SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 14,540
- 6,819
- 365
he confronted no man. show me that video. The one I got shows a man running at the man with a gun from 100 yards away. no one detains him, no one confronts him. nope, he is allowed free movement to the gun barrel without confrontation. show me your video now.they never detained anyone, they wanted to ask the man some questions. they can do that legally. there is no law forbidding someone from asking someone questions. You can post that one as you wish.well they never told the runner they were performing a citizen arrest. see they have to announce that to the suspect.The law being discussed ad nauseum is citizen's arrest. Did you give up that stupid argument?post a statute that says that a known burglary is required to detain someone for a probable cause? to get a warrant yes, but not to detain. you're in leftist land again.they don't need to know that. it's why they call them suspects. anyone can be detained.It’s not up to him, they have property of concern, they don’t want a pattern developed it’s really simple. Go to the south side of ChicagoThe owner of the property Mr. English said nothing was ever taken, he did not know the McMichaels and only met one of them once when he bought the property. At no time did English ever ask McMichaels to do anything on his behalf. This begs the question what business was it of the McMichaels? Absolutely none. Do people in Georgia always find it agreeable to stick their nose in another mans business? The McMichaels seem to think so.
Bing
www.bing.com
It is up to him. It is his property. Only he can file a complaint for Trespassing. And his testimony at the trial is going to be really harmful for the defense.
Nonsense...again you prove you lack legal expertise despite all your tutoring from para-legals bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa As has been pointed out to you many times nothing that happened before the black guy assaulted the younger McMichaels has any relevancy....no matter what happened before....even if he had been followed, harassed, or falsely arrested (none of which happened) gave him (the insane negro) the right to committ assault...try and wrap your head around that if you want to stop looking so stupid.
Again. That is where you are wrong according to actual lawyers.
![]()
The Ahmaud Arbery Killing and Georgia Law
Explaining the legal issues surrounding the incident of two white men shooting a black jogger they suspected of a crimearcdigital.media
The most important part of this statute is the unwritten bit — you are allowed to make arrests only with “reasonable force.” You can’t burn down an orphanage to catch one child snatching extra bowls of gruel. And the Georgia Supreme Court has held, as a matter of law, that you can’t chase someone down with a weapon because you think they have committed burglary. For example, it held that there was no evidence of a “citizen’s arrest” when a man with a baseball bat chased down someone who burglarized his home.
The McMichaels will have a hard time establishing that a crime was committed within their presence or immediate knowledge. But even if they get past those serious hurtles, they’re still stuck justifying hemming an unarmed man in with a truck and guns when those acts are each serious felonies under Georgia law.
Actual Lawyers seem to think you are wrong. But what do they know. I assume you have a BAR card and are licensed in Georgia. I honestly hope you are on the way to take over the defense of the McMichaels because they need all the legal help they can get. Because actual Georgia law applies to actual cases and decided by the actual Georgia Supreme Court says you are actually wrong.
They did not do anything unreasonable in making the arrest.
He only got shot because he grabbed a gun, this is reasonable self defense.
Chasing someone with a weapon and SHOOTING someone with a weapon are two different things. It used to be legal to shoot thieves, that's what you are talking about.
They could NOT arrest him as he had not committed a felony in their presence. Now, push the "I believe" button and STFU until you have something intelligent to add. Judging by your iQ, that will be never!
Wrong answer! That room temp range IQ is doing you no favors. They reading the Constitution.
If they were not performing a citizen's arrest, they had no business detaining him illegally. You just lost your own argument, fucktard!
There is a law about confronting a man armed and acting aggressive.
You keep bouncing back and forth. The Video is all. Then the report is all and the video doesn’t matter. And then it is back to the video is all. Please tell me you are not representing the McMichaels. Because with you as their lawyer they would get no fair trial and be sentenced to twenty years in the electric chair.