Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not one of the arrested people in the capitol building had a firearm.
2 people were arrested for firearms violations but neither were in the building. How was this an armed rebellion?
If this incident had actually been an armed insurrection the rioters would have taken over the Capitol Building and might still be holding it today.
The media is trying to portray it as an armed insurrection to help promote draconian gun control by the Biden administration. That’s also why we keep hearing about white supremacists in the police forces and the army. The liberal media is pushing propaganda that armed white males are everywhere and are far more dangerous than Antifa or Black Lives Matter.
Oddly armed angry white males (the scourge of the world) haven’t looted or burned any cities lately. Nor have they assassinated any cops who were just sitting in their patrol cars. But you best be very afraid of the terrible white male. To our media and Democrat politicians he is the ultimate villain worse even than the mythical werewolf, vampire or shapeshifter.
I don't know what the hell you were watching, but a "cover-up" it was not. ThisThis will go down in history as one of the biggest cover-ups of recent years. The fact that Pelosi is suggesting a "9-11-style investigation" is the proof. She wants a total whitewash and rebranding of what was nothing more than a bit of adventurism by a couple dozen crazies, coupled with an over-enthusiastic political rally (with a valid grievance).
Over one month later, there is still no official statement from the DC Medical Examiner on the cause of Officer Sicknick's death. What possible explanation could justify this breach of mandatory candor by a public operative?
Almost no one was arrested on site. How do we know they weren't carrying on the day?Not one of the arrested people in the capitol building had a firearm.
2 people were arrested for firearms violations but neither were in the building. How was this an armed rebellion?
An unarmed insurrection in which almost no one was injured and very little property damaged...and the insurrectionists all left of their own accord after taking possession of the capital. If that’s an insurrection, the word needs to be re-defined.I don't know what the hell you were watching, but a "cover-up" it was not. ThisThis will go down in history as one of the biggest cover-ups of recent years. The fact that Pelosi is suggesting a "9-11-style investigation" is the proof. She wants a total whitewash and rebranding of what was nothing more than a bit of adventurism by a couple dozen crazies, coupled with an over-enthusiastic political rally (with a valid grievance).
Over one month later, there is still no official statement from the DC Medical Examiner on the cause of Officer Sicknick's death. What possible explanation could justify this breach of mandatory candor by a public operative?
was an insurrection whether you choose to believe it or not. Anything to "cover-up"
Trump's part in the assault, yes?
They had t-shirts made.If this had been a planned armed insurrection
Not one of the arrested people in the capitol building had a firearm.
2 people were arrested for firearms violations but neither were in the building. How was this an armed rebellion?
You are wrong in what you say, and it is irrelevant because this was indeed an insurrection, guns or no guns."Pro-love" is being anti-racist.You seem to believe everyone is a white supremacist. That is the Woke Cult mentality where they believe everyone is racist who isn't a part of their cult. When the ones that are a part of the cult that say they are anti-racist, are the most racist people there is. How about instead of being anti-racist, try being pro-love.
Which normal person wouldn't want to be anti-racist?
There is a reason behind using the term anti instead of pro. Have you not ever read the book 1984? Anti Racist is exactly the opposite or what it is saying. The Anti Racist are actually creating more racism and hate. That is the point behind them to divide and conquer.
Beg your pardon - but that's a frustrated stupidness: You say racism is inevitable, because as well racists and anti-racists are racists.
Let me ask you this. If the Woke Cult who says they are Anti-Racist, why are they a part of trying to teach people to be less white? That in itself is racist.
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Tolerance needs intolerance against intolerance for example. Perhaps this helps you in your strange forms to think, which I do not understand.
To make it easier to understand, they will do the opposite of what they say they are doing with these terms. It is called doublethink.
Doublethink is a process of indoctrination whereby the subject is expected to simultaneously accept two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct.
Only because you take serios some nonsense makes this the nonense which you say not more un-nonsensic (=senseful). Sure is for example an atheist able to say "I believe in god" and a believer in god is able to say "I don't believe in god" - but what says this about the concrete reasons of an heart to do so ? And you are your own "doublethinker" if you say racists are anti-rtacsoisat or anti-racists are racists, because the laws of logic allow everyone to say every nonsense out of such a self-contrary predication. Self-contrary predications are the main reason why people, who are wrong, are not able to find out that it is wrong what they say.
View attachment 460729They had t-shirts made.If this had been a planned armed insurrection
Not one of the arrested people in the capitol building had a firearm.
2 people were arrested for firearms violations but neither were in the building. How was this an armed rebellion?
Further there is no real evidence that the attack was a white supremist attack either.
An armed insurrection against the seat of our government where many people were injured, 7 people died and much property damage occurred...and the insurrectionists left when Trump told them to leave. If that isn't an insurrection, I don't know what is.An unarmed insurrection in which almost no one was injured and very little property damaged...and the insurrectionists all left of their own accord after taking possession of the capital. If that’s an insurrection, the word needs to be re-defined.I don't know what the hell you were watching, but a "cover-up" it was not. ThisThis will go down in history as one of the biggest cover-ups of recent years. The fact that Pelosi is suggesting a "9-11-style investigation" is the proof. She wants a total whitewash and rebranding of what was nothing more than a bit of adventurism by a couple dozen crazies, coupled with an over-enthusiastic political rally (with a valid grievance).
Over one month later, there is still no official statement from the DC Medical Examiner on the cause of Officer Sicknick's death. What possible explanation could justify this breach of mandatory candor by a public operative?
was an insurrection whether you choose to believe it or not. Anything to "cover-up"
Trump's part in the assault, yes?
Don’t be a dupe for the establishment.
there is no evidence that trauma killed the officerNot one of the arrested people in the capitol building had a firearm.
2 people were arrested for firearms violations but neither were in the building. How was this an armed rebellion?
They clearly were armed with something. 140 officers didn't get hurt because the protestors huffed and puffed and blow their house down. Not to mention the 1 dead officer.
I can’t stand dumb Don dummy. I’m glad he’s gone, but now we have a senile old neocon in Slow Joe.An armed insurrection against the seat of our government where many people were injured, 7 people died and much property damage occurred...and the insurrectionists left when Trump told them to leave. If that isn't an insurrection, I don't know what is.An unarmed insurrection in which almost no one was injured and very little property damaged...and the insurrectionists all left of their own accord after taking possession of the capital. If that’s an insurrection, the word needs to be re-defined.I don't know what the hell you were watching, but a "cover-up" it was not. ThisThis will go down in history as one of the biggest cover-ups of recent years. The fact that Pelosi is suggesting a "9-11-style investigation" is the proof. She wants a total whitewash and rebranding of what was nothing more than a bit of adventurism by a couple dozen crazies, coupled with an over-enthusiastic political rally (with a valid grievance).
Over one month later, there is still no official statement from the DC Medical Examiner on the cause of Officer Sicknick's death. What possible explanation could justify this breach of mandatory candor by a public operative?
was an insurrection whether you choose to believe it or not. Anything to "cover-up"
Trump's part in the assault, yes?
Don’t be a dupe for the establishment.
Don't be a dupe for Trump.
there is no evidence that trauma killed the officerNot one of the arrested people in the capitol building had a firearm.
2 people were arrested for firearms violations but neither were in the building. How was this an armed rebellion?
They clearly were armed with something. 140 officers didn't get hurt because the protestors huffed and puffed and blow their house down. Not to mention the 1 dead officer.
This will go down in history as one of the biggest cover-ups of recent years. The fact that Pelosi is suggesting a "9-11-style investigation" is the proof. She wants a total whitewash and rebranding of what was nothing more than a bit of adventurism by a couple dozen crazies, coupled with an over-enthusiastic political rally (with a valid grievance).
Over one month later, there is still no official statement from the DC Medical Examiner on the cause of Officer Sicknick's death. What possible explanation could justify this breach of mandatory candor by a public operative?
An unarmed insurrection in which almost no one was injured and very little property damaged...and the insurrectionists all left of their own accord after taking possession of the capital. If that’s an insurrection, the word needs to be re-defined.I don't know what the hell you were watching, but a "cover-up" it was not. ThisThis will go down in history as one of the biggest cover-ups of recent years. The fact that Pelosi is suggesting a "9-11-style investigation" is the proof. She wants a total whitewash and rebranding of what was nothing more than a bit of adventurism by a couple dozen crazies, coupled with an over-enthusiastic political rally (with a valid grievance).
Over one month later, there is still no official statement from the DC Medical Examiner on the cause of Officer Sicknick's death. What possible explanation could justify this breach of mandatory candor by a public operative?
was an insurrection whether you choose to believe it or not. Anything to "cover-up"
Trump's part in the assault, yes?
Don’t be a dupe for the establishment.
The narrative is simply everyone who supported Trump is racist, supremacist, white, Walmart shopper, and uneducated moron. Especially if they attended one of the Donald’s campaign rally’s. Like 70+million supporters. Wow that’s a lot of re-education camps.
