Neo-Confederate libertarians are not conservatives.

[thanatos144]

I get the feeling the OP is a fraud. Sounds too much like an average loony Obama butt sniffer. But hey, it is a Message Board. Waddayagunado?

I do not idolize politicians I'll leave that to people like you

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

I get the feeling the OP is a fraud. Sounds too much like an average loony Obama butt sniffer. But hey, it is a Message Board. Waddayagunado?

I do not idolize politicians I'll leave that to people like you

Except for "Father Abraham," obviously.

 

[thanatos144]

I get the feeling the OP is a fraud. Sounds too much like an average loony Obama butt sniffer. But hey, it is a Message Board. Waddayagunado?

I do not idolize politicians I'll leave that to people like you

Except for "Father Abraham," obviously.

Not buying into the bullshit lies of confederates does nor equal idolizing a person. Unlike you with the liar Ron Paul

 

[bendog]

Are you honestly saying being a slave is more desirable then being a ffee illegal alien? Because that's just ignorant

As a republican, I could not care less in the welfare of cheap labor. I merely note that illegals are cheaper than slaves for captialists. And I continue to resent the damn yankees cofiscation of personal property.

Sounds like impersonation of a republican to me. But each to their own.

Well, perhaps I'm a neo-cofederate libertarian. It's very confusing.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

I do not idolize politicians I'll leave that to people like you

Except for "Father Abraham," obviously.

Not buying into the bullshit lies of confederates does nor equal idolizing a person. Unlike you with the liar Ron Paul

I believe I criticized Ron Paul in this very thread. Can you link us to a single critique you've made of Abraham Lincoln?

 

[Sallow]

How was that? By fighting a war that the confederates started? Or by winning it?

Lincoln?

By revoking habeas corpus, arresting any reporters critical of his administration, using federal troop to block the Supreme Court from being seated, to start with...

Guess what.

The Constitution allowed him to do all that..and much more if he wanted.

 

[Sallow]

Really? Cons would have magically gave up their slaves in 1875?

How did you arrive at this conclusion?

Pssst, stupid; the South was ruled by demoKKKrats, like you.

You're welcome for the history lesson.

Conservative Democrats..

By the way..you don't see Liberals waving around confederate flags.

Those would be conservatives!

Sweet Home Alabama!

 

[Sallow]

Lincoln?

By revoking habeas corpus, arresting any reporters critical of his administration, using federal troop to block the Supreme Court from being seated, to start with...

And the confederates killed men and women for attempting to leave the south

Oh, sure. That's why Sherman said this:

“We're not only fighting hostile armies, but a hostile people,” Sherman explained; as a result, they needed to “make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war.”

By marching through Georgia terroizing the citizens in an attempt to abandon the confederare cause. Burning houses, stealing live stock and produce along the way. Because the North had such a morally correct stance.

He didn't do enough.

Not by a long shot.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Guess what.

The Constitution allowed him to do all that..and much more if he wanted.

Lincoln was under the United States Constitution, not your beloved Khmer Rouge.

His blockade of the Supreme Court was treason. The arrest of reporters a gross violation of the first amendment.

Lincoln was a scumbag - no doubt you admire him.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Conservative Democrats..

Really?

So they were advocating low taxes and smaller government?

ROFL

The lies you leftists tell...

 

[TakeAStepBack]

How was that? By fighting a war that the confederates started? Or by winning it?

Lincoln?

By revoking habeas corpus, arresting any reporters critical of his administration, using federal troop to block the Supreme Court from being seated, to start with...

Guess what.

The Constitution allowed him to do all that..and much more if he wanted.

No it didn't, you moron.

Not that its surprising to see you peddling bullshit. it's your MO.

 

[Uncensored2008]

He didn't do enough.

Not by a long shot.

Murder and terror are always a favorite of you Khmer Rouge types...

Your greatest dream is that one day you'll be able to participate in the mass murder of millions of your fellow Americans. It is the constant dream of the left.

 

[Sallow]

Guess what.

The Constitution allowed him to do all that..and much more if he wanted.

Lincoln was under the United States Constitution, not your beloved Khmer Rouge.

His blockade of the Supreme Court was treason. The arrest of reporters a gross violation of the first amendment.

Lincoln was a scumbag - no doubt you admire him.

I absolutely admire him.

He was a great leader and saved the Union.

And he was well within his Constitutional Powers to do what he did.

My only criticism of him is reconstruction of the South.

That should not have happened. Not the way it did.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

YOu just can not fix stupid. Case in point - Shallow.

 

[Sallow]

He didn't do enough.

Not by a long shot.

Murder and terror are always a favorite of you Khmer Rouge types...

Your greatest dream is that one day you'll be able to participate in the mass murder of millions of your fellow Americans. It is the constant dream of the left.

Confederates were not Americans.

They were treasonous and traitorous slaving scumbags.

They deserved far worse then they got.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Only those who bow to the federal government are true americans.

Lincoln arrested journalists by executive order, not the constitution. Dipshit.


Nothing would please me more than to watch a useful idiot like you be expended when you're no longer useful. That would be a great treat, Shallow.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I absolutely admire him.

Of course.

But then, you admire Pol Pot, Mao, Uncle Joe Stalin, and Ho Chi Minh....

He was a great leader and saved the Union.

And he was well within his Constitutional Powers to do what he did.

Bummer you never took even a basic civics class.

My only criticism of him is reconstruction of the South.

That should not have happened. Not the way it did.

He should have murdered every man, woman, and child, like your hero Pol Pot, right?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

He didn't do enough.

Not by a long shot.

Murder and terror are always a favorite of you Khmer Rouge types...

Your greatest dream is that one day you'll be able to participate in the mass murder of millions of your fellow Americans. It is the constant dream of the left.

Confederates were not Americans.

They were treasonous and traitorous slaving scumbags.

They deserved far worse then they got.

Secession is a long held belief in the American paradigm. This wasn't the first time states tried it. It shouldn't bring war either. But Shallow loves war and murdering americans for the cause of consolidated power. It gets the leg tingling.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Confederates were not Americans.

I see,

I take it Arizonans aren't Americans either, right Comrade?

If you could murder the 15 million people in Arizona today, would you hesitate a microsecond, or only a nanosecond?

They were treasonous and traitorous slaving scumbags.

They deserved far worse then they got.

As do those who fail to take a loyalty oath to Dear Leader!

If any should wonder how the holocaust, the purges, and the killing fields happened; I present Shallow.

 

[Sallow]

Murder and terror are always a favorite of you Khmer Rouge types...

Your greatest dream is that one day you'll be able to participate in the mass murder of millions of your fellow Americans. It is the constant dream of the left.

Confederates were not Americans.

They were treasonous and traitorous slaving scumbags.

They deserved far worse then they got.

Secession is a long held belief in the American paradigm. This wasn't the first time states tried it. It shouldn't bring war either. But Shallow loves war and murdering americans for the cause of consolidated power. It gets the leg tingling.

Yeah..of course you post that bullshit because NOTHING in the Constitution ALLOWS secession. In FACT the Constitution STRICTLY forbids it.

Insurrection, repelling invasions and punishing offenses against the laws of nations (such as piracy) are the very things the government can use military force against as advocated by the Constitution.

And the South was involved in insurrection.

Pick up a history book.