- May 20, 2009
- 145,646
- 68,452
- 2,330
Clearly the satellite is a DENIER!!!! and refused to report on the massive CO2 emanations in big cities in America, China and India.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they haven't reached out to Mann for the hide the decline yet.Clearly the satellite is a DENIER!!!! and refused to report on the massive CO2 emanations in big cities in America, China and India.
it was there, but it was hidden by the clouds....the volcano did it!!! the dog ate my homework......Doh!!!!!Is there any sane person that can look at the satellite data and think for a second that human industry and big cities generate CO2?
They found deviations from the models. As expected. And they found the CO2 coming from the expected places, then mixing in the atmosphere. Differances of only about 10 ppm high to low from place to place. And I saw no indications of tectonic sources for CO2 in the AGU presentation. Plenty of biomass and industrial sources which were blown around until well mixed. Overall, the models were in the ballpark, just lacking the detail that the satellite is now giving us. When that data is applied, and the next models made, they will be closer to reality, but still not exact. Too much chaos in the system for that.
They do the "nuts and bolts' and yet they can't do the simple math. How is it that whenever their "nuts and bolts" work is actually looked at...it's wrong?
How is that olfraud? You claim these are the best and brightest and every time they release something it is ripped to shreds in hours or days. Now they are simply to frightened to release anything at all.
and the LoSiNg continues!!! Thanks for playing!!! Just because you can put it in print, don't make it so. And to date, you have Zip dude/dudette!!!! But again, thanks for playing!!!!!Thread summary:
The OCO-2 satellite is in excellent agreement with the models. Hence, the denier march into delusion is accelerating.
As Kevin Trenberth said, it was travesty we didn't have the instruments out there to prove the theories. Now we're getting them. Another instrument is scheduled to go up Friday (this morning's launch was scrubbed), an aerosol measurement device to be mounted on the ISS. Bad news for deniers, being they only find breathing space in the gaps of our knowledge. The more gaps we close, the further deniers need to retreat into conspiracy-land.
right, that's it.I'm curious. What atmospheric layer is the satellite looking at? That model is likely portraying CO2 in the full height of the atmosphere. I strongly suspect that OCO's sensitivity is altitude-dependent.
hat tip to asterism
Oct 1- Nov 11
not even close. (edit- go to 2:34 for Nov 1)
it is also interesting that CO2 hotspots seem to be present in tectonically active areas. NASA 8217 s new Orbiting Carbon Observatory shows potential tectonically-induced CO2 input from the ocean Watts Up With That
Not that Ian or any of the other denialists will actually watch the real scientists that built and run this program describe what they are seeing. They would rather listen to the lies of WUWT.
right, that's it.I'm curious. What atmospheric layer is the satellite looking at? That model is likely portraying CO2 in the full height of the atmosphere. I strongly suspect that OCO's sensitivity is altitude-dependent.
Are you from royalty? Because you sure are the king of excuses.
I'm curious. What atmospheric layer is the satellite looking at? That model is likely portraying CO2 in the full height of the atmosphere. I strongly suspect that OCO's sensitivity is altitude-dependent.
Empirical evidence vs Old Crocks model. Hmmm.... who to believe?I'm curious. What atmospheric layer is the satellite looking at? That model is likely portraying CO2 in the full height of the atmosphere. I strongly suspect that OCO's sensitivity is altitude-dependent.
Didn't you watch Old Rock's video?
yawn!!!!!!So why are the deniers here all still openly lying about how the model supposedly doesn't agree with OCO-2?
Rhetorical question. We know why. Their cult ordered them to lie, so they're lying.
hat tip to asterism
Oct 1- Nov 11
not even close. (edit- go to 2:34 for Nov 1)
it is also interesting that CO2 hotspots seem to be present in tectonically active areas. NASA 8217 s new Orbiting Carbon Observatory shows potential tectonically-induced CO2 input from the ocean Watts Up With That