2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,973
- 52,245
- 2,290
Yeah....a new star, in a risky new Superhero movie was paid 300,000 dollars......and the feminists are going crazy...
The problem....Thor was paid less.....
No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'
In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.
But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).
Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."
The problem....Thor was paid less.....
No, Feminists, Gal Gadot's Paycheck Does NOT Prove The 'Gender Wage Gap'
In fact, when Chris Hemsworth starred as Thor, he was reportedly paid a base salary of $200,000, and Chris Evans playing Captain America in Captain America: The First Avenger was paid a reported $300,000.
But what about the $14 million to Henry Cavill for Man of Steel? That was actually Carvill's pay including the added cash from the high box office performance and bonuses, unlike Gadot's sourced $300k, which is base pay for each film (there will surely be sequels to Wonder Woman).
Furthermore, as a source told Vanity Fair, Cavill's $14 mill was likely a total from more than one film. “It certainly isn’t for one picture. That’s insane," said the source. “Entry level actors in franchise films are paid an initial rate. As a franchise takes off, they stand to make more money."