NOAA caught fudging data AGAIN!!!

[bripat9643]

We are discussing data tampering by supposed scientists. You are the one trolling.

You stupid ass dumb ****, so you are saying that the scientists from every nation and culture on the planet are tampering with the data? Stocked up with lots of tinfoil for your little hats? God, you assholes are stupid.

They're all tools on the government payroll.

Good God! So what you are claiming is that every scientist in the world is on the US Government payroll? LOL You get dumber with every post.

All the climatologists are on the government payroll. Why would a private corporation hire a climatologist?

That has zero to do with anything.

Don't you climate con douchebags always tell us to follow the money?

 

[IanC]

To use your sporting analogy, Homewood is an interested spectator who is pointing out that Jordan had one foot out-of-bounds on the buzzer beating last shot.

No he isn't, and that is a stupid ******* analogy. He wouldnt have to point out something like that, because anybody with eyeballs can see it for themselves.

No, he is an uneducated slob who knows less than nothing about any of that, and he counts on goobers like you with similar knowledge to buy the snake oil he is selling. Period.

Why do you think it is a stupid analogy? Every parent who has had kids in sports has witnessed bad calls by the refs. Instant replay and reversal of mistakes doesn't happen.

The gatekeepers of temperature datasets are getting even more chary of divulging intermediate steps and calculations in their work, not less. There is no instant replay, no reversal of bad calls. No explanation is forthcoming for obvious mistakes. Often the childishly simply mistakes that are pointed out don't even get fixed. They are simply handwaved away as inconsequential.

You besmirch Homewood as a know nothing slob because you would rather insult and dismiss him than acknowledge that he has used his bookkeeping skills to point out an irregularity in the NOAA books. The data is there for everyone to look at, he has given links to the source material. We have been told that the adjustments should be about 1F yet they are 3F. Why don't you point out some of the districts that are adjusted by much less than 1F, to balance out the average?

I have actually looked up many of the papers that described the methodology for determining amount of adjustment used for the transition from one instrument to another, time of observation, etc. They are crude and seemingly unsuitable for a general number across all conditions.

For example, a German meteorologist kept both technologies running in parellel for over a decade, on his own initiative to satisfy his curiosity. When he retired, he released his data. The adjustment added for the switch to a different measurement instrument comprised almost ALL of the supposed warming trend. This was only one station in Germany but it mirrored the result for the whole country.

I could go on and on, and I have in the past. No one cares.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The North Korean leadership interviewed itself today. It has been revealed that Kim Jong-Il is actually a god!

 

[skookerasbil]

God we've had troll assholes around here before but this bozo ^^ needs a beer and a plan and a few real responsibilities in life.