I may not use that word but I believe the overall point applies to anyone that defends any of it.
An a **** would sit quietly after President Obama and Sec of State watched an ambassador of the Untied States plead for help...and perish when none came.
President Trump reacted like President Obama and Sec Of State Clinton should have
If Trump had done the right thing, we have no troops in Iraq to be harmed.
If George W. Bush hadn't invaded Iraq in the first place, we wouldn't have been there in the first place.
No doubt but that doesn't excuse still being there.
Trump ran on getting us out of endless wars, but keeps being pressured by the Hawks on both sides of the aisle, as well as the Pentagon to stay for various reasons. The other thing is that no matter what you do, Islam is composed of two houses. The House of Islam and the House of War.
The House of Islam is responsible for the teachings of Muhammad and its adherence, while the House of War has the responsibility to commit to war (Jihad) against all infidels until only Islam rules the Earth. What we call terrorists are simply the para-military arm of Islam. Muslims can enter into "contracts" with infidels, however, it can only be on a temporary basis. But the goal always remains, to destroy all that is un-Islamic. Because of Islam's House of War, Islam's para-military arm will always be attacking soft targets, killing infidels. Are we to simply complain to Iran (or any other Islamic nation) when their para-military arm kills Americans, Thai's, Chinese, Hindus, Brits, Germans, Spaniards, Canadians, French, Danes, Kenyans, Filipinos, Russians and Dutch? All these nations and more have experienced attacks by Islamists. If you say, "well, they also attack other Muslims," true. However, the reason for this is that in the case of the Shiites and the Sunnis, they consider the other, not true Muslims, so what do you think about you!