NATO is lacking: Ya' think?

[GLASNOST]

They have been involved in the fight since day one.

But numbnuts doesn't know that. He only reads the headlines of the MSM.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Lol this dumb motherfucker thinks NATO has failed when they haven't even entered the fight

Right. It's propaganda for apparently very ignorant people.

For example, Putin knows what would have happened, had NATO caught his attempted (and failed) tank blitz to Kyiv. Single file as they were.

No doubt someone from NATO (probably an American) told his team, "Ya know, we would have turned that entire column into dust, if we had felt like it."

That's why Putin has to make offensive nuclear threats.

 

[Kondor3]

If the Kremlin ever puts you in its cross-hairs, Billly Bob, you will be shat out of your own ass. Your butthole is already feeling the leakage ...

Any time, Vlad... any time at all... make your move, Loser... if you can get past the B-Team Ukrainians, that is...

 

[GLASNOST]

Any time, Vlad...

My name's not Vlad but if you insist I'd rather you call me Mr. Vlad.

 

[Deadstick]

Right. It's propaganda for apparently very ignorant people.

For example, Putin knows what would have happened, had NATO caught his attempted (and failed) tank blitz to Kyiv. Single file as they were.

No doubt someone from NATO (probably an American) told his team, "Ya know, we would have turned that entire column into dust, if we had felt like it."

That's why Putin has to make offensive nuclear threats.

Would have could have but didn't.

 

[Deadstick]

NATO is nothing but a money grubbing scam like Global Warming phonies or the UN or the WHO, so many so costly so useless so wasteful so criminal it’s mind boggling.

Correct but many of the ignorant herd are just too thick to get it, there is no cure for that level of stupid, Smedley Butler made it clear well over 80 years ago with his War is a racket speech, if they don't get it after all that time they never will, one would have thought after Vietnam they would have.

 

[rightwinger]

I always thought so but not any longer. Anyway, I think it should be dismantled altogether so if the report is true then that's really fine with me.

Who is stronger than NATO

 

[Ringo]

Either way... you're not one of "US"... so... phukk off...

Daily Mail:
None of Britain's six wartime submarines are on active duty at sea. The state of Britain's Navy is so deplorable that they cannot afford it.

 

[GLASNOST]

Who is stronger than NATO

NATO is not a country.

 

[GLASNOST]

Either way... you're not one of "US"... so... phukk off...

Check the forum member requriements, you tosser.

 

[rightwinger]

NATO is not a country.

So?

 

[Deadstick]

NATO is not a country.

NATO is a criminal gang and foreign Legion for the US Reich it's as simple as that, no need for further discussion.

 

[gipper]

Correct but many of the ignorant herd are just too thick to get it, there is no cure for that level of stupid, Smedley Butler made it clear well over 80 years ago with his War is a racket speech, if they don't get it after all that time they never will, one would have thought after Vietnam they would have.

Americans used to know war is a racket, but you have to go back to before WWII. Nonintervention was taught in public schools decades ago. My parents could recite from memory much of Washington’s farewell address in their 50s.

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.

Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people under an efficient government, the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel.

Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice?

It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them. . . .


They had experienced the absurdity of WWI and wanted nothing to do with war. That was easily flipped when FDR provoked Japan and set up events for Pearl Harbor.

Now after decades of war and massive war spending and enormous propaganda pushing the greatness of US imperialism, Americans have become a warrior nation.

Smedley Butler wrote the book…

 

[CrusaderFrank]

NATO is nothing but a money grubbing scam like Global Warming phonies or the UN or the WHO, so many so costly so useless so wasteful so criminal it’s mind boggling.

Provide the common defense morphed into the MIC thrives on obscene profits from unnecessary wars

 

[ESay]

Who is stronger than NATO

The Taliban, obviously.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

They have sent weapons intel mercenaries and the Ukrainian clowns are doing most of the dying for NATO, NATO just don't have the balls to put people on the ground in the open and fight like men they hide behind Ukrainians.

And just doing that little bit has stopped Russia cold.

Now, just imagine if a million troops from NATO got involved in the fight, when Russia cannot even deal with the tiny number in Ukraine.

 

[Ringo]

There are two wars going on:
1. Physical war of the USA against Russia to the last ukrainian.
2. economic war of the USA against Russia to the last european.

 

[rightwinger]

There are two wars going on:
1. Physical war of the USA against Russia to the last ukrainian.
2. economic war of the USA against Russia to the last european.

Russia is not in our league in either

 

[Deadstick]

And just doing that little bit has stopped Russia cold.

Now, just imagine if a million troops from NATO got involved in the fight, when Russia cannot even deal with the tiny number in Ukraine.

They have not been stopped and where are these million NATO troops coming from? Hitler had over two million and they were shredded but you would like another go, good luck with that.

 

[Deadstick]

The Taliban, obviously.