Noahide Laws PL 102-14 Are they constitutional?

PeterPilot

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2023
Messages
4,836
Reaction score
3,223
Points
1,938

I had heard the term before but didn't understand what they were. Paul Roberts details legislative history. I think they are unconstitutional, a blatant violation of First Amendment principles.
 

I had heard the term before but didn't understand what they were. Paul Roberts details legislative history. I think they are unconstitutional, a blatant violation of First Amendment principles.
Huh? They are not a part of your Constitution, at least not explicitly stated.

There are 7 laws of Noah, fairly basic with some overlap with the 10 Commandments.
 

I had heard the term before but didn't understand what they were. Paul Roberts details legislative history. I think they are unconstitutional, a blatant violation of First Amendment principles.
 
Huh? They are not a part of your Constitution, at least not explicitly stated.

There are 7 laws of Noah, fairly basic with some overlap with the 10 Commandments.
No they are not part of the USC. In fact, they are a blatant violation of the First Amendment and the spirit of the last sentence of Article VI
 
This is kind of frightening. Because there's a prophetic theory that in the last days, Noahide laws could be used as a legal framework... (I know this is not the religion section, but I just found this interesting.)

 
This is kind of frightening. Because there's a prophetic theory that in the last days, Noahide laws could be used as a legal framework... (I know this is not the religion section, but I just found this interesting.)



Where do Noahide laws mention that?
 
Where do Noahide laws mention that?

As the tweet says, the punishment is mentioned in the Talmud, not in the list of the Noahide laws itself.

I did an AI search, and here's what it says:

"The Talmud (Sanhedrin 56a–57b) and Maimonides state that any violation of the seven Noahide laws by a gentile is a capital offense, punishable by decapitation (by sword) in a properly constituted court."​


To be clear, I'm not claiming that is going to actually happen. As I said in my previous post, in regard to biblical prophecy, there is a view that in the last days the Noahide laws will be enacted. And IF that is true, obviously a Christian who states Jesus is God could be charged with idolatry, which from a Talmudic standpoint is punishable by death.

And it just occurred to me...IF that theory is true, that goes along with what the bible says in Revelation. There is a specific verse that mentions Christians being beheaded in the last days. Revelation 20:4 talks about the souls of those who were beheaded for their testimony of Jesus and refusal to worship the "beast" during the Tribulation.
 
Last edited:
As the tweet says, the punishment is mentioned in the Talmud, not in the list of the Noahide laws itself.

I did an AI search, and here's what it says:

"The Talmud (Sanhedrin 56a–57b) and Maimonides state that any violation of the seven Noahide laws by a gentile is a capital offense, punishable by decapitation (by sword) in a properly constituted court."​


To be clear, I'm not claiming that is going to actually happen. As I said in my previous post, in regard to biblical prophecy, there is a view that in the last days the Noahide laws will be enacted. And IF that is true, obviously a Christian who states Jesus is God could be charged with idolatry, which from a Talmudic standpoint is punishable by death.

And it just occurred to me...IF that theory is true, that goes along with what the bible says in Revelation. There is a specific verse that mentions Christians being beheaded in the last days. Revelation 20:4 talks about the souls of those who were beheaded for their testimony of Jesus and refusal to worship the "beast" during the Tribulation.

This Maimonides?

"Whenever a court executes a person once in seven years, it is considered a savage court."

 
I said the Talmud. As the tweet said also. Did you not see that part?

Ok, both the Talmud and Maimonides quote the same source, that says:

"A court that executes once in seven years is called "savage".
Rebbi Eliezer ben Azarya says: Once in seventy years."

 
Ok, do you understand both Talmud and Maimonides quote the same source?

According to what I just read online, the statement you posted (about the "savage court") specifically refers to a Jewish Sanhedrin judging fellow Jews. Under Jewish Law, the procedural requirements for the death penalty are nearly impossible to meet.

If that is correct, then it's completely irrelevant to what I said in my previous post.
 
According to what I just read online, the statement you posted (about the "savage court") specifically refers to a Jewish Sanhedrin judging fellow Jews. Under Jewish Law, the procedural requirements for the death penalty are nearly impossible to meet.

If that is correct, then it's completely irrelevant to what I said in my previous post.

Where do you see the distinction?
 
Where do you see the distinction?

Are you denying that there is a dual legal structure, one for Jews and one for non-Jews? (The Noahide laws) Or are you claiming that in regard to the death penalty, there is no distinction? Because while I'm no expert, I can do a search online and see that there are two different systems and they have different legal procedures. And reportedly there is lower evidentiary bar for non-Jews. Are you saying that's not true?

I'm not really here to argue about this. Especially at the moment, since I've already spent too much time on this site today, and I have real life things I should be doing right now. But if you want me to get into the specifics, I'll try to get back to this thread later. Because just from doing a quick search, reportedly there are differences, but I would want to research it more and make sure it's true before posting all the specifics, which will take some time.
 
15th post
Are you denying that there is a dual legal structure, one for Jews and one for non-Jews? (The Noahide laws) Or are you claiming that in regard to the death penalty, there is no distinction? Because while I'm no expert, I can do a search online and see that there are two different systems and they have different legal procedures. And reportedly there is lower evidentiary bar for non-Jews. Are you saying that's not true?

I'm not really here to argue about this. Especially at the moment, since I've already spent too much time on this site today, and I have real life things I should be doing right now. But if you want me to get into the specifics, I'll try to get back to this thread later. Because just from doing a quick search, reportedly there are differences, but I would want to research it more and make sure it's true before posting all the specifics, which will take some time.

Much simpler, this dual structure is already common international law.
Where nations abide by set agreed norms,
and the distinction is local.
 
Where is religion mentioned?
In the legislative record. If you take the time to examine, take the time to read about it, you will find it.


Jewish lobbyists began the process during Reagan's time, and by 1991 their efforts were fulfilled. Just saw a short video last night of the disgusting Talmudic Jew Ben Shapiro talking about it.
 
As the tweet says, the punishment is mentioned in the Talmud, not in the list of the Noahide laws itself.

I did an AI search, and here's what it says:

"The Talmud (Sanhedrin 56a–57b) and Maimonides state that any violation of the seven Noahide laws by a gentile is a capital offense, punishable by decapitation (by sword) in a properly constituted court."​


To be clear, I'm not claiming that is going to actually happen. As I said in my previous post, in regard to biblical prophecy, there is a view that in the last days the Noahide laws will be enacted. And IF that is true, obviously a Christian who states Jesus is God could be charged with idolatry, which from a Talmudic standpoint is punishable by death.

And it just occurred to me...IF that theory is true, that goes along with what the bible says in Revelation. There is a specific verse that mentions Christians being beheaded in the last days. Revelation 20:4 talks about the souls of those who were beheaded for their testimony of Jesus and refusal to worship the "beast" during the Tribulation.
Much ado about nothing. That's NOT how it's going to play out

While you're looking to the "evil Jews", it is BABYLON you need to be watching -- the Great Whore/those who will be saying He is the Christ yet deny the Commandments
 
Huh? They are not a part of your Constitution, at least not explicitly stated.

There are 7 laws of Noah, fairly basic with some overlap with the 10 Commandments.
This is part of modern Judaism and not this nations Christian faith
Your "Noahide Laws are meaningless to me
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom