Netanyahu's unwelcome visit to the U.S.

If Obama wants to see the PM he can go to congress. If congress invites the PM it should not have to go through the WH. If the PM is invited to speak at any university or forum in the US, especially if he has useful information on Iran or terrorism, it should have have to go through the WH. If he is invited to speak on a news program it should have to go through the WH.
Heads of state are not required to apply for visa before traveling to the US.
It might be polite to write or call before arriving on a door step but not required.
Really? I mean, how does a fascist Phalange give advice on Democracy by the People?
Comical.




Not as comical as your posts sometimes, they brighten my day for their comedy value alone.

His joke is getting boring.
 
If Obama wants to see the PM he can go to congress. If congress invites the PM it should not have to go through the WH. If the PM is invited to speak at any university or forum in the US, especially if he has useful information on Iran or terrorism, it should have have to go through the WH. If he is invited to speak on a news program it should have to go through the WH.
Heads of state are not required to apply for visa before traveling to the US.
It might be polite to write or call before arriving on a door step but not required.
Really? I mean, how does a fascist Phalange give advice on Democracy by the People?
Comical.




Not as comical as your posts sometimes, they brighten my day for their comedy value alone.

His joke is getting boring.
Pony up to Phoney, two fascists in a pea pod!
 
You're the one to talk about being Patriotic? LOL. Patriotic Israelis don't by hypocritical leftist ballcrap, that's the first definition of being a true Zionist.

In other words, patriotics are those who probably piss you off the most. :)
Truth and justice IS the American way. However, those values are something Zionists choose not to embrace.

The difference between you and me, I can prove it's "bullcrap"; whereas you only label it as such.
 
If Obama wants to see the PM he can go to congress. If congress invites the PM it should not have to go through the WH. If the PM is invited to speak at any university or forum in the US, especially if he has useful information on Iran or terrorism, it should have have to go through the WH. If he is invited to speak on a news program it should have to go through the WH.
Heads of state are not required to apply for visa before traveling to the US.
It might be polite to write or call before arriving on a door step but not required.
Really? I mean, how does a fascist Phalange give advice on Democracy by the People?
Comical.




Not as comical as your posts sometimes, they brighten my day for their comedy value alone.

His joke is getting boring.



Its not a joke, it is his NAZI RACISM that he cant control. If ever his kind get into power we can expect millions to be murdered for the cause
 
If Obama wants to see the PM he can go to congress. If congress invites the PM it should not have to go through the WH. If the PM is invited to speak at any university or forum in the US, especially if he has useful information on Iran or terrorism, it should have have to go through the WH. If he is invited to speak on a news program it should have to go through the WH.
Heads of state are not required to apply for visa before traveling to the US.
It might be polite to write or call before arriving on a door step but not required.
Really? I mean, how does a fascist Phalange give advice on Democracy by the People?
Comical.




Not as comical as your posts sometimes, they brighten my day for their comedy value alone.

His joke is getting boring.
Pony up to Phoney, two fascists in a pea pod!




It is you and the rest of team Palestine that are the FASCIST, I am a pragmatist with socialist leanings
 
You're the one to talk about being Patriotic? LOL. Patriotic Israelis don't by hypocritical leftist ballcrap, that's the first definition of being a true Zionist.

In other words, patriotics are those who probably piss you off the most. :)
Truth and justice IS the American way. However, those values are something Zionists choose not to embrace.

The difference between you and me, I can prove it's "bullcrap"; whereas you only label it as such.




You ignore truth and justice when they show the Jews have more legal rights than the arab muslims
 
He is the POTUS, and that makes him the most powerful man in the world, like it or not.
 

To the editor:
For decades, U.S. presidents have urged the Israeli government to stop building Jewish settlements in the West Bank.


Yes, many of us have long been aware of this ridiculous restraint, and the long term harm it causes Israel and Israeili security concerns. I'm glad an Israeli leader finally has the balls to ignore that travesty of justice and right.

The usual 'international law' nonsense is BS, of course, not even worth a long comment on.
 
You ignore truth and justice when they show the Jews have more legal rights than the arab muslims
You haven't shown that. You claim it a lot, but you've never proven anything thing close to it. You just hope people are as stupid as you are and might think its true, but I know better. All you do is bullshit. And it's not even good bullshit.
 
You ignore truth and justice when they show the Jews have more legal rights than the arab muslims
You haven't shown that. You claim it a lot, but you've never proven anything thing close to it. You just hope people are as stupid as you are and might think its true, but I know better. All you do is bullshit. And it's not even good bullshit.



I have shown it repeatedly, it is you and the rest of team Palestine that ignore CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW when it applies to the Jews. Like the fact that the legal owners of Palestine gave the land of Palestine to the Jews and not the arab muslims. That the Jews were attacked by the arab muslims as far back as 1920 and not the other way round, and this has been the case ever since.
 
I have shown it repeatedly, it is you and the rest of team Palestine that ignore CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW when it applies to the Jews. Like the fact that the legal owners of Palestine gave the land of Palestine to the Jews and not the arab muslims. That the Jews were attacked by the arab muslims as far back as 1920 and not the other way round, and this has been the case ever since.
I keep asking you to produce that "CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW" keep referencing, but you never do.

BTW, there's no such thing as "CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW".
 
I have shown it repeatedly, it is you and the rest of team Palestine that ignore CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW when it applies to the Jews. Like the fact that the legal owners of Palestine gave the land of Palestine to the Jews and not the arab muslims. That the Jews were attacked by the arab muslims as far back as 1920 and not the other way round, and this has been the case ever since.
I keep asking you to produce that "CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW" keep referencing, but you never do.

BTW, there's no such thing as "CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW".



But I have it is the treaties by the LoN in 1920, 1922 and 1924. Here are the maps from those treaties


April 24 1920 the LoN agreed that the National home of the Jews would be on this land


images



Amended to this after trans Jordan was conceived and invented July 24 1922

images



The treaty of Sevres accepted the following
The three principles of the British Balfour Declaration regarding Palestine were adopted in the Treaty of Sèvres: which was never ratified as the Turkish war of independence was in force

The treaty of Lausanne superseded the treaty of Sevres and was ratified by Turkey, including the reparation for WW1 that include3d the loss of lands in Europe, Middle East, Africa and Americas to the LoN who them created Mandates with the view of creating new nations on these lands.

These became CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW as in they were thought of by the majority of people to be an International Law.
 
Getting back to the OP

I posted before that the White House knew all along about Netanyahu's visit and that he accepted the invitation only after the White House admitted knowing it. Now all the Democrat comrades are on their high horse about the speech even while knowing that the Liar-In-Chief does it again. Here''s what the NYT had to correct.

In a surprising correction issued by the New York Times, who was one of the first news outlets to break the story, it appears that the administration had been informed well in advance of the invitation before Netanyahu accepted it.

The correction, which was added on January 30 in the online version of the article only, stated:

Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel accepted Speaker John A. Boehner’s invitation to address Congress. He accepted after the administration had been informed of the invitation, not before.

Despite what the White House has been saying, officials were in no way blindsided by Netanyahu’s invitation to speak to Congress.


Read more at White House Fabricated Spat with Netanyahu - Israel News
 
But I have it is the treaties by the LoN in 1920, 1922 and 1924. Here are the maps from those treaties


April 24 1920 the LoN agreed that the National home of the Jews would be on this land


images



Amended to this after trans Jordan was conceived and invented July 24 1922

images



The treaty of Sevres accepted the following
The three principles of the British Balfour Declaration regarding Palestine were adopted in the Treaty of Sèvres: which was never ratified as the Turkish war of independence was in force

The treaty of Lausanne superseded the treaty of Sevres and was ratified by Turkey, including the reparation for WW1 that include3d the loss of lands in Europe, Middle East, Africa and Americas to the LoN who them created Mandates with the view of creating new nations on these lands.

These became CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW as in they were thought of by the majority of people to be an International Law.
Now that was a good post!

You specifically addressed my point and provided 3 examples to prove yours. Bravo! I don't know why you don't do that more often?

Now, regarding your proof...

The Balfour Declaration had a caveat...

From your link..

His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
The state of Israel could not be created if it prejudiced the rights of the indigenous, non-Jewish residents in Palestine. And clearly, that's exactly what Zionists did. Driving over 700,000 arab residents from their homes through the use of Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun, is certainly denying them their rights.
 
But I have it is the treaties by the LoN in 1920, 1922 and 1924. Here are the maps from those treaties


April 24 1920 the LoN agreed that the National home of the Jews would be on this land


images



Amended to this after trans Jordan was conceived and invented July 24 1922

images



The treaty of Sevres accepted the following
The three principles of the British Balfour Declaration regarding Palestine were adopted in the Treaty of Sèvres: which was never ratified as the Turkish war of independence was in force

The treaty of Lausanne superseded the treaty of Sevres and was ratified by Turkey, including the reparation for WW1 that include3d the loss of lands in Europe, Middle East, Africa and Americas to the LoN who them created Mandates with the view of creating new nations on these lands.

These became CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW as in they were thought of by the majority of people to be an International Law.
Now that was a good post!

You specifically addressed my point and provided 3 examples to prove yours. Bravo! I don't know why you don't do that more often?

Now, regarding your proof...

The Balfour Declaration had a caveat...

From your link..

His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
The state of Israel could not be created if it prejudiced the rights of the indigenous, non-Jewish residents in Palestine. And clearly, that's exactly what Zionists did. Driving over 700,000 arab residents from their homes through the use of Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun, is certainly denying them their rights.




Not according to International law at the time the Balfour declaration was written. That is what you need to understand before trying to jump ahead 70 years. In the early 20C that meant something completely different to what it means today. The civil and religious rights of the non muslims were prejudiced when the arab league invaded and tried to wipe out the Jews, just as the civil and religious rights of non muslims were prejudiced by the arab muslims. So why don't you mention those breaches of Balfour instead of trying to always attack the Jews.

Now go away and look at the true meaning of Balfour as it applied at the time Balfour was written, and not what you think it means today, and see how far out you are in your assumptions

As for your assumption that 700,000 arab muslims were driven from their homes, even the best estimates cant show more than 50,000 were driven out. The reason for this is that the Jews did not want to leave armed enemies behind them, so took the least harsh treatment and evicted the arab enemy out of what would become Israel as allowed under International law at the time
 
Getting back to the OP

I posted before that the White House knew all along about Netanyahu's visit and that he accepted the invitation only after the White House admitted knowing it. Now all the Democrat comrades are on their high horse about the speech even while knowing that the Liar-In-Chief does it again. Here''s what the NYT had to correct.

In a surprising correction issued by the New York Times, who was one of the first news outlets to break the story, it appears that the administration had been informed well in advance of the invitation before Netanyahu accepted it.

The correction, which was added on January 30 in the online version of the article only, stated:

Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel accepted Speaker John A. Boehner’s invitation to address Congress. He accepted after the administration had been informed of the invitation, not before.

Despite what the White House has been saying, officials were in no way blindsided by Netanyahu’s invitation to speak to Congress.


Read more at White House Fabricated Spat with Netanyahu - Israel News
No comments from the left?
 
Madeleine Albright Netanyahu Should Deal With Problems In His Neighborhood Instead Of Speaking To Congress

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said she thinks Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should not travel to the United States to give a speech to a joint session of Congress next month.

"He is interfering in our internal affairs, and I don't want to interfere in Israeli internal affairs, but it strikes me that there's an awful lot going on in his neighborhood in the Middle East, and that's where he should be," Albright told MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell on Wednesday.
 

Forum List

Back
Top