No, Gal Gidot did not get less money for Wonder Woman because she was a woman...

[2aguy]

Yeah....a new star, in a risky new Superhero movie was paid 300,000 dollars......and the feminists are going crazy...

The problem....Thor was paid less.....

No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'

In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.

But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).

Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Yeah....a new star, in a risky new Superhero movie was paid 300,000 dollars......and the feminists are going crazy...

The problem....Thor was paid less.....

No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'

In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.

But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).

Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."

Did she get a percentage of the marketing royalties such a Wonder Woman toys and dolls modeled in her image, etc? That's where she'll make millions.

 

[Auld Phart]

Yeah....a new star, in a risky new Superhero movie was paid 300,000 dollars......and the feminists are going crazy...

The problem....Thor was paid less.....

No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'

In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.

But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).

Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."

Did she get a percentage of the marketing royalties such a Wonder Woman toys and dolls modeled in her image, etc? That's where she'll make millions.

not likely.

DC and the studio own those rights

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Yeah....a new star, in a risky new Superhero movie was paid 300,000 dollars......and the feminists are going crazy...

The problem....Thor was paid less.....

No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'

In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.

But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).

Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."

Did she get a percentage of the marketing royalties such a Wonder Woman toys and dolls modeled in her image, etc? That's where she'll make millions.

not likely.

DC and the studio own those rights

Yeah....a new star, in a risky new Superhero movie was paid 300,000 dollars......and the feminists are going crazy...

The problem....Thor was paid less.....

No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'

In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.

But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).

Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."

Did she get a percentage of the marketing royalties such a Wonder Woman toys and dolls modeled in her image, etc? That's where she'll make millions.

not likely.

DC and the studio own those rights

I rcould be wrong but I seem to remember the actor that played Spock on the original Star Trek sued the studio back in the 70's because they were using his image to sell Star Trek products and he won millions and the rights to future royalties. Can't think of his name off hand. Nevertheless, a lot of actors after that lawsuit started negotiating for a part of the royalties from films as part of their payment to star in them.

 

[miketx]

Bitch ought to be home cleaning and cooking....

 

[Auld Phart]

Yeah....a new star, in a risky new Superhero movie was paid 300,000 dollars......and the feminists are going crazy...

The problem....Thor was paid less.....

No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'

In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.

But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).

Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."

Did she get a percentage of the marketing royalties such a Wonder Woman toys and dolls modeled in her image, etc? That's where she'll make millions.

not likely.

DC and the studio own those rights

Yeah....a new star, in a risky new Superhero movie was paid 300,000 dollars......and the feminists are going crazy...

The problem....Thor was paid less.....

No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'

In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.

But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).

Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."

Did she get a percentage of the marketing royalties such a Wonder Woman toys and dolls modeled in her image, etc? That's where she'll make millions.

not likely.

DC and the studio own those rights

I rcould be wrong but I seem to remember the actor that played Spock on the original Star Trek sued the studio back in the 70's because they were using his image to sell Star Trek products and he won millions and the rights to future royalties. Can't think of his name off hand. Nevertheless, a lot of actors after that lawsuit started negotiating for a part of the royalties from films as part of their payment to star in them.

Leonard Nimoy

and Wonder Woman was around long before Gal Gadot

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Bitch ought to be home cleaning and cooking....

That "bitch" is a former IDF Soldier and knows Krav Maga.

 

[miketx]

Bitch ought to be home cleaning and cooking....

That "bitch" is a former IDF Soldier and knows Krav Maga.

I met him once, so what?