No Benghazi Stand Down Order

Slice The Great

VIP Member
Oct 28, 2015
301
21
66
I'll wager you $5,000,000, or a lower amount, if you don't have that much, that you can't prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the CIA Chief of Base in Benghazi ordered the CIA rescue team not to go assist the diplomatic mission that was under attack.
Liars of Benghazi all three.jpg
 
how many Republican lead investigations into 'Benghazi' have there been already; six, seven, eight?

I f***ing lost count.

How many indictments so far? ZERO

F***ing next, please.
 
There are only two possible reasons for the lack of response during the 13 hour Benghazi attack. The most likely reason is a stand down order given how close in proximity CIA forces were. The other possibility is that the CIA personnel were too scared to get their asses over their and fight. Your 5 million dollar bet is a joke because you know it is impossible to prove or disprove a verbal order.
 
There are only two possible reasons for the lack of response during the 13 hour Benghazi attack. The most likely reason is a stand down order given how close in proximity CIA forces were. The other possibility is that the CIA personnel were too scared to get their asses over their and fight. Your 5 million dollar bet is a joke because you know it is impossible to prove or disprove a verbal order.
There was a massive response the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi.

Feb 17 arrived at the diplomatic mission minutes after the the attack started.

The CIA Annex sent a six man rescue team to the diplomatic mission.

The CIA in Tripoli sent a seven man team to Benghazi.

The Libyan Shield sent 50 machine gun trucks to the CIA annex.

The Libyan Air Force sent a C-130 to transport the Americans from Benghazi to Tripoli.

The U. S. Air Force sent a C-17 to transport the Americans from Tripoli to Germany.

Obama sent two special forces units, a Marine Fast Platoon and naval assets.
 
I'll wager you $5,000,000, or a lower amount, if you don't have that much, that you can't prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the CIA Chief of Base in Benghazi ordered the CIA rescue team not to go assist the diplomatic mission that was under attack.View attachment 215349
Brennan was caught twice Perjuring himself before Congress, caught illegally spying on US citizens, caught illegally spying on the media, caught illegally spying on the US Senate, and spying on USSC Justices.

Brennan was caught illegally running good to terrorists...

Brennan collaborated with the FBI to hide Russian crimes associated with the KGB Bank's efforts to acquire Uranium One until after the sale went through...

Brennan's and the CIA knew about Russian hacking and interference but the Obama administration did nothing about it...

Brennan was caught briefing a fake Russian-authored report to Congress as legitimate Intel in order to deceive Congress to appoint a Special Counsel as part of a conspiracy to overthrow the newly elected President.

And you claim the heroes of Benghazi - who fought the very terrorists Barry helped take over Libya, who were trying to kill the US Ambassador and other Americans - liars?!

Obama, himself, and Hillary both lied about the attack, calling it a 'Protest over a Video' ... much like he once called the Fort Hood Terrorist attack a 'Case of Workplace Violence'.

Obama, Hillary, Brennan...they all have been proven to have lied about the Benghazi attack ... but snowflakes call the heroes of Benghazi the liars.

Obama disappeared when the attack began. No one knows where he was.... Everyone knows where Paronto was - he was fighting to save Americans that never should have been in harm's way on 9/11/12.
 
how many Republican lead investigations into 'Benghazi' have there been already; six, seven, eight?

I f***ing lost count.

How many indictments so far? ZERO

F***ing next, please.


The public doesn't give a shit about that we want team Obama to admit it wasn't over a dumb ass video as they claimed and tried to bury it a few months before an election.
 
There hasn't been any prosecutions for benghazi because republicans are so dumb and helpless that with a republican house, senate, and presidency they are lost. Republicans are the biggest morons ever, who the fuck votes for these idiots?
 
I'll wager you $5,000,000, or a lower amount, if you don't have that much, that you can't prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the CIA Chief of Base in Benghazi ordered the CIA rescue team not to go assist the diplomatic mission that was under attack.View attachment 215349
Brennan was caught twice Perjuring himself before Congress, caught illegally spying on US citizens, caught illegally spying on the media, caught illegally spying on the US Senate, and spying on USSC Justices.

Brennan was caught illegally running good to terrorists...

Brennan collaborated with the FBI to hide Russian crimes associated with the KGB Bank's efforts to acquire Uranium One until after the sale went through...

Brennan's and the CIA knew about Russian hacking and interference but the Obama administration did nothing about it...

Brennan was caught briefing a fake Russian-authored report to Congress as legitimate Intel in order to deceive Congress to appoint a Special Counsel as part of a conspiracy to overthrow the newly elected President.

And you claim the heroes of Benghazi - who fought the very terrorists Barry helped take over Libya, who were trying to kill the US Ambassador and other Americans - liars?!

Obama, himself, and Hillary both lied about the attack, calling it a 'Protest over a Video' ... much like he once called the Fort Hood Terrorist attack a 'Case of Workplace Violence'.

Obama, Hillary, Brennan...they all have been proven to have lied about the Benghazi attack ... but snowflakes call the heroes of Benghazi the liars.

Obama disappeared when the attack began. No one knows where he was.... Everyone knows where Paronto was - he was fighting to save Americans that never should have been in harm's way on 9/11/12.
 
how many Republican lead investigations into 'Benghazi' have there been already; six, seven, eight?

I f***ing lost count.

How many indictments so far? ZERO

F***ing next, please.


The public doesn't give a shit about that we want team Obama to admit it wasn't over a dumb ass video as they claimed and tried to bury it a few months before an election.

Its like these assholes seem to think that if it WAS over a YouTube video, it was somehow justified.

They lied because of the upcoming election and they didn’t want the narrative to be that ISIS is eating Obama’s lunch.
 
I'll wager you $5,000,000, or a lower amount, if you don't have that much, that you can't prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the CIA Chief of Base in Benghazi ordered the CIA rescue team not to go assist the diplomatic mission that was under attack.View attachment 215349
Brennan was caught twice Perjuring himself before Congress, caught illegally spying on US citizens, caught illegally spying on the media, caught illegally spying on the US Senate, and spying on USSC Justices.

Brennan was caught illegally running good to terrorists...

Brennan collaborated with the FBI to hide Russian crimes associated with the KGB Bank's efforts to acquire Uranium One until after the sale went through...

Brennan's and the CIA knew about Russian hacking and interference but the Obama administration did nothing about it...

Brennan was caught briefing a fake Russian-authored report to Congress as legitimate Intel in order to deceive Congress to appoint a Special Counsel as part of a conspiracy to overthrow the newly elected President.

And you claim the heroes of Benghazi - who fought the very terrorists Barry helped take over Libya, who were trying to kill the US Ambassador and other Americans - liars?!

Obama, himself, and Hillary both lied about the attack, calling it a 'Protest over a Video' ... much like he once called the Fort Hood Terrorist attack a 'Case of Workplace Violence'.

Obama, Hillary, Brennan...they all have been proven to have lied about the Benghazi attack ... but snowflakes call the heroes of Benghazi the liars.

Obama disappeared when the attack began. No one knows where he was.... Everyone knows where Paronto was - he was fighting to save Americans that never should have been in harm's way on 9/11/12.
 
John Tiegen claims:

"When we got the phone call. It was 23 minutes from the time we got the call to the time we got over there. Our station chief told me to stand down. I got out of the car and put my two cents in it. We could actually see the consulate was on fire. We said, “Hey, we need to get over there. We’re losing the initiative.” The chief of base operations said to stand down because we needed to come up with a plan. I told him it was too late. We needed to get eyes on and come up with a plan on the move. The final straw was when the State guy got on the radio and said, “If you don’t get here now, we’re all going to [expletive] die. We need your help now.”


Tiegen told Congress that the Chief's exact words were, "Stand down, you need to wait. You need to make a plan."

Tiegen told Congress the Chief told him to "stand down"
Kris Paronto liar benghazi - with hand up.jpg
while they were standing on the front porch of the CIA Annex. Tiegen told Congress that the Deputy Chief and the Security Team Leader were there when the Chief told him to "stand down."

The Chief, the Deputy Chief and the Security Team Leader dispute Tiegen's "stand down" claim. The Chief denies he told Tiegen to "stand down." The Deputy Chief and the Security Team Leader say they didn't hear the Chief tell Tiegen to "stand down."
 
how many Republican lead investigations into 'Benghazi' have there been already; six, seven, eight?

I f***ing lost count.

How many indictments so far? ZERO

F***ing next, please.


The public doesn't give a shit about that we want team Obama to admit it wasn't over a dumb ass video as they claimed and tried to bury it a few months before an election.
Of course it was at least triggered by the video, just like all the other attacks earlier that day across the Middle East d u h d u p e.
 
Tiegen told Congress that the Chief's exact words were, "Stand down, you need to wait. You need to make a plan."

For sake of argument, let's assume the Chief actually did tell Tiegen to, "Stand down, you need to wait. You need to make a plan."

In the military "stand down" is used to tell people, "be quiet" or "shut up."

The Chief was telling Tiegen to shut up, you need to wait. You need to make a plan.

The Chief had cleared the Security Team Leader to go when he told the Deputy Chief "absolutely", when the Deputy Chief told him the diplomatic mission was under attack and they needed to get over there.

The Security Team leader was concerned about a number of things as he made a plan for the rescue team.

He was concerned that they didn't know what they would be up against when they got to the diplomatic mission. He wanted to contact February 17 Martyrs Brigade for assistance. In particular, he wanted one of their machine gun trucks. (Unbeknownst to the Team Leader, Feb. 17 was already at the diplomatic mission with a machine gun truck doing battle with the attackers.)

The team leader was concerned that if six shooters went to assist the diplomatic mission, the CIA Annex would be vulnerable. There were eight shooters on the CIA Annex Security Team. One was out of the Annex on a mission with a CIA agent. That would leave only one shooter left to defend the Annex in the event of an attack. Also, the rescue team would be taking all of the security team's machine guns, grenade launchers and other "heavy stuff."

There was concern about a possible ambush or enemy roadblock or checkpoint. (Unbeknownst to the team leader, the enemy had set up roadblocks on the streets leading to the diplomatic mission to prevent assistance from reaching the diplomatic facility.

The Security Team Leader was concerned about getting into a Blue on Green situation, with Feb. 17 and the CIA rescue team shooting at each other.

After working the phones for about seven minutes, the Security Team Leader realized he was not going to be able to reach a Feb. 17 officer on the phone. He told the Chief they were going, ran to the lead vehicle, took the commander's seat and the rescue team departed the Annex.
 
Last edited:
how many Republican lead investigations into 'Benghazi' have there been already; six, seven, eight?

I f***ing lost count.

How many indictments so far? ZERO

F***ing next, please.


The public doesn't give a shit about that we want team Obama to admit it wasn't over a dumb ass video as they claimed and tried to bury it a few months before an election.
Why?

Would that make the dead rise from the grave?
 
I'll wager you $5,000,000, or a lower amount, if you don't have that much, that you can't prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the CIA Chief of Base in Benghazi ordered the CIA rescue team not to go assist the diplomatic mission that was under attack.View attachment 215349
This is a great example of the logical fallacy called an appeal to ignorance. “Prove it’s 100% true, if not it is false”.

Your apparent “liars of Benghazi” who were on the ground claim there was a stand down order. Just by your characterization of them right off the bat, your using another logical fallacy called an ad hominem (attacking a persons credentials or credibility instead of their claims), to suggest its a matter of he said she said.

What we do know with 100% certainty, there was a stand down order given to the carrier group right off of the coast. This group was prepared to send air assistance that would’ve arrived in 20 mins. They had a wide variety of options to provide assistance, including non-violent deterrence measures such as fly overs. We know that 2 of the defense contractors on the ground died using a laser designator to identify targets for air support that never came. We know that the excuses that were given by the administration about the situation that came out to be 100% false later. Excuses like this was all sparked by an obscure YouTube video that maybe was only viewed 1000 times. The supbeanoed emails showed this was the spin the administration decided to go with after the fact. We know the excuse given for the question of “how in the world was more help not provided at any point in this span of 13 hours that was requested on numerous occasions?” That excuse was the “fog of war”, a term that was pertinent in war pre satellite, drone, and advanced communication systems. We know that wasn’t the case since the administration was in constant contact with those on the ground, and had an around the clock drone flying overhead giving them all the visual data they needed in real time. We know that the help that was sent, the “liars of Benghazi”, were severely inadequate, and also claimed there was a stand down ordered they ignored. We also have all of the requests filed by the ambassador to send more security in the months leading up to this event. All of this and more point the arrow pretty strongly in the direction that the administration is guilty of some aggregious neglect, and tried to cover it up and put a more palatable spin on it.

So you’re going to run with the fact that there wasn’t a stenographer during the all conversations with chief of base as your “proof”?
 
ONE GUY claims there was a LOCAL stand down order...disputed by everyone else there.

There is no claim as to where this "order" came from if it was ever uttered.

Oh...
 
I'll wager you $5,000,000, or a lower amount, if you don't have that much, that you can't prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the CIA Chief of Base in Benghazi ordered the CIA rescue team not to go assist the diplomatic mission that was under attack.View attachment 215349
This is a great example of the logical fallacy called an appeal to ignorance. “Prove it’s 100% true, if not it is false”.

Your apparent “liars of Benghazi” who were on the ground claim there was a stand down order. Just by your characterization of them right off the bat, your using another logical fallacy called an ad hominem (attacking a persons credentials or credibility instead of their claims), to suggest its a matter of he said she said.

What we do know with 100% certainty, there was a stand down order given to the carrier group right off of the coast. This group was prepared to send air assistance that would’ve arrived in 20 mins. They had a wide variety of options to provide assistance, including non-violent deterrence measures such as fly overs. We know that 2 of the defense contractors on the ground died using a laser designator to identify targets for air support that never came. We know that the excuses that were given by the administration about the situation that came out to be 100% false later. Excuses like this was all sparked by an obscure YouTube video that maybe was only viewed 1000 times. The supbeanoed emails showed this was the spin the administration decided to go with after the fact. We know the excuse given for the question of “how in the world was more help not provided at any point in this span of 13 hours that was requested on numerous occasions?” That excuse was the “fog of war”, a term that was pertinent in war pre satellite, drone, and advanced communication systems. We know that wasn’t the case since the administration was in constant contact with those on the ground, and had an around the clock drone flying overhead giving them all the visual data they needed in real time. We know that the help that was sent, the “liars of Benghazi”, were severely inadequate, and also claimed there was a stand down ordered they ignored. We also have all of the requests filed by the ambassador to send more security in the months leading up to this event. All of this and more point the arrow pretty strongly in the direction that the administration is guilty of some aggregious neglect, and tried to cover it up and put a more palatable spin on it.

So you’re going to run with the fact that there wasn’t a stenographer during the all conversations with chief of base as your “proof”?


The CIA commander in Benghazi never requested combat air support.
 

Forum List

Back
Top