NOAA's Forecast Model Has A Drop Out Problem

[Old Rocks]

You're just cherry-picking experts who you agree with ... instead of actually educating yourself ... pretty stupid if you're asking me ...

LOL That is Munich Re, one of the largest re-insurance companies in the world. They insure the insurance companies, so they have to keep track of extreme weather events and the frequency of those events.

 

[Old Rocks]

NO that is YOUR lie you are pressing, Trump wants to remove the politics from science research and have researchers regain their independence that was taken away from leftist climate cultists like Dr. Mann, Hansen and the full time grifter Gore.

Here is the article explaining this that you will not read but other better people will,

Why Trump‘s ‘Gold Standard’ Executive Order is Essential to Restoring Truth in Science​

LINK

======

It is a return to producing FALSIFIABLE published research, not barrage of modeling scenarios that is tuned to fit the prevailing paradigm which is normally called pseudoscience.

Trump and truth are not on in the same universe. The man is a congenital liar. And, frankly, quite deep in dementia.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Trump and truth are not on in the same universe. The man is a congenital liar. And, frankly, quite deep in dementia.

Old Rocks and truth are not on in the same universe. The man is a congenital liar. And, frankly quite deep in dementia.

 

[Old Rocks]

What an embarrassing propaganda crap that was, here is straight from official data showing no such increase developing:

===

Storminess has not gone up, and there’s been no increase in hurricane strength or frequency … no “emergency” there.

First, the strength. LINK

View attachment 1128098

And here is the global hurricane frequency, both for all hurricanes and for the strongest hurricanes.

View attachment 1128099

There is much longer evidence to back that up. Here are the records of all hurricanes (left) and major hurricanes (right) that came ashore in the US in the last 150 years … NO increase. SOURCE: Nature magazine.

View attachment 1128102

And here are the numbers of Pacific typhoons (hurricanes) from the Japanese Meteorological Agency.

View attachment 1128103

And here are a century and a half of records of the number of landfalling hurricanes in Florida.

View attachment 1128105

Finally, here are the declining numbers of both strong and average cyclones (Southern Hemisphere hurricanes) in Australian waters, from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM).

View attachment 1128106
===

And here is the Rutgers Snow Labatory’s snow extent data from 1972 to April 2023 … basically, no change.

View attachment 1128108

===

Regarding heat, very hot days in the US (over 100°F, or 38°C) were much higher in the 1930s than at any other time in the last 125 years.

View attachment 1128112

View attachment 1128114

But if you want to worry about heat waves, please get back to me when the heat waves are worse than those of the 1930s, well before the large increase in CO2 …

View attachment 1128120

===

Strong tornadoes in the US are steadily decreasing over the last 72 years.

View attachment 1128116
And the same is true of weaker tornadoes … decreasing.

View attachment 1128118
LINK

======

I have a lot more to show how bad you are in promoting lies and propaganda, but this is enough for normal rational people to understand there is no climate emergency at all.

LOL Lots of graphs. So;

Three days in 2021 in just the Pacific Northwest of above 105 F. In fact, in a little town in BC, the temperature reached 121 degrees, and the town burned down the next day.
As of May, we have had about 700 tornados in the US:

700 tornadoes​

As of May 20, 2025, NOAA has reported 700 tornadoes in the U.S. for the year, including 81 EF-2 or higher tornadoes. There have been 35 tornado-related deaths, with 23 occurring in manufactured homes1. So far in 2025, there have been five EF4 tornadoes recorded, which is on the higher end of the 10-year range2.
Learn more:

Yes, 1934 was a hot year for the US. It was also a cold year in some places. Seneca, Oregon hit -54 F that year. However, worldwide, it was not abnormal. Certainly not like this;

 

[Sunsettommy]

LOL, you didn't refute anything I posted which was about LONG TERM trends thus you failed once again to make an honest reply as you used a he he , ha ha ha, a 3 day weather event that doesn't prove anything in particular.

I happen to live in the state of Washington I am well aware of what happened that year.

Your Tornado babble is for single month, my chart showed a decline over SEVENTY TWO YEARS, you are flailing badly here.

You are terrible at this as I keep making you look bad so easily.

 

[ReinyDays]

LOL That is Munich Re, one of the largest re-insurance companies in the world. They insure the insurance companies, so they have to keep track of extreme weather events and the frequency of those events.

You can do that too ... if you weren't so damn lazy ...

Munich Re is a "for profit" corporation ... they make more profit if they can fool people into paying more, like you ... [ka'ching] ...

 

[Sunsettommy]

It appears that my last post was too much for old rocks to handle and he never addressed the long fact/data filled post I made at all.

Thus once again their climate change propaganda failed and science reality prevails.

 

[Mushroom]

Wow..whole new level of disingenuous:

And what does any of that have to do with the actual statement? Other than spinning in circles and try to distract from the facts?

 

[Mushroom]

So he is critical of the bureaucracy of NOAA. That is how you improve the ability of scientific endeavours. However to quote Dr. Mass as a critic of current knowledge regarding AGW is laughable, from your own link;

That is a typical charge generically laid at the feet of anybody that says something they do not like.

If you can't discuss or refute the evidence, you attack and gaslight.

 

[Sunsettommy]

So he is critical of the bureaucracy of NOAA. That is how you improve the ability of scientific endeavours. However to quote Dr. Mass as a critic of current knowledge regarding AGW is laughable, from your own link;

"Mass has stated publicly that he shares the scientific consensus that global warming is real and that human activity is a major cause of warming trend in the late 20th and 21st centuries. According to Mass, "Global warming is an extraordinarily serious issue, and scientists have a key role to play in communicating what is known and what is not about this critical issue." He has been critical of the Paris Climate accord for not going far enough to address the negative impacts of climate change. Mass has also expressed concern when media outlets and environmental organizations have made, in his opinion, exaggerated claims about the current impacts of climate change. Mass has questioned statements of climate change as the cause of specific weather events. For example, Mass concluded that global warming was not a central factor in the 2021 Western North America heat wave. The authors of a World Weather Attribution report asserting the connection criticized Mass's analysis of their work."

Cliff Mass - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Odd that you did not notice that paragraph. Maybe you were depending on no one actually reading your link?

LOL,

I have long known that he is a lukewarmer who shows real integrity in his presentations he publishes he and my brother met several times in Seattle who tells me favorable impressions of him and I have been reading his blog for years unlike that fraud Mann who lies all over the place a thin skinned leftist jackass who now lost two defamation lawsuits and post second rate science papers that gets torn apart easily hell he is now reduced to whining while real science men have bypassed this failure in recent years.

You posted in this way as a form of deflection away from his valid criticisms of NOAA modeling drop out problem while he also is defending the same organization against budget cuts.

You are a desperate man.