Netanyahu to Attend a USS Liberty Memorial?

What lie? It's an Israeli Supreme Court decision you idiot.

Israel was being compared to a secular democracy, the United States, not another theocracy.
So what?! Just like all other countries not everybody is entitled to citizenship. Now go ahead and answer how long "Muslims for Christ" would live asking Palestinian savages. LOL.
kinda drives a stake through the idea of an ancestral right to the land. just saying.
How so?
people with the same ancestry don't have a right to live there because of different beliefs

so ancestry cant be basis for the claim

America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.
 
What lie? It's an Israeli Supreme Court decision you idiot.

Israel was being compared to a secular democracy, the United States, not another theocracy.
So what?! Just like all other countries not everybody is entitled to citizenship. Now go ahead and answer how long "Muslims for Christ" would live asking Palestinian savages. LOL.
kinda drives a stake through the idea of an ancestral right to the land. just saying.
How so?
people with the same ancestry don't have a right to live there because of different beliefs

so ancestry cant be basis for the claim

America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.

Well, that's a good one. That's exactly how the Muslims justify their treatment of non-Muslims in Islamic states.

ZioNazis are good at shooting themselves in the foot. LOL
 
I only bring the Nazi mufti up because you morons keep calling the Israelis Nazis, forgetting that Palestinians were real Nazis. And I will continue to do so, everytime I see someone accuse the victims of Nazis of being Nazis.

Really roodboy?

But it was you who started the thread about the Mufti AGAIN wasn't it? Palestinian Nazi Mufti who killed thousands of Christians

I guess it's just part of the zionut mantra you been taught!

Try finding a new drum to band that is factual dummy!

Too funny.


Yup, hilarious...



The Croatians and Bosnians of the Independent State of Croatia did not need the Mufti to attack Serbs.

In terms of seeking German support to try to prevent the British sponsored Zionist invasion and colonization of Palestine, the Mufti was doing exactly what he should have been doing for the native inhabitants of Palestine.

We already have a thread dedicated to this where you tried to whitewash the genocidal Nazi maniac that the Mufti was, and your lies did not pay off as usual. Quit derailing this thread.


You are the ZioNazi maniac. The Mufti was doing the rational thing, he was seeking help from the Germans to prevent the Zionists from invading and colonizing Palestine. The Mufti killed no one.

You are the constant liar. You have never posted anything but propaganda.
 
So what?! Just like all other countries not everybody is entitled to citizenship. Now go ahead and answer how long "Muslims for Christ" would live asking Palestinian savages. LOL.
kinda drives a stake through the idea of an ancestral right to the land. just saying.
How so?
people with the same ancestry don't have a right to live there because of different beliefs

so ancestry cant be basis for the claim

America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.

You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
 
Really roodboy?

But it was you who started the thread about the Mufti AGAIN wasn't it? Palestinian Nazi Mufti who killed thousands of Christians

I guess it's just part of the zionut mantra you been taught!

Try finding a new drum to band that is factual dummy!

Too funny.


Yup, hilarious...



The Croatians and Bosnians of the Independent State of Croatia did not need the Mufti to attack Serbs.

In terms of seeking German support to try to prevent the British sponsored Zionist invasion and colonization of Palestine, the Mufti was doing exactly what he should have been doing for the native inhabitants of Palestine.

We already have a thread dedicated to this where you tried to whitewash the genocidal Nazi maniac that the Mufti was, and your lies did not pay off as usual. Quit derailing this thread.


You are the ZioNazi maniac. The Mufti was doing the rational thing, he was seeking help from the Germans to prevent the Zionists from invading and colonizing Palestine. The Mufti killed no one.

You are the constant liar. You have never posted anything but propaganda.

How do you seek help by forming a Muslim army that killed Jews and Christians in EUROPE? How do you seek help by encouraging the Nazis and Arabs to "kill the Jews where you find them, this pleases Allah".

You are an IslamoNazi terrorist appeaser posing as a Christian spreading lies and propaganda.

The mufti wasn't only about "Palestine" he was about the extermination of Jews and Christians from the Middle East.

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers

Four years later, al-Husseini threw his support to a pro-Nazi revolt in Iraq against the British-backed prime minister, Nuri Said Pasha. Going to Baghdad, al-Husseini issued a fatwa for a jihad against the British. Barely a month later, British troops ended the coup and occupied the country, whereupon al-Husseini fled to Iran. Although given sanctuary in the embassies of Japan and Italy, al-Husseini was again forced to be on the move when Iran was itself occupied by the British and Soviet armies. Al-Husseini made his way out of Iran with Italian diplomats who provided him with an Italian passport. He shaved his beard and dyed his hair to avoid being recognized by British agents and Iranian police.
 
Last edited:
kinda drives a stake through the idea of an ancestral right to the land. just saying.
How so?
people with the same ancestry don't have a right to live there because of different beliefs

so ancestry cant be basis for the claim

America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
 


The Croatians and Bosnians of the Independent State of Croatia did not need the Mufti to attack Serbs.

In terms of seeking German support to try to prevent the British sponsored Zionist invasion and colonization of Palestine, the Mufti was doing exactly what he should have been doing for the native inhabitants of Palestine.

We already have a thread dedicated to this where you tried to whitewash the genocidal Nazi maniac that the Mufti was, and your lies did not pay off as usual. Quit derailing this thread.


You are the ZioNazi maniac. The Mufti was doing the rational thing, he was seeking help from the Germans to prevent the Zionists from invading and colonizing Palestine. The Mufti killed no one.

You are the constant liar. You have never posted anything but propaganda.

How do you seek help by forming a Muslim army that killed Jews and Christians in EUROPE? How do you seek help by encouraging the Nazis and Arabs to "kill the Jews where you find them, this pleases Allah".

You are an IslamoNazi terrorist appeaser posing as a Christian spreading lies and propaganda.

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers


Because he did not form any army. That's a bunch of propaganda. The army of the Independent State of Croatia, which included Bosnian units, was formed in 1941 when the state was under Italian rule. The Arab army you are claiming he formed was formed by the Germans and 90% of the troops were from French North Africa, for obvious anti-colonial reasons. A tiny part were from the Middle East, much less Palestine.

The Mufti was completely justified in doing whatever necessary to try to prevent the colonization of Palestine and the on-going killing of Palestinians by the Zionists.
 
people with the same ancestry don't have a right to live there because of different beliefs

so ancestry cant be basis for the claim

America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
Based on the fact that the land belonged to the Ottomans who joined the Germans in WWI and were defeated by the British who decided to allow the Jews to create a Jewish state while allocating 99.99% of the land in the ME that belonged to the Ottomans, to the Arab Muslims.

Arabs Muslims don't like it, and want it all? Tough shit.
 
Yup, hilarious...



The Croatians and Bosnians of the Independent State of Croatia did not need the Mufti to attack Serbs.

In terms of seeking German support to try to prevent the British sponsored Zionist invasion and colonization of Palestine, the Mufti was doing exactly what he should have been doing for the native inhabitants of Palestine.

We already have a thread dedicated to this where you tried to whitewash the genocidal Nazi maniac that the Mufti was, and your lies did not pay off as usual. Quit derailing this thread.


You are the ZioNazi maniac. The Mufti was doing the rational thing, he was seeking help from the Germans to prevent the Zionists from invading and colonizing Palestine. The Mufti killed no one.

You are the constant liar. You have never posted anything but propaganda.

How do you seek help by forming a Muslim army that killed Jews and Christians in EUROPE? How do you seek help by encouraging the Nazis and Arabs to "kill the Jews where you find them, this pleases Allah".

You are an IslamoNazi terrorist appeaser posing as a Christian spreading lies and propaganda.

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers


Because he did not form any army. That's a bunch of propaganda. The army of the Independent State of Croatia, which included Bosnian units, was formed in 1941 when the state was under Italian rule. The Arab army you are claiming he formed was formed by the Germans and 90% of the troops were from French North Africa, for obvious anti-colonial reasons. A tiny part were from the Middle East, much less Palestine.

The Mufti was completely justified in doing whatever necessary to try to prevent the colonization of Palestine and the on-going killing of Palestinians by the Zionists.

No actually the mufti did form an army that is a matter of historical fact and he was a central figure in the recruitment and morale of the army. Also a matter of historical fact.

Maybe an insane antisemite would think the mufti was "completely justified" in committing genocide on the Jews and Christians all over Europe and the Middle East, in his effort to Islamicize the entire Middle East. So it's no surprise that you also justify and idolize Islamic terrorists which are the bastard children of the marriage between the Nazis and the Mufi.
 


The Croatians and Bosnians of the Independent State of Croatia did not need the Mufti to attack Serbs.

In terms of seeking German support to try to prevent the British sponsored Zionist invasion and colonization of Palestine, the Mufti was doing exactly what he should have been doing for the native inhabitants of Palestine.

We already have a thread dedicated to this where you tried to whitewash the genocidal Nazi maniac that the Mufti was, and your lies did not pay off as usual. Quit derailing this thread.


You are the ZioNazi maniac. The Mufti was doing the rational thing, he was seeking help from the Germans to prevent the Zionists from invading and colonizing Palestine. The Mufti killed no one.

You are the constant liar. You have never posted anything but propaganda.

How do you seek help by forming a Muslim army that killed Jews and Christians in EUROPE? How do you seek help by encouraging the Nazis and Arabs to "kill the Jews where you find them, this pleases Allah".

You are an IslamoNazi terrorist appeaser posing as a Christian spreading lies and propaganda.

The mufti wasn't only about "Palestine" he was about the extermination of Jews and Christians from the Middle East.

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers

Four years later, al-Husseini threw his support to a pro-Nazi revolt in Iraq against the British-backed prime minister, Nuri Said Pasha. Going to Baghdad, al-Husseini issued a fatwa for a jihad against the British. Barely a month later, British troops ended the coup and occupied the country, whereupon al-Husseini fled to Iran. Although given sanctuary in the embassies of Japan and Italy, al-Husseini was again forced to be on the move when Iran was itself occupied by the British and Soviet armies. Al-Husseini made his way out of Iran with Italian diplomats who provided him with an Italian passport. He shaved his beard and dyed his hair to avoid being recognized by British agents and Iranian police.


He was about getting rid of the British occupiers of the Middle East.

If Zionists, with British support, had not been invading and colonizing Palestine with the intent to dispossess the native inhabitants, he would not have had any interest in Jews.

Of course he would issue a fatwa against the British occupiers, sheesh you are so damn brainwashed you can't think straight. He had nothing against native Middle Eastern Christians. Just Christian colonizer/occupiers. This may surprise you, but we are not wanted as occupiers by local people usually.

He did nothing of consequence in Europe. The Croatian/Bosnians killed Serbs and Jews entirely on their own. It's just a bunch of propaganda that tries to justify the Jewish invasion, colonization of Palestine and the dispossession of the native inhabitants by European Jews. It is so transparent.
 
people with the same ancestry don't have a right to live there because of different beliefs

so ancestry cant be basis for the claim

America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
Based on the fact that the land belonged to the Ottomans who joined the Germans in WWI and were defeated by the British who decided to allow the Jews to create a Jewish state while allocating 99.99% of the land in the ME that belonged to the Ottomans, to the Arab Muslims.

Arabs Muslims don't like it, and want it all? Tough shit.

To the victor goes the spoils.
 
people with the same ancestry don't have a right to live there because of different beliefs

so ancestry cant be basis for the claim

America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
Based on the fact that the land belonged to the Ottomans who joined the Germans in WWI and were defeated by the British who decided to allow the Jews to create a Jewish state while allocating 99.99% of the land in the ME that belonged to the Ottomans, to the Arab Muslims.

Arabs Muslims don't like it, and want it all? Tough shit.

Winston Churchill compared the Arabs wanting the Promised Land, in addition to the other 99% of the Middle East, to King Ahab wanting Naboth's little vineyard (the inheritance of his fathers).
 
America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
Based on the fact that the land belonged to the Ottomans who joined the Germans in WWI and were defeated by the British who decided to allow the Jews to create a Jewish state while allocating 99.99% of the land in the ME that belonged to the Ottomans, to the Arab Muslims.

Arabs Muslims don't like it, and want it all? Tough shit.

To the victor goes the spoils.

The British sponsored colonization and subsequent dispossession of the native Christians and Muslims of Palestine was illegal pursuant to article 22 of the Covenant of the League of nations. Jews will not be able to rule indefinitely over a growing majority of non-Jews and it would be best that the Jews consider whether they will see a South African or a Rhodesian solution. If I were an Israeli Jew, I would try to work a South African type solution.
 
Is that like the "Nazi Mufti" BS you throw out every 30 days in your Islamophobic, bigoted way?
I only bring the Nazi mufti up because you morons keep calling the Israelis Nazis, forgetting that Palestinians were real Nazis. And I will continue to do so, everytime I see someone accuse the victims of Nazis of being Nazis.

Really roodboy?

But it was you who started the thread about the Mufti AGAIN wasn't it? Palestinian Nazi Mufti who killed thousands of Christians

I guess it's just part of the zionut mantra you been taught!

Try finding a new drum to band that is factual dummy!
Again, the thread was in response to morons like you who called the Israelis Nazis, and then made the claim that the Mufti wasn't a Nazi who formed an army that killed Jews and Christians. So I formed a thread as opposed to derail the topic of the thread like you and Monte often do.

Just remember that the Palestinians are the bastard children of the marriage between Nazism and Arab Islamic nationalism.

You got brainwashed real good didn't you roodboy! :cuckoo:
Ask yourself.

I did... That's how I came up that conclusion dummy!
 
America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
Based on the fact that the land belonged to the Ottomans who joined the Germans in WWI and were defeated by the British who decided to allow the Jews to create a Jewish state while allocating 99.99% of the land in the ME that belonged to the Ottomans, to the Arab Muslims.

Arabs Muslims don't like it, and want it all? Tough shit.

Winston Churchill compared the Arabs wanting the Promised Land, in addition to the other 99% of the Middle East, to King Ahab wanting Naboth's little vineyard (the inheritance of his fathers).

The Muslims and Christians of Palestine wanted to keep their land. They did not want a bunch of Europeans stealing it from them. It's that simple.
 
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
Based on the fact that the land belonged to the Ottomans who joined the Germans in WWI and were defeated by the British who decided to allow the Jews to create a Jewish state while allocating 99.99% of the land in the ME that belonged to the Ottomans, to the Arab Muslims.

Arabs Muslims don't like it, and want it all? Tough shit.

Winston Churchill compared the Arabs wanting the Promised Land, in addition to the other 99% of the Middle East, to King Ahab wanting Naboth's little vineyard (the inheritance of his fathers).

The Muslims and Christians of Palestine wanted to keep their land. They did not want a bunch of Europeans stealing it from them. It's that simple.
Actually, it was the land stolen by the invading/ colonizing Egyptians, Syrians and Lebanese who dispossessed earlier settlers. The invading / colonizing Turks were pushed aside.
 
You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
Based on the fact that the land belonged to the Ottomans who joined the Germans in WWI and were defeated by the British who decided to allow the Jews to create a Jewish state while allocating 99.99% of the land in the ME that belonged to the Ottomans, to the Arab Muslims.

Arabs Muslims don't like it, and want it all? Tough shit.

Winston Churchill compared the Arabs wanting the Promised Land, in addition to the other 99% of the Middle East, to King Ahab wanting Naboth's little vineyard (the inheritance of his fathers).

The Muslims and Christians of Palestine wanted to keep their land. They did not want a bunch of Europeans stealing it from them. It's that simple.
Actually, it was the land stolen by the invading/ colonizing Egyptians, Syrians and Lebanese who dispossessed earlier settlers. The invading / colonizing Turks were pushed aside.

That's just illogical. How can "settlers" be the native inhabitants? How can the local inhabitants steal land from themselves? You are making a fool of yourself. LOL
 
Yup, hilarious...



The Croatians and Bosnians of the Independent State of Croatia did not need the Mufti to attack Serbs.

In terms of seeking German support to try to prevent the British sponsored Zionist invasion and colonization of Palestine, the Mufti was doing exactly what he should have been doing for the native inhabitants of Palestine.

We already have a thread dedicated to this where you tried to whitewash the genocidal Nazi maniac that the Mufti was, and your lies did not pay off as usual. Quit derailing this thread.


You are the ZioNazi maniac. The Mufti was doing the rational thing, he was seeking help from the Germans to prevent the Zionists from invading and colonizing Palestine. The Mufti killed no one.

You are the constant liar. You have never posted anything but propaganda.

How do you seek help by forming a Muslim army that killed Jews and Christians in EUROPE? How do you seek help by encouraging the Nazis and Arabs to "kill the Jews where you find them, this pleases Allah".

You are an IslamoNazi terrorist appeaser posing as a Christian spreading lies and propaganda.

The mufti wasn't only about "Palestine" he was about the extermination of Jews and Christians from the Middle East.

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers

Four years later, al-Husseini threw his support to a pro-Nazi revolt in Iraq against the British-backed prime minister, Nuri Said Pasha. Going to Baghdad, al-Husseini issued a fatwa for a jihad against the British. Barely a month later, British troops ended the coup and occupied the country, whereupon al-Husseini fled to Iran. Although given sanctuary in the embassies of Japan and Italy, al-Husseini was again forced to be on the move when Iran was itself occupied by the British and Soviet armies. Al-Husseini made his way out of Iran with Italian diplomats who provided him with an Italian passport. He shaved his beard and dyed his hair to avoid being recognized by British agents and Iranian police.


He was about getting rid of the British occupiers of the Middle East.

If Zionists, with British support, had not been invading and colonizing Palestine with the intent to dispossess the native inhabitants, he would not have had any interest in Jews.

Of course he would issue a fatwa against the British occupiers, sheesh you are so damn brainwashed you can't think straight. He had nothing against native Middle Eastern Christians. Just Christian colonizer/occupiers. This may surprise you, but we are not wanted as occupiers by local people usually.

He did nothing of consequence in Europe. The Croatian / Bosnians killed Serbs and Jews entirely on their own. It's just a bunch of propaganda that tries to justify the Jewish invasion, colonization of Palestine and the dispossession of the native inhabitants by European Jews. It is so transparent.

Hey keep lying it won't do you any good. The Mufti wanted to Islamicize ALL of the Middle East. He was more of a Nazi than even some of Hitler's main henchmen, formed an army which killed thousands of Jews and Christians. Which is why they were going to try him as a war criminal but he managed to escape, dressed a woman. His bastard offspring is still doing the same, killing Jews and Christians in the name of Mohammad, while hiding behind women. How ironic.
 
Yup, hilarious...



The Croatians and Bosnians of the Independent State of Croatia did not need the Mufti to attack Serbs.

In terms of seeking German support to try to prevent the British sponsored Zionist invasion and colonization of Palestine, the Mufti was doing exactly what he should have been doing for the native inhabitants of Palestine.

We already have a thread dedicated to this where you tried to whitewash the genocidal Nazi maniac that the Mufti was, and your lies did not pay off as usual. Quit derailing this thread.


You are the ZioNazi maniac. The Mufti was doing the rational thing, he was seeking help from the Germans to prevent the Zionists from invading and colonizing Palestine. The Mufti killed no one.

You are the constant liar. You have never posted anything but propaganda.

How do you seek help by forming a Muslim army that killed Jews and Christians in EUROPE? How do you seek help by encouraging the Nazis and Arabs to "kill the Jews where you find them, this pleases Allah".

You are an IslamoNazi terrorist appeaser posing as a Christian spreading lies and propaganda.

The mufti wasn't only about "Palestine" he was about the extermination of Jews and Christians from the Middle East.

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers

Four years later, al-Husseini threw his support to a pro-Nazi revolt in Iraq against the British-backed prime minister, Nuri Said Pasha. Going to Baghdad, al-Husseini issued a fatwa for a jihad against the British. Barely a month later, British troops ended the coup and occupied the country, whereupon al-Husseini fled to Iran. Although given sanctuary in the embassies of Japan and Italy, al-Husseini was again forced to be on the move when Iran was itself occupied by the British and Soviet armies. Al-Husseini made his way out of Iran with Italian diplomats who provided him with an Italian passport. He shaved his beard and dyed his hair to avoid being recognized by British agents and Iranian police.


He was about getting rid of the British occupiers of the Middle East.

If Zionists, with British support, had not been invading and colonizing Palestine with the intent to dispossess the native inhabitants, he would not have had any interest in Jews.

Of course he would issue a fatwa against the British occupiers, sheesh you are so damn brainwashed you can't think straight. He had nothing against native Middle Eastern Christians. Just Christian colonizer/occupiers. This may surprise you, but we are not wanted as occupiers by local people usually.

He did nothing of consequence in Europe. The Croatian/Bosnians killed Serbs and Jews entirely on their own. It's just a bunch of propaganda that tries to justify the Jewish invasion, colonization of Palestine and the dispossession of the native inhabitants by European Jews. It is so transparent.

He incited and was responsible for all Middle Eastern Muslim rulers to start committing genocide on the Jews, and the Christians knew they were next. He did the same in Europe, except in Europe he actually helped create this army who killed thousands of Jews and Christians. Somehow killing Jews in Iraq, Egypt, Syria, etc. and Europe had something to do with "Palestine". Ha ha ha. Or so says the rabid Jew hater.
 
America was founded by Puritans and other Christian sects who wanted religious liberty (from other Christian sects, I guess). Israel was founded by Jews for similar reasons. "Messianic Jews" and "Jews for Jesus" are code names for Christians and apostate Jews who harass and try to convert other Jews to their belief in the trinity. To have these missionaries in Israel would be an infringement of freedom of religion for Jews already living in Israel.
super. so any claim of an anceswtral right to the land of israel is bullshit.

You can take out the ancestral part of it and since Israel has always been the religious holy land of the Jews thousands of years before Chraitianity and Muslim, then Jews have every right to establish a state there.
lol. claiming land is holy doesn't give you a right to it.
You can even take out the religious, and the Jews still have a right to establish a a democratic state in a region where 99.99% of the land is Islamic Shariah shitholes of intolerance and violence.
based on what? what right?
Based on the fact that the land belonged to the Ottomans who joined the Germans in WWI and were defeated by the British who decided to allow the Jews to create a Jewish state while allocating 99.99% of the land in the ME that belonged to the Ottomans, to the Arab Muslims.

Arabs Muslims don't like it, and want it all? Tough shit.

To the victor goes the spoils.
Except when the victor isn't Arabs or Muslims. Then it's terrorizing, whining and lying for decades.
 
Back
Top Bottom