No, Paedophiles Are Not Homosexual

[GHook93]

I feel sorry for the children of liberal parents who allow their kids to be around homos because it's the PC thing to do.

I feel I am more conservative than liberal. I bring my kids around my gay aunt, not because she is gay, but because she is a great person. I trust her not harming my kids than most other people.

And then when the young child is molested by a ****** they stupidly trusted to be alone with their young boy..

Evil people harm kids. Whether they are straight or gay, there is always one constant, the pedophile is evil. You should always be well aware of who you let around your kids with. I am glad I have been able to make enough money where my wife can stay home with my kids. An evil person can do horrendous things and not be a pedophile. You see the videos of babysitters and nannies beating the shit out of kids and even killing them. You see evil people kidnap kids and torture and murder them.

The parents can't seem to figure out what went wrong? .....

Usually a person who molests someone's child is someone the parents know and trust. Most of the time it's not an openly gay person. Many times it's careless parents.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, Paedophiles Are Not Homosexual

A homosexual pedophile IS a homosexual.

As is a heterosexual pedophile IS a heterosexual.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

No, Paedophiles Are Not Homosexual

A homosexual pedophile IS a homosexual.

As is a heterosexual pedophile IS a heterosexual.

Which raises an interesting question: Now that pedophilia is considered a sexual orientation, can people be two orientations concurrently? Like homosexual and pedophile, or heterosexual and pedophile? And what happens if people arrested for pedophile-related crimes claim to be pedophile and as such are entitled to legal recognition and protections like homosexuals arrested for homosexual acts before that was legalized?

 

[Howey]

Which raises an interesting question: Now that pedophilia is considered a sexual orientation,

Actually, it isn't. That was an error and has been corrected.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Which raises an interesting question: Now that pedophilia is considered a sexual orientation,

Actually, it isn't. That was an error and has been corrected.

Actually it wasn't an error so much as widely unpopular and pressure forced them to change it.

What is or isn't in the DSM is a matter of popular voting. Studies get conducted, people review it, then vote on whether to incorporate the data into DSM. In this case, there were studies showing pedo/hebe/ebopophelia (or whatever) resembled sexual orientations.

Numerous groups from across the spectrum went absolutely ballistic. And justifiably so. So the APA ammended the reclassification.

Wasn't a typo sorta error, just incredibly unwise in the first place.

 

[GHook93]

No, Paedophiles Are Not Homosexual

A homosexual pedophile IS a homosexual.

As is a heterosexual pedophile IS a heterosexual.

And the reverse is also true as DriftingSand stated. I don't think it makes a difference. Is a pedophile somehow less evil if he only rapes little girls and not little boys. In my views, all pedophiles are scum of the earth!

 

[Delta4Embassy]

A homosexual pedophile IS a homosexual.

As is a heterosexual pedophile IS a heterosexual.

And the reverse is also true as DriftingSand stated. I don't think it makes a difference. Is a pedophile somehow less evil if he only rapes little girls and not little boys. In my views, all pedophiles are scum of the earth!

Pedophiles who break the law should be punished. But in trying to combat that problem I'd like to try and figure out those who do offend. A non-offending pedophile is no more objectionable than a heterosexual who never offends. That's my thing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

As is a heterosexual pedophile IS a heterosexual.

And the reverse is also true as DriftingSand stated. I don't think it makes a difference. Is a pedophile somehow less evil if he only rapes little girls and not little boys. In my views, all pedophiles are scum of the earth!

Pedophiles who break the law should be punished. But in trying to combat that problem I'd like to try and figure out those who do offend. A non-offending pedophile is no more objectionable than a heterosexual who never offends. That's my thing.

You want to study criminals. Understandable.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

And the reverse is also true as DriftingSand stated. I don't think it makes a difference. Is a pedophile somehow less evil if he only rapes little girls and not little boys. In my views, all pedophiles are scum of the earth!

Pedophiles who break the law should be punished. But in trying to combat that problem I'd like to try and figure out those who do offend. A non-offending pedophile is no more objectionable than a heterosexual who never offends. That's my thing.

You want to study criminals. Understandable.

Reasons for crime more so than the criminals themselves.

After WWII and the Holocaust a lot of study began into how that sort of thign happens. Ironically, much of it by the Germans themselves. And I think that sort of research is valuable as it may have applicaitons into every other facet of criminality. If we come up with criteria or risk factors where we associate this, that, and that other thing with becomming criminals, maybe we can nip things inthe bud before they go too far.

I'd rather work on preventing criminality in the first place, than handling it after the fact like.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

The level of ignorance in this thread by the homophobes is staggering....

Alinsky would be proud of you. If you don't like the subject, "kill the messenger".

If you are here to debate, lets do so. If all you have left is name calling, I can ascertain that you have no facts to back you up.

Which is it?

Mark

Calling a homophobes a homophobes isn't name calling. It's telling the truth.

In order to justify your fear of homosexuality, you had to search google for an inane, debunked theory commissioned by a hate group to allay your fears.

Calling everyone who challenges your premise a homophobe, or accusing them of being homosexual, is name calling.

By the way, the fact that SPLC labels someone a hate group does not, in and of itself, make them a hate group.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Alinsky would be proud of you. If you don't like the subject, "kill the messenger".

If you are here to debate, lets do so. If all you have left is name calling, I can ascertain that you have no facts to back you up.

Which is it?

Mark

Calling a homophobes a homophobes isn't name calling. It's telling the truth.

In order to justify your fear of homosexuality, you had to search google for an inane, debunked theory commissioned by a hate group to allay your fears.

Calling everyone who challenges your premise a homophobe, or accusing them of being homosexual, is name calling.

By the way, the fact that SPLC labels someone a hate group does not, in and of itself, make them a hate group.

QWB, by his words and his name calling here, is a homophobe.

 

[Howey]

Calling a homophobes a homophobes isn't name calling. It's telling the truth.

In order to justify your fear of homosexuality, you had to search google for an inane, debunked theory commissioned by a hate group to allay your fears.

Calling everyone who challenges your premise a homophobe, or accusing them of being homosexual, is name calling.

By the way, the fact that SPLC labels someone a hate group does not, in and of itself, make them a hate group.

QWB, by his words and his name calling here, is a homophobe.

Correct.

 

[Sunni Man]

Fudge packers and pedophiles are just two sides of the same pervert coin. ....

 

[Howey]

Fudge packers and pedophiles are just two sides of the same pervert coin. ....

Can't name names?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Calling a homophobes a homophobes isn't name calling. It's telling the truth.

In order to justify your fear of homosexuality, you had to search google for an inane, debunked theory commissioned by a hate group to allay your fears.

Calling everyone who challenges your premise a homophobe, or accusing them of being homosexual, is name calling.

By the way, the fact that SPLC labels someone a hate group does not, in and of itself, make them a hate group.

QWB, by his words and his name calling here, is a homophobe.

Jake, by his words and actions, is an idiot.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Calling everyone who challenges your premise a homophobe, or accusing them of being homosexual, is name calling.

By the way, the fact that SPLC labels someone a hate group does not, in and of itself, make them a hate group.

QWB, by his words and his name calling here, is a homophobe.

Correct.

Funny how, out of the tow of us, you are the one that uses sexual preference as an insult, isn't it?

 

[Noomi]

I'm sure this will help all the little boys raped by homosexuals feel better

I knew there would be at one person who chose to remain ignorant.

 

[Sunni Man]

Fudge packers and pedophiles are just two sides of the same pervert coin. ....

Can't name names?

That would be against the rules.

But the guilty know who they are........

 

[JakeStarkey]

It's against the rules if you infer ALL gays are pedophiles, because that means you are calling every gay on the board a pedophile.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

It's against the rules if you infer ALL gays are pedophiles, because that means you are calling every gay on the board a pedophile.

Sounds like the six degrees of separation game.