No, Charlie Kirk Was Not Practicing Politics the Right Way

[Mac-7]

If you're referring to the 4 women Kirk named, one of whom is a former First Lady of the White House, the other is a current Supreme Court justice, their references to affirmative action refers to the "opportunity to compete". Once in however, they rose to the top due to their own hard work, abilities and natural intelligence/smarts. As congresswomen Jackson stated, affirmative action got her through the door, but affirmative action was not there to help her graduate--that was all her.

And all 4 are anti white race baiters

 

[Correll]

If you're referring to the 4 women Kirk named, one of whom is a former First Lady of the White House, the other is a current Supreme Court justice, their references to affirmative action refers to the "opportunity to compete". Once in however, they rose to the top due to their own hard work, abilities and natural intelligence/smarts. As congresswomen Jackson stated, affirmative action got her through the door, but affirmative action was not there to help her graduate--that was all her.

The mistake you all KEEP making, and it's a logical flaw in your reasoning, is that EVERYTHING that Black people obtain when it comes to education, employment, promotions, etc. comes at the expense of a white person and in your minds, it's ALWAYS a much more qualified white person who lost out.

If you took your beliefs and converted them into computer code, the code would prove every single time that your beliefs are incorrect as well as false.

That is not our complaint. That was never our complaint. You are purposefully not hearing what we actually say, so that you can talk shit.

 

[Correll]

Reported

Your inability to argue your position is noted.

 

[Doc7505]

All that is a hateful lie, but a fitting tribute to Kirk.

~~~~~~>
Charlie Kirk played a significant role in mobilizing young conservatives, including Blacks, to support the Republican Party and its ideologies, particularly through his organization Turning Point USA. His approach often involved challenging Marxist Socialist ideas and promoting conservative values, which resonated with certain demographics disillusioned with the Democratic Party.

 

[frigidweirdo]

..lying coxuckers. Charlie was a very good man.
In the daily battles between good and evil, to oppose Charlie is to prove you are evil.

If you watch what he did, if you see what he was doing, he was doing what the OP says.

That you didn't debate the OP, instead just say "fake news" or "liar" or "we're the good guys".... kind of shows that.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Here we have another attempt to justify murder only a progressive woke amoral democrat would make.
First blame the victim by calling him racist and bigoted. Have we heard this BS before.
The fact is most killers are woke progressives triggered by hate speech like this pathetic excuse to justify murder. This is who and what they are. As their movement dies they lash out violently, with hate speech and bold faced lies.
Tow woke trans killers shot children in religious schools, they tried to kill Trump 3 times, they killed Kirk, there have been 7 trans mass killers. So which side is the violence coming from. Your side

Nobody is justifying murder. Nobody is saying he should have been murdered.

HOWEVER the right is trying to use Kirk as some kind of martyr, he's not. He wasn't a good guy, he was manipulating people.

We're not blaming the victim.

The fact that you use the term "they". Who is "they"?

It's the same as "the deep state", you blame things on something anonymous, something you don't have to defend. Just use the word and hope that people infer something from that, but it's not easy to be attacked, therefore doesn't need to be defended.

So, who is "they"?

 

[frigidweirdo]

He has a good point the women he named arent very bright and were elevated because of their race. Thats not all black women. Thats DEI thats how we got Harris whom is as dumb as a rock. Claudine Gay the corrupt plagiarizer and many more

You think Harris is less smart than you? Really?

And the whole "blacks got where they got because of DEI" just reinforced racism. A lot of blacks got where they got because of who they are.

Plenty of white people got elevated above their abilities in US history too, slavery, segregation and just not giving black people jobs.

You only need take a look at a lot of the police forces around the country to see useless white trash getting police jobs they shouldn't have. Given through nepotism, through all kinds of means other than "who is best qualified for this government job?"

 

[teddyearp]

Charlie Kirk - "We should hire people according to merit not race"

DEMOCRATS - "See??? RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

There are some successful black people who brag about using affirmative action to get where they are on one hand, yet still claim they were oppressed on the other.

Well, isn't affirmative action a bit oppressive? As at it's core, it still tracks with the old eugenic racist belief that skin color can determine mental acuity.

 

[teddyearp]

Steal a white persons slot because you (as a black person) does not have the brain power.

I know, not racist.

Nope. Not racist. Your strawman argument fails. Your statement, 'Charlie Kirk hates [all] black women and thinks they do not have brain power' is false. He did not say all black women. He just called out a few, not all.

Justice Jackson is very much deserving of his criticism. She sits on the highest court of the land, but doesn't care for the constitution. She hands down opinions based on feelings, not law. Here, she says that the first amendment basically needs to go. Imagine that right now with all of what's going on in the backlash of Charlie Kirk's senseless murder.

SCOTUS Justice Jackson Needs Impeached

A Supreme court Justice seems to think so little of the Constitution that she wants to flat out ignore it and its intent. I had an article...

ted.servepics.com

 

[teddyearp]

<snip>You print comic book articles here and have never had an original thought yourself, just cut and paste. Pathetic.

Just wain until you run into one of the ones here who live to use AI to make their point. Hilarious, if it wasn't so sad as a statement of how lazy people's minds are getting.

 

[Correll]

There are some successful black people who brag about using affirmative action to get where they are on one hand, yet still claim they were oppressed on the other.

Well, isn't affirmative action a bit oppressive? As at it's core, it still tracks with the old eugenic racist belief that skin color can determine mental acuity.

Future generations will be simply not believe it, when their history teachers try to explain how, for decades our policy was to discriminate in favor of blacks, but not at the expense of whites.


Which is clearly impossible. Believing that takes is a form of madness.

 

[kyzr]

If you watch what he did, if you see what he was doing, he was doing what the OP says.
That you didn't debate the OP, instead just say "fake news" or "liar" or "we're the good guys".... kind of shows that.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Charlie was none of the awful things the OP said, nor proved. Typing lies is easy.
The beautiful memorial for Charlie disproves the lies the democrats threw at him.

 

[teddyearp]

What did he say that was racist? I’ll wait, but won’t hold my breath.

Oh, don't worry, they have already compiled a bunch of snippets of what he said to make their straw man case. It's amazing at what (Soros) money can buy, and with a quickness.

 

[teddyearp]

No idea what you are talking about. The democrats picked up a house seat in the last election and will likely win the midterms. Trump and MAGA are batting about .500 when it comes to wins.. which is because we are an evenly split nation on the parties. Your nonsensical babbling notwithstanding.

Just keep this up, you're doing just fine . . .

 

[teddyearp]

No, he specifically said Jim Crow.

Wow, now you really are showing your contempt for honest debate. The poster you are replying to and quoted, DID say that. You just omitted that from the quote you used. Kind of like what legacy media does to any body's quotes they don't like. Cherry pick it and claim that 'this is what he meant'. Typical strawman.

 

[teddyearp]

NYPD’s Infamous Stop-and-Frisk Policy Found Unconstitutional

By Taahira Thompson, a Summer 2013 Leadership Conference Intern In a decision announced last week, a federal judge found the New York City Police Department’s “Stop-and-Frisk” policy unconstitutional. The controversial policy allowed police officers to stop, interrogate and search New York City...

civilrights.org

You lie. Again. Show us in the text of that law where it specified that black people are to be singled out. I know what the statistics say about how it was used, but show us in the text of the law the proof of your statement.

 

[teddyearp]

Sure, and even a few more when you hire based on race not merit. Race is prioritized over merit. How do you not understand how that would allow for some lesser qualified people?

I am seeing someone (who you are replying to) that is not interested in debating honesty, just someone who deflects, and mainly uses straw man arguments.

Therefore understanding is beyond its apparent capability.

 

[westwall]

Play the entire video, not the heavily edited shit here.

You know why you don't dare do that, because the whole video PROVES you assholes are lying.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Play the entire video, not the heavily edited shit here.

You know why you don't dare do that, because the whole video PROVES you assholes are lying.

It's how the assholes roll

 

[Papageorgio]

Why is the left so obsessed with spinning Kirk and what he stood for? I can’t understand why they need to lie and double and triple down on the lies. Seems Kirk has been more powerful message after his death and the left can’t handle the truth.