Nixon was forced to resign for less!

[JoeB131]

List these "eight" investigations.

1) Congress investigated and the Democrats blocked any action to protect your Messiah

2) The Obama FBI investigated Obama. And wow, they didn't find anything, LOL.

What are these other six?

Get back to me when you can actually pay attention. This wasn't about Obama, this was about Hillary and Benghazi, which was investigated eight times by a Republican Congress and found she did nothing criminal or wrong.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ Maybe he didn’t expect to win but he fought tooth and nail to the end. Hildabeast thought she had it in the bag and phoned in her campaign. Are you willing to concede that?

I think Hillary made a lot of mistakes.

So did the MSM by thinking you people were decent enough not to vote for a crazy person.

So did the GOP by letting this guy have the nomination when they knew he was nuts.

So did all the idiots who wasted their votes on third parties because Hillary had this in the bag.

So did Obama by not screaming about his ties to Russia from the rooftops instead of handling it confidentially.

Okay, so now that we've conceded a whole lot of mistakes were made, let's get back to the underlying problem.

Trump proves every day that he is unfit for office. How do we fix THAT?

/——/ No one let Trump win the nomination. He campaigned hard and won it. Hildabeast on the other hand need help in robbing Crazy Bernie of the nomination by using super delegates.

 

[easyt65]

NIXON WAS PART OF THE SPYING TEAM ... WHICH IN THIS CASE WOULD BE OBAMA, HILLARY, COMEY, LYNCH, ETC....

....DUMBASS...

 

[kaz]

List these "eight" investigations.

1) Congress investigated and the Democrats blocked any action to protect your Messiah

2) The Obama FBI investigated Obama. And wow, they didn't find anything, LOL.

What are these other six?

Get back to me when you can actually pay attention. This wasn't about Obama, this was about Hillary and Benghazi, which was investigated eight times by a Republican Congress and found she did nothing criminal or wrong.

 

[easyt65]

List these "eight" investigations.

1) Congress investigated and the Democrats blocked any action to protect your Messiah

2) The Obama FBI investigated Obama. And wow, they didn't find anything, LOL.

What are these other six?

Get back to me when you can actually pay attention. This wasn't about Obama, this was about Hillary and Benghazi, which was investigated eight times by a Republican Congress and found she did nothing criminal or wrong.

They did not rule she did nothing wrong - she abandoned Americans to NEEDLESSLY die.

Snowflakes liKe to point out how she was not 'indicted'....

....NO SHIT. IT WASN'T A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, DUMBASSES.

 

[JoeB131]

/——/ No one let Trump win the nomination. He campaigned hard and won it. Hildabeast on the other hand need help in robbing Crazy Bernie of the nomination by using super delegates.

well, no, she didn't, she got 3 million more votes than Bernie..

The Dems have the good sense to have super delegates because after McGovern won the nomination in 1972, they didn't want that happening agian.

The GOP could have stopped Trump. They refused to. and now here we are.

 

[JoeB131]

Oh Kaz, check this out..

Clinton: 7 Benghazi probes so far

 

[kaz]

List these "eight" investigations.

1) Congress investigated and the Democrats blocked any action to protect your Messiah

2) The Obama FBI investigated Obama. And wow, they didn't find anything, LOL.

What are these other six?

Get back to me when you can actually pay attention. This wasn't about Obama, this was about Hillary and Benghazi, which was investigated eight times by a Republican Congress and found she did nothing criminal or wrong.

They did not rule she did nothing wrong - she abandoned Americans to NEEDLESSLY die.

Snowflakes live to point out how she was not 'indicted'....

....NO SHIT. IT WASN'T A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, DUMBASSES.

And Joe is lying when he says the congressional investigations concluded Hillary did nothing wrong. Republicans didn't have the votes to pursue criminal charges, but Democrats didn't have the votes do state she did nothing wrong.

Joe's argument is equivalent to that it was a hung jury, that says the defendant did nothing wrong. Even a conviction doesn't state the defendant did nothing wrong, it only says there was a reasonable doubt.

What's funny is that Joe is right about the "eight investigations" though and he still can't produce a link. I Google everything before asking for a link. The eight is misleading and Joe lies about the conclusion, but he was right on that narrow fact

 

[JoeB131]

They did not rule she did nothing wrong - she abandoned Americans to NEEDLESSLY die.

Snowflakes live to point out how she was not 'indicted'....

....NO SHIT. IT WASN'T A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, DUMBASSES.

Then why have an investigation at all? Each one of these investigations found that this would have happened anyway, even if she did things she didn't do.

The main problem was, Ambassador Stevens chose to go to Benghazi even though he knew the security situation in that city was falling apart.

That's kind of on him, not her.

 

[kaz]

Oh Kaz, check this out..

Clinton: 7 Benghazi probes so far

Very good! You produced a link!

Now show where they " found {Hillary} did nothing criminal or wrong" and we'll be headed somewhere

 

[JoeB131]

What's funny is that Joe is right about the "eight investigations" though and he still can't produce a link. I Google everything before asking for a link. The eight is misleading and Joe lies about the conclusion, but he was right on that narrow fact

Um, not that I waste time on links, but I did... here it is again.

Clinton: 7 Benghazi probes so far

 

[kaz]

What's funny is that Joe is right about the "eight investigations" though and he still can't produce a link. I Google everything before asking for a link. The eight is misleading and Joe lies about the conclusion, but he was right on that narrow fact

Um, not that I waste time on links, but I did... here it is again.

Clinton: 7 Benghazi probes so far

Yes, you backed up that narrow fact with a link. I agree. Now show your conclusion that the eight investigations " found she did nothing criminal or wrong." That was the meaningful part of your claim.

If you can show that, I'll give you props for being right. But of course you're not. None of those "investigations" concluded that she did nothing illegal or wrong

 

[2aguy]

View attachment 205439

In 1972, Republican Operatives broke into the Democratic Offices at the Watergate. Richard Nixon didn't know about the break in, but he still tried to cover it up. There were payments to witnesses, firing of investigators and officials who were looking into it.

The break in had no effect on the election, the Democrats shit the bed and nominated George "Acid, Amnesty and Abortion" McGovern and Thomas "electric shock" Eagleton and lost 49 states.

But the very fact that Nixon participated in the cover up and obstructed the investigation into it was serious enough to force his resignation.

So now you have the President of the United States openly obstructing an investigation into Russian interference in an American election, going so far to say he believes the Dictator of Russia over our own intel community and law enforcement.

Joe.... you seriously need to stop mixing your meds with alchohol......

The FBI, the Department of Justice used fake information created by the DNC and the hilary campaign using actual Russian sources to get an illegal FISA warrant to spy on the opposition party......catching various members of the leadership of those agencies in emails stating they wanted to stop Trump....

And you post that silliness?

Get help.

 

[2aguy]

where's the evidence?

You mean other than the indictments, and trump's tacit admission yesterday that he believes Putin rather than our own intel agencies?

What indictments...... meuller indicted Russians who will never show up in court...... and he has indicted people for everything except interfering with an election, going back decades......

When he finally indicts people for actual crimes related to something even close to what he is supposed to be looking at.....then get back to us.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ No one let Trump win the nomination. He campaigned hard and won it. Hildabeast on the other hand need help in robbing Crazy Bernie of the nomination by using super delegates.

well, no, she didn't, she got 3 million more votes than Bernie..

The Dems have the good sense to have super delegates because after McGovern won the nomination in 1972, they didn't want that happening agian.

The GOP could have stopped Trump. They refused to. and now here we are.

/——/ I voted for McGovern. He was a decent and honest man back when Democrats were proud patriotic Americans. And the GOP did everything they could do to stop Trump and failed.

 

[easyt65]

Then why have an investigation at all?

The investigation was intended to be a FACT FINDING investigation to try to figure out what happened and how to make sure it never happened again.

The FACT was that the entire Benghazi mess was one giant F*-UP after another resulting in the extremely needless deaths of Americans:

1. The CIA was running weapons out of Benghazi to terrorists.

2. The Obama administration - especially the State Department - knew FOR MONTHS about the call for attacks on US Embassies and compounds throughout the entire Middle East on the anniversary of 9/11/01. THEY KNEW THIS WAS COMING!

3. THE STATE DEPARTMENT HIRED AN AL QAEDA-ASSOCIATED / AFFILIATED MILITIA TO PROTECT AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI FROM .... AL QAEDA.




4. As Al Qaeda presence grew and the situation became more violent in Benghazi and KNOWING there was a call for terrorist attacks on the anniversary of 9/11, EVERY other nation with people in Benghazi pulled their people out...everyone except the United States!

Again,


5. The US Ambassador informed the State Department that new terrorist training camps had opened up, Al Qaeda flags were flying over Benghazi Govt buildings, several hundred Al Qaeda members were in Benghazi, violence was growing, again every other nation had pulled their people out.....No response from the State Department.

6. The US State Department left the US Ambassador woefully unprepared. Stevens turned to asking other nations as they pulled out if he could use THEIR cement traffic blockades and other defensive equipment that he did not have.

7. Al Qaeda attacked the US Compound in Benghazi TWICE in the weeks leading up to the final attack on 9/11/12 - the last attack left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall. ANYONE with an ounce of military tactics / experience damn-well knew this was the terrorists testing the defensive responses of the Compound.

- The Al Qaeda-associated militia NEVER arrived on time in response to any of the attacks. They always got there just AFTER the attack. They QUIT just days before the final attack.

- The Team the State Department hired to protect the compound was basically the lowest bidder and HAD NO EXPERIENCE IN COMBAT AREAS OR COMBAT SITUATIONS. IN THEIR CONTRACT JOBS THEY NEVER CARRIED WEAPONS BEFORE. In other words, they were inexperienced, had no clue what the f* they were doing, and were not prepared to defend the compound from a terrorist attack.

8. It is on record that Ambassador Stevens requested additional security more than 50 (FIFTY) times - all of which were DENIED....even AFTER the 2 terrorist attacks on the compound prior to 9/11/12. In fact ,THE STATE DEPARTMENT TOOK AWAY SOME OF THE COMPOUND'S SECURITY FORCES AFTER THE 2 ATTACKS.

- Hillary would later LAUGH in front of Congress when asked about how the State Department continuously denied Ambassador Stevens' requests, even when he told them if the big attack on 9/11/12 went off and he did not have more security HE WOULD DIE! Hillary said she thought his continuous asking was A JOKE - PART OF HIS SENSE OF HUMOR!

AGAIN...


- Snowflakes and Liberals like to try to blame the GOP for cutting budgets which prevented the State Department from hiring more security. In doing so they ignore some pretty simple damn questions:
--- If they didn't have enough money to hire additional security, DID THEY HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO FLY THE AMERICANS OUT OF EBNGHAZI...LIKE EVERY OTHER NATION HAD DONE WITH THEIR PEOPLE ALREADY? (You can bet if Hillary's fat ass was in Benghazi for 2 terrorist attacks and knew the big one was coming on 9/11/12 she sure as hell wouldn't have stuck around for it.)


KNOWING a Middle-East-Wide terrorist attack was pending,
KNOWING the US Compound had already been attacked twice,
KNOWING the compound could not be easily defended,
KNOWING they did not have enough security personnel to protect the compound,
KNOWING the security forces there had no clue what they were doing,
KNOWING they had turned down more than 50 requests for additional security,
Again, KNOWING THE ATTACK WAS COMING.
KNOWING the military was 'not in position to help'

Obama / Hillary / the State Department did not PRE-POSITION US forces to a location where they could quickly respond if needed on 9/11/12.

They literally did not do a damn thing to prevent Americans from dying!

This was not rocket science. Hell, this was not even 6th grade science. Even you crazy snowflake M*erF*ers could do a better job protecting the Americans there, ESPECIALLY IF YOUR ASS HAD BEEN SITTING IN BENGHAZI PRIOR TO 9/11/12!

Let's go over a few ideas, shall we:

#1:
You DON'T hire AL QAEDA - who slaughtered 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01 - to protect Americans ... from AL QAEDA ... when an attack on the anniversary of 9/11/01 has been called for / is planned and the Americans you want to protect are in the middle of AL QAEDA LAND, the new nation Obama helped Al Qaeda take over for their own.

#2:
You hire EXPERIENCED security personnel who HAVE worked combat / hostile areas, who HAVE carried guns before, who DO know wtf they are doing to protect American lives in terrorist nations.

#3:
When you KNOW a Middle East-Wide terrorist attack on US Embassies and compounds have been called for / planned and every other nation has pulled their people out because of this and because of growing violence, you don't let your people STAY. You tell them - ORDER THEM - to GTFO!

#4:
If you weren't smart enough to pull your people out before, after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound leading up to the expected major attack on 9/11/12 YOU ORDER YOUR PEOPLE TO GTFO!
-- IF you are stupid enough to let them stay, YOU GIVE THEM MORE SECURITY PERSONNEL. YOU DON'T TAKE AWAY MORE OF THEIR SECURITY PERSONNEL.

#5:
If you know you can not afford to hire more security personnel, and know terrorist just blew a 4-foot hole in the Benghazi compound wall, going through their defenses like corn through a goose, YOU ORDER YOUR PEOPLE TO GTFO! You DON'T shrug your shoulders, blame the GOP, and say 'whatever happens to the Americans there is the GOP's fault' then LET THEM DIE!

#6:
KNOWING a terrorist attack is coming,
KNOWING you don't have enough security to protect Americans,
& being determined to keep the Americans in Benghazi,
YOU MAKE SURE A MILITARY TEAM IS PRE-POSITIONED IN ADVANCE TO BE ABLE TO RESPOND ASAP TO AN ATTACK ON THE COMPOUND.

#7:
When you get the notification that a terrorist attack 'JUST BEGAN' on a US compound, EVEN IF IT WILL TAKE HOURS FOR A MILITARY RESPONSE TEAM TO SHOW UP (BECAUSE YOU F*ED UP AND DID NOT PRE-POSITION THEM), EVEN IF YOU THINK THEY WILL NOT GET THERE IN TIME, YOU SEND THEM ANYWAY!
-- You DON'T know how long the fight will last.
-- You don't know if the compound can hold off the attackers until help can arrive.
-- You don't know if / how many might still be alive by the time you do get there.
-- You keep the team responding informed of what's going on while they ae in transit
-- Once the military team gets there it is there job to kill any terrorist M*erF*ers still on-site, to secure the area, to secure the Americans - dead or alive

Hillary and Barry could not have F*ed this up more if they had tried...but one good thing could be said for their performance / F*-Up: IT WAS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF EVERYTHING NOT TO DO.

And snowflakes and Democrats are so damn worried about being blamed for ANYTHING, they make the most stupid denials of the obvious!

Case in point, again: Hillary and Barry did 'nothing wrong'?

I would say choosing to leave Americans behind in an indefensible compound protected by AL QAEDA and an inexperienced, understaffed security team that had never carried weapons in a combat / hostile region before and failed to ensure a Military Quick Reaction Force was nearby to come to their rescue after 2 terrorist attacks and when they KNEW the larger attack was still pending on 9/11/12 counts as 'DOING SOMETHING WRONG'!

BTW, on 9/11/12 22 (TWENTY-TWO) US Embassies and Compounds throughout the Middle East were attacked - 2 were over-run - 4 Americans were killed. Again, they already KNEW this was coming! The immediate response by the WH and State Department (Obama and Hillary) that the Benghazi attack was in any way the result of a protest over a video was a panicked, knee-jerk reaction to the fear that they would be blamed for not pulling Americans out and getting them killed.

If Obama and Hillary had just been HONEST right up front - that 4 Americans were killed in a terrorist attack - it would have been a tragedy but no big serious deal as it turned into.

 

[easyt65]

Remember how I just said the Democrats are SO worried about being blamed for something / for being held accountable for anything that they engage in denial of the most obvious things in the world?

Case In Point:

1. Hillary Clinton and the DNC rigged primaries, cheated in debates, engage in election fraud, violated election laws, and broke campaign finance laws so that Hillary would be GIVEN the DNC Party nomination:

- Hacked and released DNC e-mails show the DNC ADMITTING THIS ... in their released e-mails.....

- DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile admitted it in the book she wrote and in the many public interviews promoting her book...

....but many Liberals / snowflakes continue to try to claim this did not happen. Others try to claim that dong so had no impact on the election.




2. During a time when Barak Obama KNEW about the Russian attempts to interfere and attempts to hack senior US Govt officials' / politicians' e-mails and servers, Hillary Clinton was operating an illegal unauthorized unencrypted
unsecured (all violations of rules/laws) server containing TOP SECRET+ data ...

-- EVERY e-mail and document on her server was illegally sent by Huma Abedin to her own personal illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured home laptop she shared with her convicted Pedophile husband who rested the laptop on his naked junk while he sexted under-aged girls. Who knows where the data went from there?!

-- Hillary gave illegal access to this date to a slew of people who had no security clearances - IT aides, lawyers, an IT Tech company that illegally stored the server in their BATHROOM, her maid....

-- In the end the US IG discovered and reported that due to a PHISHING app 6 foreign entities ended up receiving / acquiring the TOP SECRET Data - information Barak Obama described as 'so classified it could not be released in any format without causing grave damage to our national security' - from off of her server.

EVIDENCE - even the US IG's own report - shows this, and liberals / snowflakes STILL try to claim she did nothing illegal.

 

[Oldstyle]

/——/ Yes Einstein, the popular vote for president is the final determination in a democracy but in our Republic the Electoral College selects the president. It’s only been explained to you sore losers a million times. Stuck on stupid?

The people said no.

Trump has no legitimacy other than a technicality... He knows he's a fraud, that's why he's so insecure.

He just took his insecurity into a whole new level on Monday.

The Electoral College...which we've used to elect our Presidents for a REALLY long time...doesn't count? You're a bit of an idiot, Joey...just saying...

 

[August West]

There were 8 (eight) Benghazi investigations that produced no indictments, guilty pleas or criminal charges. See the difference?

It's not a "crime" to misjudge something...it's not a "crime" to mislead the families of the men who were murdered or the American people about what happened and who's to blame! That doesn't mean that what happened in Benghazi or what happened in Washington during and after the attack wasn't a disgrace. As for what SHOULD have produced indictments? The Benghazi investigations revealed Hillary Clinton's use of two private servers hidden in her house which she used to run the State Department...that she had classified materials on those servers which were not secure...that she destroyed evidence on those servers that had been requested by Congressional investigators...and that she lied to Congress repeatedly about turning over all relevant evidence regarding Benghazi!

The fact that she WASN'T indicted for what she did isn't proof of a lack of criminality on her part...it's indicative of the corruption that was rampant in the Obama Justice Department!

When a Benghaziist shows as much concern for the 4,500 who were killed looking for wmds that weren`t there as they do for the 4 (four) killed at Benghazi I may take them seriously. A private email server? BFD. If she lied to Congress why wasn`t she charged?

Wow, so you admit that Slick Willy, John Kerry and Hillary lied that the WMDs were in Iraq? Good job. There may be hope for you yet

Neither John Kerry, or anyone named Clinton invaded Iraq after Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors FAILED to find wmds in Iraq. This fiasco was the responsibility of one man and one man alone.

Of course they did. John Kerry and Hillary both voted for the invasion. You didn't know that? Seriously?

Bill Clinton: I saw the same reports and came to the same conclusions
John Kerry: "I was in favor of disarming Saddam Hussein, and I’m glad we did"
Hillary Clinton: We carried out, with the help of an alliance, a war in which we put Saddam Hussein back into his box

Here's the thing. I actually was against the war. I would gladly accept Democrats being allies in that effort to greatly reduce our military footprint in the world.

But you are liars. You support war, then oppose it, then support it. And you meddle worse than Republicans. Both Clinton and Obama jumped everyone's shit just like W did. You're a hypocrite and a liar. I don't need that for an ally. I need someone who says what you do when Republicans are in power, then says the same thing when Democrats are in power ...

There was never a vote for invasion. The vote was to authorize an invasion if Saddam refused to allow the UN weapons inspectors into Iraq....which he did. The vote was taken BEFORE Hans Blix and his team FAILED to find wmds.

 

[Two Thumbs]

poor joe

don't worry joe, I'm sure you will have enough evidence to oust trump by 2024.

"by 2024?" Get real! There's enough evidence now to get the shit stain out of office! Bigly!

then he would be out or at least being charged.

but I'm sure, next week, or month or year....