Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel

Couldn't be further from truth, Israel and the US are the same on democracy index, Israel is also the 11th happiest country in the world.

We both know if Israel opens its gates - half of the Arabs in the middle east move there the 1st day, and the other half would abandon their shithole countries on the second day.

Ask Your fellow welfare frauds in Europe, they don't see a problem with turning the countries in which they have the highest quality of life into another version of the same tyrannies they ran from.

I just wonder when Tlaib starts selling Sharia as the last thing to "save America".
Israel has been a US foreign aid recipient since 1948.
 
The possibility of a two state solution died
20 years ago . There's no land left for even a small contiguous state. What will you do with all those inconvenient natives?
What they have is better then what the Jordanians left for the Jews after 1948, when the Jew were kicked out of their own ancient homeland in Judea, Samaria and the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem. Including not allowing the Jews to go to the Western Wall.

That sounded more like it was after the Romans kept the Jews from entering Jerusalem.

The Arab "natives" can do whatever they want including create their own country in those areas where they are. No they do not need to be continuous as they are waring clans either way. The PA and Hamas would continue to war for power as they are doing right now, just as they did when the Jews left Gaza in 2005.

They can go to Jordan, or Arabia, wherever their indigenous Arab hearts tell them to. There is also Lebanon, Syria. There is so much stolen land by the Arabs from the Indigenous people in the Middle East and North Africa, that All of it has become the "Arab Nation", or rather the Islamic Nation.

Being born, native, in a place, does not mean one owns the land. Just ask all of the Europeans who took over the Americas, Australia, New Zealand, Hawaii, etc.

They know who the Indigenous, native people of the areas are, just as Arabs and Europeans know that the Jews are the indigenous people of the Land of Israel.

Now, when are so many anti Jews Europeans and Muslims going to stop denying the Jewish rights to their own homeland and allow them to live in peace with the Christians and Muslims who do want to live in peace with the Jews in Israel, Judea and Samaria?

When is Tlaib and so many others going to start working towards putting an end to aid to Hamas and the PA as long as they insist on educating their populations to only want to kill Jews and destroy Israel?


Al Husseini, Arafat, Abbas, Hamas, not one of them wanted a two state solution. It is not 20 years, but 102 years since a possibility for a two state solution sailed away.

It sailed away every time the Arabs said no to a two state solution. 1937, 1947, 2000 etc


Keep bsing about the "natives" of the land and how they are being kept from having some life, or this or that by the Israelis, when you do know very well that it is Abbas and Hamas who are doing that with the hope that somehow Israel will be destroyed and the Islamic Caliphate will finally come to be.

Let us have your short, repeated response to the above.
 
The weekend’s fawning feature is about Rashida Tlaib—or more specifically, about the righteousness of Rashida Tlaib’s anti-Israel dogmas. It follows just a few months after the paper printed another flattering story about an anti-Israel (and anti-Jewish) activist, Gaza poetry professor Refaat Alareer.

The premise of the earlier piece was, commendably, retracted with an editors’ note acknowledging failures in reporting. (Alareer was feted as a bridge-builder, though he is a hatemonger.)

The new piece, which was published online on Thursday and is slated to appear in print in this weekend’s Sunday Magazine under the headline “What Rashida Tlaib Represents,” will get no such sweeping correction. That’s because author Rozina Ali was honest — not on the details of the conflict, but at least about the essence of Tlaib’s extreme positions.

Tlaib seeks an end to Israel. Ali more or less admits it. Tlaib is unhappy about Israel’s life-saving anti-rocket system, the Iron Dome. Ali doesn’t deny it. Indeed, to conceal these beliefs would be counterproductive, since the core premise of the piece is that they are noble positions.

In promoting that conclusion Ali plays tricks on her readers, with the tendentious characterizations starting at the very first sentence: “Last May,” she writes, “following protests in East Jerusalem over planned evictions of Palestinians, Hamas started firing rockets toward Tel Aviv, and Israeli airstrikes pounded residential buildings in the Gaza Strip.”
----------
Ali, at least, does mention the criticism that followed Tlaib’s slur about American supporters of Israel having “forgot[ten] what country they represent.” But she seems to miss that this example, too, belies her claim that accusations of antisemitism follow from mere “criticism of Israeli policies.” This, after all, was an allegation of dual loyalty levelled against Americans, not a comment on Israeli behavior.

As a whole, Ali’s piece is meant as a lesson about, first, why Tlaib should be seen as a hero, and second, why Americans are allegedly receptive to her extreme anti-Israel messages.

For Ali, the answer to the first question is that Tlaib is a hero because her extreme anti-Israelism. That’s the author’s prerogative.

The second question is best answered not by the arguments in Ali’s article, but by the very existence and nature of the piece, which is more of the same from a newspaper that too-often excuses, or even lauds, attacks on Israel’s legitimacy and Jews in general.

Here is yet another story taking aim at Israel. Here are yet more distortions meant to misinform readers about the conflict. When editors make a point of defaming the Jewish state and whitewashing Palestinian contributions to the conflict, and do so again and again, it would hardly be surprising if some readers take the bait.


I have never heard Rashida say anything bad about Jews.
 
The possibility of a two state solution died
20 years ago . There's no land left for even a small contiguous state. What will you do with all those inconvenient natives?
Israel already left Gaza. Olmert offered to leave most of the W Bank including most of E Jerusalem. Both were turned down. In addition, they are demanding “ Right of Return “ When Countries sign treaties there are benefits for both parties
I’m addition, the PLO has made it clear the Israelis will have no access to the Western Wall. Give me one reason why Israel 🇮🇱 should even consider the above
 
Israel already left Gaza. Olmert offered to leave most of the W Bank including most of E Jerusalem. Both were turned down. In addition, they are demanding “ Right of Return “ When Countries sign treaties there are benefits for both parties
I’m addition, the PLO has made it clear the Israelis will have no access to the Western Wall. Give me one reason why Israel 🇮🇱 should even consider the above
Why do Israelis pray at the wall of Fortress Antonia?
 
I asked a question. It was built by Herod in honor of Marc Anthony's daughter.
Go to the correct thread to attempt to destroy any Jewish history.

 

Forum List

Back
Top