sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,632
- 280
Because the guys on the ground just wanted to make money...even though they came out and said this pretty soon after the attack. That’s apparently a more believable motivation for lying, over Brennan, who is Obama’s appointee and guy, covering for the administration at bare minimum extreme negligence at the height of a presidential campaign. A lot more motivation there.dude, not only that, he disses the guy that was there. Acts like he knows more then Tiegen on what happened, cause someone said. That's dangerous. I trust first hand knowledge over bullshit everyday. If Tiegen says there was a stand down order, there was a stand down order, he got it. What does he gain by saying so?Correction: You BELIEVE that the claim a stand-down order was given is hogwash because you have chosen to believe those who claim there was not.All I know that Tiegen's claim that the CIA Chief of Base issued a stand down order is hog wash.
As I pointed out, CIA Director Brennan sat in front of Congress and declared with great conviction that neither he nor his CIA had illegally and Un-Constitutionally spied on the US Senate...and approx. a week later he was called before Congress and shown the evidence that he had intentionally committed Perjury earlier during his testimony. I KNOW Brennan was forced to go before Congress after that to ADMIT that he HAD indeed illegally and Un-Constitutionally spied on the Senate in order to avoid indictment and crime.
The CIA is an agency infested with professional liars and criminals who spend most of their existence violating the Constitution and laws. The CIA was in Benghazi, for example, illegally running weapons to terrorists. So these 'very good men' - these such 'trustworthy, honest men' - are telling the truth about not giving a stand-down order while they were in Benghazi illegally arming terrorists?! And you are SURE of that....
REALLY?!
The obvious next question is if there was no stand down order, why didn't they go?
It's not logical.
And that is a good question. Why was it determined that it was too dangerous for a carrier group to send air support within 20 minutes...but not too dangerous for a handful of CIA guys to come all the way from Tripoli to help out?