NC has responded to the Feds

[Pop23]

Call us when a man has a period.

Don't worry. It won't be long before someone invents an aortic valve implant that opens every 28 days for 72 hours at a time.

Will they then implant something that allows the tranny to expel a bowling ball out of his surgically altered dick nine months after the valve fails?

If it were possible to make tranny males get pregnant and have to give birth, there would be zero tranny males.

did you know that tranny males have to use some special kind of lube to keep their cut up dick from closing up? The body treats it like a wound.

I heard that. The human body often reacts to make itself whole when dumbasses screw with it.

 

[Pop23]

imagine sticking your dick in a dick
If a male has sex with a tranny male, does that make him gay?

Yes, by default.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

North Carolina sues U.S. Justice Department over “bathroom bill”
North Carolina has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Justice Department to defend House Bill 2, a law that bans individuals from using public bathrooms that do not correspond with their biological sex, according to a court document. The move is in response to a letter the Justice Department sent last week warning Gov. Pat McCrory that the law was in violation of the Civil Rights Act and giving him until Monday to “remedy the situation.”

Where exactly does the civil rights legialation, passed by Congress, says that it applies specifically to this case? This is really nothing more that an effort to push others into accepting a certain "ideological view", than it is a case of a violation of law. It's really no different than when the liberals complain about legialation that they say, interferes with and inhibits their abortion views, by pushing a belief that is deemed contrary to theirs. So, as a result, they likewise use government power, trying to site some form of legislation, to force an acceptance of "their" ideological view.

 

[Silhouette]

imagine sticking your dick in a dick
If a male has sex with a tranny male, does that make him gay?

Yes, by default.

Family Guy had something to say about that:

 

[Ravi]

an attempt to
understand.

Understanding is overrated. That's what we have politics for.

In any event, I think this is a good time to re-assert my hypothesis about what which is called transgenderism.

The concept of transgenderism is built upon the notion that men and women have different human identities. It requires a belief that there are fundamental differences between men and women that to beyond superficial accident of their birth. There is, of course, no doubt that there are superficial differences between women, having to do with the dimorphic construction of their bodies. And there can be no doubt that there are an assortment of differences between the two classes, and commonalities within each respective class, that would seem to go beyond the mere accident of birth. But none of that amounts to anything that rightly indicates or implies any non-superficial difference between men and women.

Ultimately, the search for non-superficial differences between men and women continues to be a complete failure. Every attempt to identify such differences always turns out to be pure sexism, and often times is quite homophobic. And the notions which people express as their reasons for "feeling like the wrong gender" are similarly so. These all range from notions masculine strength vs feminine gentleness, sexist beliefs in gender specific interests, sexist conceptions of different academic capacities, etc.

What it all comes down to is that society as a whole is diseased with sexism. Society insists that a man who wants to be a Kindergarten teacher must be a fag because being nice and gentle toward young children isn't manly, it's feminine. Or worse, he's a pedophile and that's why he wants to work with children. Women who want to be police are butch and manly. Men who are sensitive are lesser humans than men who are rough and tough. Women who are rough and tough are lesser humans than women who are delicate and ornate. All this bullshit sexism that has diseased society is what generates the feeling within people that they are faulty because of who they are not matching what they think society is saying they should be.

These feelings are, thus, not due to some kind of mistake of nature to create the person with the "wrong" anatomy. They are due to mistakes by society, and mistakes by the individual, to that define the quality of human existence against concepts of preconceived notions that assign identifying qualities based on gender.

For this reason, I maintain that the growth needed in society is not double down on sexism by reaffirming the false beliefs that men and women have qualities that they allegedly are supposed to maintain. Instead, we need to break away from these ideas. We need to learn to accept people's character without regard to whether that character is housed in a male or female body. If we as a society learn to do that, transgenderism will disappear and become a page in humanity's history of sexism. By indulging the hypothesis of an internal mental gender identification separate from biological identification of the same, we are embracing and propagating sexism.

Interesting. I will have to think about this. Though if you want to be feminine or masculine who is to say one is superior to the other. Kind of reminds me of people who are afraid to describe someone as black. It's all superficial.

 

[Ravi]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

 

[TNHarley]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

 

[daws101]

refuting your bullshit ,,,

Well then, you might want to try something that isn't so 100% consistent with my "bullshit."

You know, I'm a little disappointed. You're one of the more level headed people around here. I would think you would respect me enough to distinguish between my bullshit that I feed the morons, and times when you and I have an honest difference of opinion.

Don't get me wrong, if you like pie, you know I can serve it up. I just thought of you as more of a chicken and rice type.

my disagreement with you is an honest one.
your" bullshit"is no refutation of an actual science and to call it a pseudo science puts it in the same league as phrenolgy pyramid power crystal power etc,

No, but I think you need to reevaluate your assumptions and biases. Calling psychology pseudoscience does not mean that I reject its value as an academic field of study. There are many legitimate fields of study which are not science. The over use of the word "science" cheapens scientific knowledge, and has led to all kinds of wild ass ideas. Creationism "science," for example.

Declaring that a Man is "functioning" as a woman is beyond the scope of science, it is impossible. To function as a woman, you would have to have the EXPERIENSES that a woman has.

Call us when a man has a period.

So men andwomen can't experience the same things.
The menstrual cycle is a more or less automatic function.

 

[daws101]

Do you also think depression is just a subjective feeling?

Before bothering to venture down that road, I suggest that you shift your assumptions about me.

I have no assumptions about you other than you seem too rational to be a Republican.

Do you think depression is just a subjective feeling? I always wonder why "conservatives" think feelings are so unimportant. We wouldn't be human without them.

There are many types of conservatives. Unfortunately, the most common type in recent times is the batshit crazy fake conservative.

I always wonder why liberals think feelings are so supremely important. We wouldn't be human if we couldn't put them to the back burner.

Putting them on the back burner is also a feeling.

 

[daws101]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

Bahahahaha this coming from one of least free posters on the board.

 

[daws101]

and they are suing the Justice Dept.
Waiting for a link
It is breaking on reuters

It will be tossed out for lack of standing.

elaborate

When you do.

That's weak, dude. You explaining yourself was not contingent on him making a case. Makes me believe you're not a serious poster.

Your opinion is meaningless.

 

[Ravi]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

 

[TNHarley]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

Idk.. Going by history, forced conformity and totalitarianism didn't do too many any damn good.

 

[Ravi]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

Idk.. Going by history, forced conformity and totalitarianism didn't do too many any damn good.

You've never been a mom, lol.

But you are agitating for gender conformity. How totalitarian.

 

[daws101]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

Idk.. Going by history, forced conformity and totalitarianism didn't do too many any damn good.

Then why are you trying so hard to repeat it?

 

[TNHarley]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

Idk.. Going by history, forced conformity and totalitarianism didn't do too many any damn good.

You've never been a mom, lol.

But you are agitating for gender conformity. How totalitarian.

Well no lol
How am I doing that?

 

[daws101]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

Idk.. Going by history, forced conformity and totalitarianism didn't do too many any damn good.

You've never been a mom, lol.

But you are agitating for gender conformity. How totalitarian.

Not to state the obvious but he's not the brightest of bulbs.

 

[Ravi]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

Idk.. Going by history, forced conformity and totalitarianism didn't do too many any damn good.

You've never been a mom, lol.

But you are agitating for gender conformity. How totalitarian.

Well no lol
How am I doing that?

By deciding how others are allowed to identify.

 

[daws101]

Yeah, and feelings matter. If they didn't we'd still be part of the British empire.

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

Idk.. Going by history, forced conformity and totalitarianism didn't do too many any damn good.

You've never been a mom, lol.

But you are agitating for gender conformity. How totalitarian.

Well no lol
How am I doing that?

Don't read your own shit?
It's crystal clear from what you spew that's exactly what you are doing.

 

[TNHarley]

So you think freedom is just a feeling and not a necessity?

It can be both. But if you don't feel you need to be free what would be the point of it?

Idk.. Going by history, forced conformity and totalitarianism didn't do too many any damn good.

You've never been a mom, lol.

But you are agitating for gender conformity. How totalitarian.

Well no lol
How am I doing that?

By deciding how others are allowed to identify.

I don't care what they identify as. It's one of my business. I feel like you're developing a straw man simply because I believe in basic human decency, consideration and other people.
I have no problem with the mentally ill. But don't expect conformity and special rights.
My main problem is how society handles transsexuals