NO PERSON SHALL...be deprived of liberty, without due process of LAW

Contumacious

Radical Freedom
Aug 16, 2009
20,173
2,847
280
Adjuntas, PR , USA
Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791.

No person shall
be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

So the fucktards who claim that the "islamofascists" have no right to be tried in US Courts should read the Fifth Amendment until they fucking memorize the same.

The Amendment says NO PERSON , it doesn't say NO US CITIZEN....

.
 
" Plus, we’ve waterboarded the heck out of Mohammed – 183 times, by the government’s own count –, so he’s likely to spew whatever the Feds tell him to: Prof. Shane O’Mara of Trinity College, Dublin, noted earlier this year that "brain imaging in people previously subjected to severe torture suggests that abnormal patterns of activation are present in the frontal and temporal lobes, leading to deficits in verbal memory for the recall of traumatic events.Luckily for Leviathan, "confabulation (the pathological production of false memories) is a common consequence of frontal lobe disorders." Wanna bet Mohammed has forgotten whatever role the Feds played on 9/11 while "remembering" that he alone masterminded the whole thing?

.
 
Once again retard the SUPREME COURT approved the use of Military tribunals for them, what part of that are you incapable of understanding?

Son-of-a-bitch.

Did they waterboard you too?!?!?!

.:rolleyes:

Answer the question dumb ass? Do you understand that the terrorists at Gitmo can be tried by military tribunals and that in fact the Current administration plans just that for some of them?
 
Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791.

No person shall
be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

So the fucktards who claim that the "islamofascists" have no right to be tried in US Courts should read the Fifth Amendment until they fucking memorize the same.

The Amendment says NO PERSON , it doesn't say NO US CITIZEN....

.

The Constitution was written for and applies to, American citizens. The V Amendment does not apply to terrorist, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, and any other illegal entity.
 
First Mr Obama decided to stop the Supreme Court approved , Military Tribunals which had already begun.

Then the administration picked out the worst of the group to have their dog & pony show in NYC.

And precedence has been set for the Military tribunals time and time again.

I wonder how many millions of Dollars were wasted because of this little show?
 
Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791.

No person shall
be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

So the fucktards who claim that the "islamofascists" have no right to be tried in US Courts should read the Fifth Amendment until they fucking memorize the same.

The Amendment says NO PERSON , it doesn't say NO US CITIZEN....

.

The Constitution was written for and applies to, American citizens. The V Amendment does not apply to terrorist, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, and any other illegal entity.

thats not true...illegal aliens....and it depends on terrorists, where they are caught and what circumstances etc....
 
Well again,, let's take fact and hit you idiots right squarely between your crossed little eyeballs.


holder bolder said "Even if they are acquitted they will not be set free." and that's the kind of justice you libtards will sell your souls for. Spit hark Spit.
 
Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791.

No person shall
be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

So the fucktards who claim that the "islamofascists" have no right to be tried in US Courts should read the Fifth Amendment until they fucking memorize the same.

The Amendment says NO PERSON , it doesn't say NO US CITIZEN....

.

The Constitution was written for and applies to, American citizens. The V Amendment does not apply to terrorist, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, and any other illegal entity.

thats not true...illegal aliens....and it depends on terrorists, where they are caught and what circumstances etc....

due process for spies is questioning, a last meal, a blindfold, and a smoke....before they are shot at dawn.....
 
The Constitution was written for and applies to, American citizens. The V Amendment does not apply to terrorist, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, and any other illegal entity.

thats not true...illegal aliens....and it depends on terrorists, where they are caught and what circumstances etc....

due process for spies is questioning, a last meal, a blindfold, and a smoke....before they are shot at dawn.....

damn...i have to beg to get a smoke....after....i've been blindfolded and stuff
 
Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791.

No person shall
be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

So the fucktards who claim that the "islamofascists" have no right to be tried in US Courts should read the Fifth Amendment until they fucking memorize the same.

The Amendment says NO PERSON , it doesn't say NO US CITIZEN....

.

The Constitution was written for and applies to, American citizens. The V Amendment does not apply to terrorist, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, and any other illegal entity.

thats not true...illegal aliens....and it depends on terrorists, where they are caught and what circumstances etc....

What I said is true. The Constitution was written for American citizens. It was not written for terrorists, prisoners of war, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, or any other non-American citizen group. Even though the courts may, at times, apply the Constitution to the aforementioned groups, that does not change the fact of what I said.
 
The Constitution was written for and applies to, American citizens. The V Amendment does not apply to terrorist, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, and any other illegal entity.

thats not true...illegal aliens....and it depends on terrorists, where they are caught and what circumstances etc....

What I said is true. The Constitution was written for American citizens. It was not written for terrorists, prisoners of war, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, or any other non-American citizen group. Even though the courts may, at times, apply the Constitution to the aforementioned groups, that does not change the fact of what I said.

so the courts are wrong and you are right....

what is your evidence for this? what precedent? what clause in the constitution supports your view?

what you're advocating is that anyone who is in the country, even visiting legally, does not have constitutional rights.....way wrong dude
 
thats not true...illegal aliens....and it depends on terrorists, where they are caught and what circumstances etc....

What I said is true. The Constitution was written for American citizens. It was not written for terrorists, prisoners of war, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, or any other non-American citizen group. Even though the courts may, at times, apply the Constitution to the aforementioned groups, that does not change the fact of what I said.

so the courts are wrong and you are right....

what is your evidence for this? what precedent? what clause in the constitution supports your view?

what you're advocating is that anyone who is in the country, even visiting legally, does not have constitutional rights.....way wrong dude

Actually Yurt he did answer everything you posted here - see red.
 
What I said is true. The Constitution was written for American citizens. It was not written for terrorists, prisoners of war, enemy combatants, illegal aliens, or any other non-American citizen group. Even though the courts may, at times, apply the Constitution to the aforementioned groups, that does not change the fact of what I said.

so the courts are wrong and you are right....

what is your evidence for this? what precedent? what clause in the constitution supports your view?

what you're advocating is that anyone who is in the country, even visiting legally, does not have constitutional rights.....way wrong dude

Actually Yurt he did answer everything you posted here - see red.

no....he actually said the courts may, at times, apply the constitution as i said it is applied.....he hasn't offered anything to support his view
 
thats not true...illegal aliens....and it depends on terrorists, where they are caught and what circumstances etc....

due process for spies is questioning, a last meal, a blindfold, and a smoke....before they are shot at dawn.....

damn...i have to beg to get a smoke....after....i've been blindfolded and stuff

they are bacon flavoured........
 

Forum List

Back
Top