Exactly the point. The NFL players can all kneel and show disrespect if they want.
But the people don't need to see it.
Mr. Goodall, their leader, just needs to get before the cameras and tell the people "tough shit this is the way its going to be, and if you don't want to see America disrespected turn something else on. TV sets can be tuned into movies, other sporting events, preachers sermonizing, etc. In fact, the NFL prefers you don't watch, if you are a racist or a conservative".
And yet how many hypocrites think it was OK for Tim Tebow to kneel on the field during the game?
and who was tebow protesting when he did this?
He was exercising first amendment rights. But I expected hypocritical responses nonetheless.
The First Amendment is restricting government from stopping free speech, not the NFL. I can't go into work tomorrow and tell my boss he's a lowlife MF and should kill himself and his family without getting fired. I have no first amendment rights at work nor do these football players.
That is correct. The players are not exercising First Amendment rights, because the NFL is within its rights to prohibit any non game related displays it wants. Hence, it demonstrates the NFL's position on things that it prohibited displays of faith but allows protests against the anthem and flag.
I'm not aware that the NFL "prohibited" either one. Got a linkie?
It does prohibit messages printed on uniforms but that's about it. I think any sport, or profession, that puts its personnel in uniforms has codes about their presentation.
And that is a big reason why the NFL is facing declining viewership.
Absolute. Steaming. Bullshit.
ALL sports, and in fact A
LL TV, is facing declining viewership as a result of ---- maybe you've seen this around --- the internets. Ever hear the term "cutting the cable"? Many years ago I figured out I could get anything I wanted that was on TV from the internets except elective live sports, which I'd have to pay extra for either way, so I fired my TV and scores of others have done the same thing for the same reason. I probably haven't watched a sports event any way other than streaming for at least ten years.
So you have no causation established here whatsoever --- you have a wishful thinking butthurt that we've already debunked a year ago. Football TV is down but so is baseball, basketball, hockey, college football and even NASCAR,
as is non-sports TV.
All for the same reason, not one you cherrypickers cherrypick and stick on like a some rhetorical feelgood filigree.
There's no such thing as a "media boycott" anyway. You couldn't do it even if you wanted to. You can turn your own TV off but you can't control anybody else. This mythology belies a basic cluelessness of what broadcast calls "ratings" and how they actually work. Audiences don't watch or listen to programs because they "agree" with them; they watch or listen because that program has grabbed their ATTENTION. And that's an
entirely different thing.
---- Which now brings up the third fatal flaw in this feelgood filigree theory: The national anthem playing
ISN'T EVEN PART OF THE BROADCAST IN THE FIRST PLACE. That means there's no way for a viewer to even
know what happened or didn't happen before the telecast began, because at that point he was watching talking heads in suits in some studio in New York
analyzing that week's games. So this cockamamie idea that "NFL is losing viewers" based on occasions that
aren't even broadcast on television, is exposed for the bullshitious swampland it is. Before this fake story came up nobody who hadn't personally been to a football stadium even knew the national anthem WAS played at NFL games, because why would it be?
Mind you, going back to point two about ratings, *IF* the general NFL fan base (and not just some wacko fringe on a message board) were genuinely upset about anthem nonconformity --- and *IF* those anthems were incorporated into the telecast --- the ratings would be driven *UP*. Because that's how the term "ATTENTION" works.
NFL wouldn't do that of course because it would throw off the timing between the 1pm and 4pm games but IF they did AND there was fan base discontent, THEN it would be a ratings boost with discontented fans tuning in to see whether they had a cue to be 'outraged' or not. Viewers
will tune in for something they DISagree with --- that's how ratings are
created. Fox Noise built an entire News Theater out of the concept. Controversy $ells, and always has.
Any time an entertainment outlet takes a political stance, it automatically runs the risk of alienating large portions of the audience.
That's exactly why the national anthem never should have been trotted into a football game in the first place, a setting where it has no function at all.
And it's also why the NFL, alone among pro sports,
sent back three-quarters of a million bucks of Pentagon taxpayer money that it had been paid to stage fake patriotism charades, once that scandal was exposed. Had they not started that shit in the first place and just got on with what they're supposed to be there for ----
a ******* FOOTBALL GAME, not a Jingo commercial ---- none of these threads would exist, Colin Kaepernick would be an obscure name in a trivia quiz, and Donald Rump would have had to find some other fake Rump Steak red meat to feed his robots.