NC has responded to the Feds

Hah....I see the fag bathroom issue for what it is. You on the other hand....
Really? Gays in restrooms are as old as public restrooms.
You only see what you wish to see not the reality.

Wow!! Talk about irony.
You just described every transgender that takes a peek at their own equipment.
False! Enjoy your wilful ignorance.

Keep living in your progressive bubble.
Can't hear you with that ignorance in your mouth.

What about the dick thats choking your voice?
 
Hah....I see the fag bathroom issue for what it is. You on the other hand....
Really? Gays in restrooms are as old as public restrooms.
You only see what you wish to see not the reality.

Wow!! Talk about irony.
You just described every transgender that takes a peek at their own equipment.
False! Enjoy your wilful ignorance.

Keep living in your progressive bubble.
Can't hear you with that ignorance in your mouth.

You talk fairly well with Obama's dick in yours though.

That's talent.
 
It's quite clear that the NC Gov. McCrory and his band of ignorant malcontents simply want to stir up a pile of shit. They haven't a leg to stand on given that stupid legislation they passed, SB 2, clearly is in violation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

That State legislation would apply to ALL schools, colleges and universities receiving any Federal funding as it stands. If NC doesn't comply with Title IX of the CRA then those dumb bastards thumbing their nose at the National Government deserve to take it in the shorts for their stupidity. Any court action that idiot governor and his would take is a sure fail. US law reigns supreme over conflicting State law says the US Constitution at Article VI, Clause 2!

Bottom line is McCrory and his gang of idiot malcontents will only be hurting the people of NC who will have to pick up the final tab for this Tom Foolery and grand standing!
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Since they are transgender their sex has been redesignated.
Your assumption is based on appearance not on functionality.

Lopping off your dick doesnt make you a chick....it makes you a dickless dude.
Not by itself but the hormone therapy does.
Fail.

Sorry,still a dickless dude.....with mental issues.
 
It's quite clear that the NC Gov. McCrory and his band of ignorant malcontents simply want to stir up a pile of shit. They haven't a leg to stand on given that stupid legislation they passed, SB 2, clearly is in violation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

That State legislation would apply to ALL schools, colleges and universities receiving any Federal funding as it stands. If NC doesn't comply with Title IX of the CRA then those dumb bastards thumbing their nose at the National Government deserve to take it in the shorts for their stupidity. Any court action that idiot governor and his would take is a sure fail. US law reigns supreme over conflicting State law says the US Constitution at Article VI, Clause 2!

Bottom line is McCrory and his gang of idiot malcontents will only be hurting the people of NC who will have to pick up the final tab for this Tom Foolery and grand standing!
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Since they are transgender their sex has been redesignated.
Your assumption is based on appearance not on functionality.

Lopping off your dick doesnt make you a chick....it makes you a dickless dude.
Not by itself but the hormone therapy does.
Fail.

One can voluntarily make ones life harder. It's completely constitutional.
 
They must love the lawyers as much as they hate the transgendered?
 
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Probably something to do with the fact that the wording in the legislation in question is so vague as to provide a valid legal argument for a nymphomaniac to claim "discrimination" because she's been barred from having sex on the classroom floor.
Title IX was about segregationist judges. These people are fuckin retarded.

The relevant law appears to be:
Title IX of 1972 Educational Amendments (not either CRA 64 or 68)

"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

and any objective reading of it will reveal that it is excessively vague as to both the definition of "sex" and "discrimination".

Of course I'm no lawyer (Thank God) so perhaps there is some relevancy or connection that I'm not seeing.

:popcorn:
 
Another incredibly insulting and divisive wedge "solution" to a nonexistent problem. Don't worry about the GOP wrecking the nonrich and the country and their idiotic foreign policy etc etc etc....
so you are saying people ARE using the proper sex designated bathrooms?
 
Hah....I see the fag bathroom issue for what it is. You on the other hand....
Really? Gays in restrooms are as old as public restrooms.
You only see what you wish to see not the reality.

Wow!! Talk about irony.
You just described every transgender that takes a peek at their own equipment.
False! Enjoy your wilful ignorance.

Keep living in your progressive bubble.
Can't hear you with that ignorance in your mouth.

Link to where anyone thinks that's funny?
 
It's quite clear that the NC Gov. McCrory and his band of ignorant malcontents simply want to stir up a pile of shit. They haven't a leg to stand on given that stupid legislation they passed, SB 2, clearly is in violation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

That State legislation would apply to ALL schools, colleges and universities receiving any Federal funding as it stands. If NC doesn't comply with Title IX of the CRA then those dumb bastards thumbing their nose at the National Government deserve to take it in the shorts for their stupidity. Any court action that idiot governor and his would take is a sure fail. US law reigns supreme over conflicting State law says the US Constitution at Article VI, Clause 2!

Bottom line is McCrory and his gang of idiot malcontents will only be hurting the people of NC who will have to pick up the final tab for this Tom Foolery and grand standing!
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Since they are transgender their sex has been redesignated.
Your assumption is based on appearance not on functionality.
no it doesn't. We cant change sex dumbfuck.
Funny, we already have
Besides sex and gender are two different things.

What is the difference between sex and gender?
Who's the dumbfuck again?
retarded-boy.gif
Too many multisyllabic words in the link?
Your prom picture is no answer.
 
It's quite clear that the NC Gov. McCrory and his band of ignorant malcontents simply want to stir up a pile of shit. They haven't a leg to stand on given that stupid legislation they passed, SB 2, clearly is in violation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

That State legislation would apply to ALL schools, colleges and universities receiving any Federal funding as it stands. If NC doesn't comply with Title IX of the CRA then those dumb bastards thumbing their nose at the National Government deserve to take it in the shorts for their stupidity. Any court action that idiot governor and his would take is a sure fail. US law reigns supreme over conflicting State law says the US Constitution at Article VI, Clause 2!

Bottom line is McCrory and his gang of idiot malcontents will only be hurting the people of NC who will have to pick up the final tab for this Tom Foolery and grand standing!
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Since they are transgender their sex has been redesignated.
Your assumption is based on appearance not on functionality.

Lopping off your dick doesnt make you a chick....it makes you a dickless dude.
Not by itself but the hormone therapy does.
Fail.

Sorry,still a dickless dude.....with mental issues.
What's the gender of a baby we removed the penis from and raised as a girl?
 
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Since they are transgender their sex has been redesignated.
Your assumption is based on appearance not on functionality.

Lopping off your dick doesnt make you a chick....it makes you a dickless dude.
Not by itself but the hormone therapy does.
Fail.

Sorry,still a dickless dude.....with mental issues.
What's the gender of a baby we removed the penis from and raised as a girl?

A dude without a dick.
 
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Since they are transgender their sex has been redesignated.
Your assumption is based on appearance not on functionality.

Lopping off your dick doesnt make you a chick....it makes you a dickless dude.
Not by itself but the hormone therapy does.
Fail.

Sorry,still a dickless dude.....with mental issues.
What's the gender of a baby we removed the penis from and raised as a girl?

Oh...and you should be put in prison for doing so.
 
Sorry,still a dickless dude.....with mental issues.


so what? that citizen deserves a safe place to go to the bathroom in public.

the burden is now on the hysterical governor to demonstrate the compelling state interest in denying that.
 
It's quite clear that the NC Gov. McCrory and his band of ignorant malcontents simply want to stir up a pile of shit. They haven't a leg to stand on given that stupid legislation they passed, SB 2, clearly is in violation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act.

That State legislation would apply to ALL schools, colleges and universities receiving any Federal funding as it stands. If NC doesn't comply with Title IX of the CRA then those dumb bastards thumbing their nose at the National Government deserve to take it in the shorts for their stupidity. Any court action that idiot governor and his would take is a sure fail. US law reigns supreme over conflicting State law says the US Constitution at Article VI, Clause 2!

Bottom line is McCrory and his gang of idiot malcontents will only be hurting the people of NC who will have to pick up the final tab for this Tom Foolery and grand standing!
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Since they are transgender their sex has been redesignated.
Your assumption is based on appearance not on functionality.

HUH?

Bruce Jenner didn't "function" as a Man most of his life?
Another classic pop false comparison.

How so dipshit?
What he was then has no bering on what she is now.
That's how.
 
How is telling someone to use their sex designated bathroom against the CRA?
Probably something to do with the fact that the wording in the legislation in question is so vague as to provide a valid legal argument for a nymphomaniac to claim "discrimination" because she's been barred from having sex on the classroom floor.
Title IX was about segregationist judges. These people are fuckin retarded.

The relevant law appears to be:
Title IX of 1972 Educational Amendments (not either CRA 64 or 68)

"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

and any objective reading of it will reveal that it is excessively vague as to both the definition of "sex" and "discrimination".

Of course I'm no lawyer (Thank God) so perhaps there is some relevancy or connection that I'm not seeing.

:popcorn:
Yes, the Educational Amendments. These people don't even know what they are using SMH.
They even had to take it to SC in the late 80s. They ruled it only applied to federally financed
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
:dunno:
 
There still is no reasonable way to enforce this law without demanding someone show their genitals and therefore violating their privacy.
 
Back
Top Bottom