- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,331
- 18,625
- 1,915
And law-abiding citizens don't bring in guns. Criminals do.Bullshit]
Laws in Chicago say "no guns"
Laws five miles away..."No problem"
Criminals do NOT care about laws.
Geography means nothing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And law-abiding citizens don't bring in guns. Criminals do.Bullshit]
Laws in Chicago say "no guns"
Laws five miles away..."No problem"
Bullshit. When it's legal to buy a gun and transport it five fucking miles and sell it...they do it.And law-abiding citizens don't bring in guns. Criminals do.
Criminals do NOT care about laws.
Geography means nothing.
This isn't a study..it's some dumbass like you writing a blog.
- In 2020, per capita murder rates were 40% higher in states won by Donald Trump than those won by Joe Biden.
- 8 of the 10 states with the highest murder rates in 2020 voted for the Republican presidential nominee in every election this century.
Third Way
www.thirdway.org
It's not legal for a citizen of one state to sell a handgun in any other state than there own or to sell one to a resident of another state without going through an FFL.Bullshit. When it's legal to buy a gun and transport it five fucking miles and sell it...they do it.
Exactly!Bullshit]
Laws in Chicago say "no guns"
Laws five miles away..."No problem"
Wrong.It is CHICAGO that has the strictest gun laws in the nation. It is CHICAGO the routinely, year after year, in the top five gun violence deaths.
Gun Control does not work. Full stop.
The numbers prove it.
Did you realize that New Yorks unconstitutional gun law has been on the books since the early 1900's. Crime in NYC, all during that time was elevated more often than not.
Clearly, it wasn't the gun law that lowered crime in NYC during the late 80s and early 90s. It was a better-policing policy.
‘In recognizing a constitutionally protected right to carry a handgun in public for self-defense, the court is telling us all that we are unsafe, but our elected representatives cannot rely on evidence-backed solutions to this violence. Instead, we must defend ourselves with deadly force.
This response does not seek to present a thorough discussion of the failings in Bruen. Time, and the collective brain trust of my more experienced colleagues, will bring these to light. Instead, I seek only to point out a few of the ways that the court has moved our country in a dangerous direction, in reckless disregard for the safety of our communities and our democracy.
In his opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas returns multiple times to the theme that somehow the Second Amendment has fallen into disfavor before the courts . . . This theme has become popular among gun rights advocacy groups, though it has been thoroughly discredited.’
Alito’s lie unwittingly exposes the fundamental flaw of conservative jurisprudence concerning the regulation of firearms, which is to surrender to fear and abandon any efforts to address crime that doesn’t involve violence.
Bruen is yet another example of the intellectual laziness and dishonesty of conservative jurists.
Wrong. As noted from historical proof, gun violence is a product of lax enforcement of jail sentencing.Wrong.
As already correctly noted: the gun violence in Chicago is the consequence of firearms lawfully purchased on other states with lax gun laws then unlawfully brought into the City.