Nashville protestors , protest officer delkes sentence

horselightning

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2013
12,455
6,913
1,928

protest because officer Delke did not get sentence they wanted three years ago for shooting an armed black man.



here is what the officer delke and daniel hambrik case we got armed black dude running from a cop and ingnoring cop commands. the cop got 39 month in a plea deal and the protestors are not happy.

do yo think the shooting was justified? I mena the dude was running arme nad could have turned and shot the cop at any minute.
 
Shoot these peple must need something to do if they are protesting now for something happend three years ago. get hold of the couis saying he was not a threat. a man running with a loaded giun is a threat.
 

protest because officer Delke did not get sentence they wanted three years ago for shooting an armed black man.



here is what the officer delke and daniel hambrik case we got armed black dude running from a cop and ingnoring cop commands. the cop got 39 month in a plea deal and the protestors are not happy.

do yo think the shooting was justified? I mena the dude was running arme nad could have turned and shot the cop at any minute.


It is illegal for a cop to shoot a fleeing suspect in the back. Whether he is armed or not.
 

protest because officer Delke did not get sentence they wanted three years ago for shooting an armed black man.



here is what the officer delke and daniel hambrik case we got armed black dude running from a cop and ingnoring cop commands. the cop got 39 month in a plea deal and the protestors are not happy.

do yo think the shooting was justified? I mena the dude was running arme nad could have turned and shot the cop at any minute.


It is illegal for a cop to shoot a fleeing suspect in the back. Whether he is armed or not.

what if he turns around and shoots the cop.
 

protest because officer Delke did not get sentence they wanted three years ago for shooting an armed black man.



here is what the officer delke and daniel hambrik case we got armed black dude running from a cop and ingnoring cop commands. the cop got 39 month in a plea deal and the protestors are not happy.

do yo think the shooting was justified? I mena the dude was running arme nad could have turned and shot the cop at any minute.


It is illegal for a cop to shoot a fleeing suspect in the back. Whether he is armed or not.

what if he turns around and shoots the cop.

Under U.S. law the fleeing felon rule was limited in 1985 to non-lethal force in most cases by Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1. The justices held that deadly force "may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others."[2]

A police officer may not seize an unarmed, nondangerous suspect by shooting him dead...however...Where the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force.
— Justice Byron White, Tennessee v. Garner[3]
 

Forum List

Back
Top