No food stamps for any family of a striking worker

Well I'm a restaurant manager so I don't see union in my future
:cool:

:salute:
:D

Can you give us some information about your restaurant?
It's a really large corporation with several concepts.
Are nifty little "electronic communication agreement" prevents me from divulging more than that. ;)
We were recently voted into the top 100 companies to work for,,,,,,first time a restaurant company has made it that high.
Almost 200,000 employees.
:eusa_whistle:
 
It is an example of how people working together collectively be more successful in a capitalistic system. Of course many Republicans would love to get rid of unions because they are pro-business not pro free market.

So the guy making $10 an hour and is paying for the food stamps of a guy who quit a job paying $15 an hour is now called "working together".

There you have it folks. They screw you and then they insult you. Not even a thank you kiss.

Someone making $10 an hour isn't likely to be paying any federal income taxes.

So now you want me to believe that only those making more than $15 an hour will be paying for his family's food. Is that what you're saying?
 
It's certainly not anti-union bias. All the policy makers at DHS are represented by the union.

It's more like policy that was already in place. One of the questions on the fs application is "are you striking". I've never had anyone who was, so I'm not familiar with the policy that comes into play for strikers; I presume based on what I am hearing (including something that came from my supervisor at a staff meeting a few days ago) that strikers are ineligible if they apply w/in 30 days of leaving their productive job....that's 100 hours a month. I think PROBABLY it's just the striker who is ineligible.

Now most strikers will have received income in the month in which they are ineligible for fs; they will have their paychecks for the month and we count that in the month they apply in anyway; so nobody is likely starving. After 30 days from the date their strike commenced, I am going to hazard a guess that they are eligible, at least in that way, just as anyone else is eligible after a certain time elapses.

I will look up the policy on this. It could be more complicated; there could be special sanctions for strikers; but if there are, I've never heard of them or seen them applied before.
 
We are the wealthiest nation on earth. We are not Calcutta

We can afford to provide food for all Americans whether you think they deserve it or not

What happens when 99 poercent of the people decide they want to get food stamps and quit their jobs who will be paying for them?
The same thing that happens when Nibiru returns, Bush declares marshal law, and Terral is appointed head of FEMA
 
So the guy making $10 an hour and is paying for the food stamps of a guy who quit a job paying $15 an hour is now called "working together".

There you have it folks. They screw you and then they insult you. Not even a thank you kiss.

Someone making $10 an hour isn't likely to be paying any federal income taxes.

So now you want me to believe that only those making more than $15 an hour will be paying for his family's food. Is that what you're saying?

Believe what you want but food stamps are paid for by taxes and taxes are determined by the tax table after deductions and credits.
 
Someone making $10 an hour isn't likely to be paying any federal income taxes.

So now you want me to believe that only those making more than $15 an hour will be paying for his family's food. Is that what you're saying?

Believe what you want but food stamps are paid for by taxes and taxes are determined by the tax table after deductions and credits.

I'll believe the truth. How can you justify a person making $15 an hour, not counting their benefits, quitting their job and using government funding by their fellow American taxpaers to feed their family?
 
if you refuse to work and fulfill your societal and moral obligations of feeding your family then you don't deserve to have your food paid for by those who are not shirking their responsibilities.

Have some ******* pride and integrity and pay your own damn bills.
 
What if you can't because idiots like you refuse to let people work and earn honest income?

So you're saying tha ift a person stays in a job even though that job doesn't pay him enough to feed his family that it's OK for him not to work and expect people who do work to feed his family?

If you can't pay your bills working one job then you have 2 choices. Reduce your expenses or get another job.

You don't get to mooch off of others who work just because you think you're entitled.
 
What if you can't because idiots like you refuse to let people work and earn honest income?

Idiots like who? Who is refusing to let people work and earn an honest income?

People who strike are refusing to earn money that is available but they think that the rest of us should feed them while they sit on their collective asses.
 
What if you can't because idiots like you refuse to let people work and earn honest income?

Idiots like who? Who is refusing to let people work and earn an honest income?
Skull has said before he refuses to give people a chance to work an honest job if they shot someone who broke in their house in a state that doesn't have Castle Doctrine laws in place. He wants them to rob him or let their children starve instead.
 
Last edited:
What if you can't because idiots like you refuse to let people work and earn honest income?

Idiots like who? Who is refusing to let people work and earn an honest income?
Skull has said before he refuses to give people a chance to work an honest job if they shot someone who broke in their house in a state that have Castle Doctrine laws in place. He wants them to rob him or let their children starve instead.

Got it. Thanks.
 
What if you can't because idiots like you refuse to let people work and earn honest income?

Idiots like who? Who is refusing to let people work and earn an honest income?
Skull has said before he refuses to give people a chance to work an honest job if they shot someone who broke in their house in a state that doesn't have Castle Doctrine laws in place. He wants them to rob him or let their children starve instead.

If he really said that, I don't see the need for you to paraphrase..you can provide a quote, surely.
 
15th post
Ask him yourself.

Skull, do you hire felons?

It is a felony, after all, to shoot someone who breaks into your house if the State decides your life wasn't in danger and you don't live in a Castle Doctrine state.
 
Naw, I don't need to. I'll just assume you're making shit up, since I see nothing to convince me otherwise.
 
Someone tries to steal your car and you taze him? He has a heart condition and dies? Easy to get hit with manslaughter. Truck attorney cause you can't afford a six-digit lawyer? Bam, you're a felon.

Skull doesn't think you should ever be allowed to earn an honest paycheck
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom