacted by the Legislature in 2023, makes abortion illegal in all cases except rape or incest if the mother has been pregnant for less than six weeks, or when the pregnancy poses a serious physical health threat.
Seems pretty cut and dry.

"The plaintiffs, which include reproductive health care doctors and the Moorhead, Minnesota-based Red River Women’s Clinic, in their complaint said the law not only infringes on individual rights, but also puts health care providers in danger by not specifying when an abortion may be performed for health reasons."

I.E.

Unconstitionally vague
 
I can't wait to see how the election goes for Republicans in North Dakota. And every state. If you vote GOP you better be prepared for your state banning abortion. No question about it.
Many red states have banned abortion, and many other states limited it. Other red states have enshrined a state constitutional right to abortion. Many blue states have basically given up and allowed abortion on demand. Isn't democracy wonderful!
 
They're not victims you incredible Dipshits.... they're called voters. You might want to try not dismissing their concerns out of hand if you want to remain a viable political party.... :lol:
The only people who should support the right to abortion are those women between the age of 18 and 40, single and are too lazy to use birth control, and their baby Daddies. Most of them are NOT voters.
 
The only people who should support the right to abortion are those women between the age of 18 and 40, single and are too lazy to use birth control, and their baby Daddies. Most of them are NOT voters.
So nothing to worry about then MAGAts. Kick your feet up with some Mai Tai..... :lol:
 
Many red states have banned abortion, and many other states limited it. Other red states have enshrined a state constitutional right to abortion. Many blue states have basically given up and allowed abortion on demand. Isn't democracy wonderful!

Well, I'll say this. It's now a big issue in ever red state. I love it. Should eventually turn those states blue. And if it doesn't then women in those states must want it.

And those states will lose a lot of business and good doctors. Companies don't move to states that ban abortion. They leave states that ban abortion.

So yes, democracy is wonderful.
 
Nobody, not even the fetuses, can losecwhen the voters in each state decide
Civil rights are never subject to a vote. The fetus is every bit as similar to a newborn and therefore should be afforded the same rights.
 
The only people who should support the right to abortion are those women between the age of 18 and 40, single and are too lazy to use birth control, and their baby Daddies. Most of them are NOT voters.
How stupid.

17 year Olds will be 18 soon.

41 year olds know and love peope that are 40.
 
A judge vacated North Dakota’s abortion ban in a Thursday ruling, finding the law unconstitutionally vague and an infringement on medical freedom.


South Central Judicial District Court Judge Bruce Romanick’s order came as part of a lawsuit challenging the law brought last year by reproductive health care doctors and an abortion clinic.

Romanick declared the law “unconstitutionally void for vagueness” and found that “pregnant women in North Dakota have a fundamental right to choose abortion before viability exists.”

The ban, enacted by the Legislature in 2023, makes abortion illegal in all cases except rape or incest if the mother has been pregnant for less than six weeks, or when the pregnancy poses a serious physical health threat.
What’s interesting is that some states’ constitutions have provisions for privacy rights – constitutions ratified long before the rise of the Christo fascist right and conservative authoritarianism, when conservatives actually believed in limited government and individual liberty.
 
Back
Top Bottom