What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New UK Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn: 21st century socialism for Britain!

anotherlife

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
6,456
Reaction score
377
Points
130
Location
Cross-Atlantic
Jeremy Corbyn wins UK's Labour Party leadership race - CNN.com

On his victory speech, Corbyn has announced that what the British want is 21st century socialism. And to pay for it, he promptly proposed to lift the borrowing cap of each municipal district.

So, if you ever wondered why your local taxes always go up and where they go, wonder no more. The pretence is off. And in the UK it is not only the home owners but every resident must pay the local tax, called council tax.

Also, Corbyn said that the Labor party is the party of the disadvantaged workers and not the banks.

How stupid are people that they don't see through this?

This is the first legislative proposal to take advantage of the newly gained isolation of the post brexit British public.

Discuss.
 

Phoenall

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
39,171
Reaction score
2,107
Points
1,115
Jeremy Corbyn wins UK's Labour Party leadership race - CNN.com

On his victory speech, Corbyn has announced that what the British want is 21st century socialism. And to pay for it, he promptly proposed to lift the borrowing cap of each municipal district.

So, if you ever wondered why your local taxes always go up and where they go, wonder no more. The pretence is off. And in the UK it is not only the home owners but every resident must pay the local tax, called council tax.

Also, Corbyn said that the Labor party is the party of the disadvantaged workers and not the banks.

How stupid are people that they don't see through this?

This is the first legislative proposal to take advantage of the newly gained isolation of the post brexit British public.

Discuss.





How soon before he brings back the "POLL TAX" that made each individual responsible for paying their own way. The biggest failure of the Tories as people just stopped registering and so were not on any list and so unaccounted for. The best system was paying local taxes on the size/value of your home, so Lord Muck and his mansion would pay £10,000 a year while his gardner would pay £10 a year. After all Lord muck would need the full police force and every fire engine if his home caught fire, so his costs would so much higher.

The champagne Socialists would destroy Britain in a second and see no harm in doing so, they would borrow from anywhere to fund their lavish spending on proven failures. leaving each person in the UK with massive bills and closure of their place of work.
 

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
34,224
Reaction score
11,573
Points
1,410
Location
Y Cae Ras
Why didn't he talk about Brexit?

The most important referendum the British have made.

It looks like a decent programme to rebuild our shattered economy.
I would like to see them go further in rolling back the privatisation of the NHS, abolishing the wretched academy schools and increasing pensions.
 

Challenger

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
5,586
Reaction score
723
Points
245
Location
United Kingdom
Why didn't he talk about Brexit?

The most important referendum the British have made.

Not his fault. That's a Tory cock up we and future generations will have to live with, what's to talk about? The fact that Cameron called the vote, lost it then legged it to let someone else clean up the mess? Worst Prime Minister we've ever had. President Obama was spot on when he said, "who is this lightweight?"
 
OP
anotherlife

anotherlife

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
6,456
Reaction score
377
Points
130
Location
Cross-Atlantic
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.
 

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
34,224
Reaction score
11,573
Points
1,410
Location
Y Cae Ras
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.
Makes me nervous but interest rates are at record lows and the economy needs a stimulus.
The fear is that the money will be controlled by fuckwits who dont know what they are doing.
 

Challenger

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
5,586
Reaction score
723
Points
245
Location
United Kingdom
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.

Seems with the neocon influence worldwie, people have forgotten basic Keynsian economics, the same economics that pulled the USA out of the great recession of the 20's and 30's. In the simplest possible terms the government spends money to stimulate economic growth increasing production and creating more jobs and the resultant taxation revenues pay off any extra debt incurred. The current model gives the wealth to the rich in the hope they provide the necessary growth and create jobs, etc. THe fallacy with this model is that it doesn't factor in to the equation, the fact that the rich will keep the wealth and grow richer, while the poorer members of society go to the wall.
 

Phoenall

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
39,171
Reaction score
2,107
Points
1,115
Why didn't he talk about Brexit?

The most important referendum the British have made.

It looks like a decent programme to rebuild our shattered economy.
I would like to see them go further in rolling back the privatisation of the NHS, abolishing the wretched academy schools and increasing pensions.






And even further than that in kicking out wales so that he will have even more money to waste. His policies are a passport to disaster that will result in loss of Jobs and tax revenues as the wealthy leave for new pastures, closure of hospitals, black outs, riots, closures and a bankrupt country all so you can have a pension with no actual spending power. What good is a pension that increases by 20% a year and paid in arrears if inflation is running at 30% a year. But then you welsh neo marxist dummies never were any good when it came to maths were you
 

Phoenall

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
39,171
Reaction score
2,107
Points
1,115
Why didn't he talk about Brexit?

The most important referendum the British have made.

Not his fault. That's a Tory cock up we and future generations will have to live with, what's to talk about? The fact that Cameron called the vote, lost it then legged it to let someone else clean up the mess? Worst Prime Minister we've ever had. President Obama was spot on when he said, "who is this lightweight?"







So you dont believe in democracy then, and that the people should have a saw in how they are governed. You just want a totalitarian state with the people used as slave labour to increase the wealth of the dictators in charge. How soon into the next neo marxist government would it be before they decided to throw our young girls to the muslims again and start to dissappear people from the streets for complaining about the crime
 

Phoenall

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
39,171
Reaction score
2,107
Points
1,115
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.
Makes me nervous but interest rates are at record lows and the economy needs a stimulus.
The fear is that the money will be controlled by fuckwits who dont know what they are doing.





Like you brainless neo marxist goons that borrow to get out of debt and then complain that you cant afford the rates. That is what he is proposing to do bankrupt the country to fulfill his pipe dream and then sell it off to fund his next failure. Makes me happy that interest rates are low as the wages are kept under control and inflation is going down. The economy is doing fine, in fact better than most other nations that have higher interest rates and inflation.
 

Phoenall

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
39,171
Reaction score
2,107
Points
1,115
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.

Seems with the neocon influence worldwie, people have forgotten basic Keynsian economics, the same economics that pulled the USA out of the great recession of the 20's and 30's. In the simplest possible terms the government spends money to stimulate economic growth increasing production and creating more jobs and the resultant taxation revenues pay off any extra debt incurred. The current model gives the wealth to the rich in the hope they provide the necessary growth and create jobs, etc. THe fallacy with this model is that it doesn't factor in to the equation, the fact that the rich will keep the wealth and grow richer, while the poorer members of society go to the wall.







Nor does it factor in that the government has to have the money, or the collateral, in the first place. The last neo marxist government put paid to that when it sold the Gold reserves leaving the UK penniless. Then they tried to stimulate the economy by opening the doors to uncontrolled migration and allowed in those unable to work and fill the coffers for them. So instead of showing a surplus it showed a steady deficit and still the unemployable streamed in to the country. We are now starting to run over the sides as we are full and all you can do is blame the current government for your neo marxist cock ups
 

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
34,224
Reaction score
11,573
Points
1,410
Location
Y Cae Ras
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.

Seems with the neocon influence worldwie, people have forgotten basic Keynsian economics, the same economics that pulled the USA out of the great recession of the 20's and 30's. In the simplest possible terms the government spends money to stimulate economic growth increasing production and creating more jobs and the resultant taxation revenues pay off any extra debt incurred. The current model gives the wealth to the rich in the hope they provide the necessary growth and create jobs, etc. THe fallacy with this model is that it doesn't factor in to the equation, the fact that the rich will keep the wealth and grow richer, while the poorer members of society go to the wall.







Nor does it factor in that the government has to have the money, or the collateral, in the first place. The last neo marxist government put paid to that when it sold the Gold reserves leaving the UK penniless. Then they tried to stimulate the economy by opening the doors to uncontrolled migration and allowed in those unable to work and fill the coffers for them. So instead of showing a surplus it showed a steady deficit and still the unemployable streamed in to the country. We are now starting to run over the sides as we are full and all you can do is blame the current government for your neo marxist cock ups
On which planet would Blairs government be marxists ?
 

Challenger

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
5,586
Reaction score
723
Points
245
Location
United Kingdom
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.

Seems with the neocon influence worldwie, people have forgotten basic Keynsian economics, the same economics that pulled the USA out of the great recession of the 20's and 30's. In the simplest possible terms the government spends money to stimulate economic growth increasing production and creating more jobs and the resultant taxation revenues pay off any extra debt incurred. The current model gives the wealth to the rich in the hope they provide the necessary growth and create jobs, etc. THe fallacy with this model is that it doesn't factor in to the equation, the fact that the rich will keep the wealth and grow richer, while the poorer members of society go to the wall.







Nor does it factor in that the government has to have the money, or the collateral, in the first place. The last neo marxist government put paid to that when it sold the Gold reserves leaving the UK penniless. Then they tried to stimulate the economy by opening the doors to uncontrolled migration and allowed in those unable to work and fill the coffers for them. So instead of showing a surplus it showed a steady deficit and still the unemployable streamed in to the country. We are now starting to run over the sides as we are full and all you can do is blame the current government for your neo marxist cock ups

On which planet would Blairs government be marxists ?

That would probably be planet Phoney? You know he makes things up don't you and tries to move the goalposts? The reality from Tax research UK
"Labour invariably borrows less than the Conservatives. The data always shows that.
"Labour has always repaid debt more often than the Conservatives, and has always repaid more debt, on average." The Conservatives have been the biggest borrowers over the last 70 years

article-1337561-0C62CAEF000005DC-535_634x404.jpg


Go Phoney! :lmao::lmao::lmao:
 

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
34,224
Reaction score
11,573
Points
1,410
Location
Y Cae Ras
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.

Seems with the neocon influence worldwie, people have forgotten basic Keynsian economics, the same economics that pulled the USA out of the great recession of the 20's and 30's. In the simplest possible terms the government spends money to stimulate economic growth increasing production and creating more jobs and the resultant taxation revenues pay off any extra debt incurred. The current model gives the wealth to the rich in the hope they provide the necessary growth and create jobs, etc. THe fallacy with this model is that it doesn't factor in to the equation, the fact that the rich will keep the wealth and grow richer, while the poorer members of society go to the wall.







Nor does it factor in that the government has to have the money, or the collateral, in the first place. The last neo marxist government put paid to that when it sold the Gold reserves leaving the UK penniless. Then they tried to stimulate the economy by opening the doors to uncontrolled migration and allowed in those unable to work and fill the coffers for them. So instead of showing a surplus it showed a steady deficit and still the unemployable streamed in to the country. We are now starting to run over the sides as we are full and all you can do is blame the current government for your neo marxist cock ups

On which planet would Blairs government be marxists ?

That would probably be planet Phoney? You know he makes things up don't you and tries to move the goalposts? The reality from Tax research UK
"Labour invariably borrows less than the Conservatives. The data always shows that.
"Labour has always repaid debt more often than the Conservatives, and has always repaid more debt, on average." The Conservatives have been the biggest borrowers over the last 70 years

article-1337561-0C62CAEF000005DC-535_634x404.jpg


Go Phoney! :lmao::lmao::lmao:
He is truly the King of the made up assertion. The fellow in the pic looks just as I imagined, muttering to himself about foreign made goal posts and neo marxist astroturf.
 
OP
anotherlife

anotherlife

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
6,456
Reaction score
377
Points
130
Location
Cross-Atlantic
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.
Makes me nervous but interest rates are at record lows and the economy needs a stimulus.
The fear is that the money will be controlled by fuckwits who dont know what they are doing.

I think they know what they are doing. It is called lining their pockets.
 
OP
anotherlife

anotherlife

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
6,456
Reaction score
377
Points
130
Location
Cross-Atlantic
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.

Seems with the neocon influence worldwie, people have forgotten basic Keynsian economics, the same economics that pulled the USA out of the great recession of the 20's and 30's. In the simplest possible terms the government spends money to stimulate economic growth increasing production and creating more jobs and the resultant taxation revenues pay off any extra debt incurred. The current model gives the wealth to the rich in the hope they provide the necessary growth and create jobs, etc. THe fallacy with this model is that it doesn't factor in to the equation, the fact that the rich will keep the wealth and grow richer, while the poorer members of society go to the wall.

That is the exact purpose why this current model was invented. I think that unlike in the 1930's, there is no will now to work for the people. It is very hard to argue with money. That's why they want the economy just like this.

Also, technology would invalidate Keynesian practices in the 21st century.
 
OP
anotherlife

anotherlife

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
6,456
Reaction score
377
Points
130
Location
Cross-Atlantic
Why didn't he talk about Brexit?

The most important referendum the British have made.

It looks like a decent programme to rebuild our shattered economy.
I would like to see them go further in rolling back the privatisation of the NHS, abolishing the wretched academy schools and increasing pensions.






And even further than that in kicking out wales so that he will have even more money to waste. His policies are a passport to disaster that will result in loss of Jobs and tax revenues as the wealthy leave for new pastures, closure of hospitals, black outs, riots, closures and a bankrupt country all so you can have a pension with no actual spending power. What good is a pension that increases by 20% a year and paid in arrears if inflation is running at 30% a year. But then you welsh neo marxist dummies never were any good when it came to maths were you

It would be interesting to know how Wales voted on brexit. I think the 40 % of Wales residents who speak Welsh, all voted against brexit. The winning pro brexit vote was all from the 60 % English there.

An advantage of hyper inflation is that it clears insane debt such as the student loan epidemic and the national housing mortgage based money laundering. Doesn't work too well for individuals with high unemployment statistics, but ...
 

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
34,224
Reaction score
11,573
Points
1,410
Location
Y Cae Ras
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.
Makes me nervous but interest rates are at record lows and the economy needs a stimulus.
The fear is that the money will be controlled by fuckwits who dont know what they are doing.

I think they know what they are doing. It is called lining their pockets.
There is a shabby history of public money being diverted into private pockets. All the way back to De Lorean. There are a huge number of scams available.
 

Phoenall

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
39,171
Reaction score
2,107
Points
1,115
It is interesting that he claims he is not the bankers' man, yet his entire financial balance plan for all his proposals is just more debt.

Seems with the neocon influence worldwie, people have forgotten basic Keynsian economics, the same economics that pulled the USA out of the great recession of the 20's and 30's. In the simplest possible terms the government spends money to stimulate economic growth increasing production and creating more jobs and the resultant taxation revenues pay off any extra debt incurred. The current model gives the wealth to the rich in the hope they provide the necessary growth and create jobs, etc. THe fallacy with this model is that it doesn't factor in to the equation, the fact that the rich will keep the wealth and grow richer, while the poorer members of society go to the wall.







Nor does it factor in that the government has to have the money, or the collateral, in the first place. The last neo marxist government put paid to that when it sold the Gold reserves leaving the UK penniless. Then they tried to stimulate the economy by opening the doors to uncontrolled migration and allowed in those unable to work and fill the coffers for them. So instead of showing a surplus it showed a steady deficit and still the unemployable streamed in to the country. We are now starting to run over the sides as we are full and all you can do is blame the current government for your neo marxist cock ups
On which planet would Blairs government be marxists ?







This one as he appointed only neo marxists like Brown and Copper to the cabinet, or should I say the union bosses did and he rubber stamped them
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$225.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top