Nancy Pelosi Trying To Hide Jan 6th Evidence

[rightwinger]

But, under FOIA, it's not a polite request. It's a legal demand for information.

Pelosi needs to demonstrate, beyond any question, that this so-called "sovereign immunity" is an actual thing. Frankly, I've never heard of such a thing...

I am sure Pelosi is well aware of what she must legally provide and what she doesn’t have to

She is an expert on procedure

 

[Couchpotato]

I am sure Pelosi is well aware of what she must legally provide and what she doesn’t have to

She is an expert on procedure

Sovereign Immunity is about the Government only being sued if it allows itself to be sued. It has nothing to do with a government employee (which is what Pelosi is) being able to refuse to give information over to a legal FOIA request.

Sovereign immunity

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Wrong, a journalist has a degree beyond high school;

they don't even need a high school diploma to be called "journalist"

they have principles.

and assistant principles just in case

Tabloids haven't taken forth a code of ethics which is an oath of real journalists.

yeah ok, that would mean the only difference between the two is that a tabloid journalist is the one that never violates his code of ethics...all one needs to call himself a journalist is to say he is one, a tenuous grasp of semantics and a socially educated population that doesn't know any better.

 

[sparky]

Applies to anyone who is accused

that was not my Q, and you know it RW'r
~S~

 

[sparky]

This comes down to one simplicity

we either have clarity and transparency in our government

or we've anarchy

~S~

 

[Frankeneinstein]

they have principles.

Yeah, more like "vice" principles

 

[Rye Catcher]

Yeah, more like "vice" principles

Typical of you and others like you. You didn't post my entire quote, to wit:

"Wrong, a journalist has a degree beyond high school; they have principles. Tabloids haven't taken forth a code of ethics which is an oath of real journalists."

People like you are dishonest.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Typical of you and others like you. You didn't post my entire quote, to wit:

That, as much as anything else, is the mark of a journalistic birthright...
... and in keeping with what today laughably passes as journalistic "integrity" I wasn't dealing with the entire quote, just the most blatant and obvious of your mistakes.

"Wrong, a journalist has a degree beyond high school;

Peter Jennings who set the standard of the day for journalism was a high school dropout, he anchored the ABC news desk for over 20 years from the early 80's to circa 05 and shared the desk for several years prior to that...
...he was the best of the day,[for whatever that's worth] in fact, only Cronkite and Murrow should be mentioned in the same breath with him.

they have principles.

they have nothing of the sort, nor is it a requirement that they do, never once in the late 20th century history of American journalism has principle gotten in the way of a journalist...
all they have is semantics that allow the socially educated to believe everything the media feeds them.

Tabloids haven't taken forth a code of ethics which is an oath of real journalists."

is Rachel Maddow a journalist?

People like you are dishonest.

In the industry that is simply referred to as, "journalistic license"...see how that works?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Gateway pundit the federalist

lol

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Nancy Pelosi Trying To Hide Jan 6th Evidence

This is a lie – more dishonesty from the reprehensible right, more lies from rightwing fake news sites.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Ah.....so two wrongs make a right, correct?

FYI, if it's illegal for Trump to do it, it's illegal for Pelosi to do it.

You’re a liar, as are most on the right.

Worse, you’re trying to deflect from the treason, crimes, and acts of domestic terrorism by conservatives.

 

[Rye Catcher]

That, as much as anything else, is the mark of a journalistic birthright...
... and in keeping with what today laughably passes as journalistic "integrity" I wasn't dealing with the entire quote, just the most blatant and obvious of your mistakes.

Peter Jennings who set the standard of the day for journalism was a high school dropout, he anchored the ABC news desk for over 20 years from the early 80's to circa 05 and shared the desk for several years prior to that...
...he was the best of the day,[for whatever that's worth] in fact, only Cronkite and Murrow should be mentioned in the same breath with him.


they have nothing of the sort, nor is it a requirement that they do, never once in the late 20th century history of American journalism has principle gotten in the way of a journalist...
all they have is semantics that allow the socially educated to believe everything the media feeds them.

is Rachel Maddow a journalist?

In the industry that is simply referred to as, "journalistic license"...see how that works?

You're full of shit.

JOUR 400. Media Law and Ethics (3)

 

[mudwhistle]

Both McCarthy and McConnell refused to cooperate

Now they demand full cooperation from Pelosi

If what you're doing is fraud what law says you have to agree with it?
They were doctoring evidence.
They were cherry-picking evidence to paint a dishonest picture of what took place on Jan 6th.
They set out to with an agenda and sought evidence that they think proves their hypothesis and purposely ignored any evidence that proved Trump's innocence.

Who in their right mind cooperates with that nonsense?

Pelosi has no right whatsoever to withhold any evidence. That's obstruction of congress.....and if it goes to trial it will be obstruction of justice.

 

[mudwhistle]

You’re a liar, as are most on the right.

Worse, you’re trying to deflect from the treason, crimes, and acts of domestic terrorism by conservatives.

You're going to have to be more specific on who committed these acts.

Judging from your previous posts....being a moderate or a conservative is a crime in itself.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Wrong, a journalist has a degree beyond high school; they have principles. Tabloids haven't taken forth a code of ethics which is an oath of real journalists.

What is a "real" journalist?

How would someone be able to identify him or herself as a "real" journalist?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You're full of shit.JOUR 400. Media Law and Ethics (3)

lol...this is obviously your way of trying to save face with others who may not read this because here is what your link says in full:

Prerequisite: Upper division standing required. Not available for students with credit in JOUR 390. Examination of laws and ethics that provide the liberties, rights and responsibilities of the media and others in the digital era. Available for graduate credit.

Fall-2022 - Schedule of Classes​

JOUR 400​

Class Number	Location	Day	Time
10093	MZ361	Mo	4:00pm-6:45pm
10094	MZ101	TuTh	11:00am-12:15pm

Spring-2023 - Schedule of Classes​

JOUR 400​

Class Number	Location	Day	Time
10533	ONLINE	MoWe	9:30am-10:45am
10534	MZ101	Th	4:00pm-6:45pm

Your using media style ethics and honesty to make your case, i.e. trying to fool us with a nothing burger

At best this is just a list of classes that would explain how to word [get around] legalities and ethical guidelines in general...
...everyone reading this should click the link to see what it is he claims is proof the media is ethical, and then you decide that proves it.
btw, priests, police officers, politicians and teachers really do have a code of ethics, what does that say to you?
Our media is one of the least trustworthy institutions in the country

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You're full of shit.
JOUR 400. Media Law and Ethics (3)

proof politicians are more ethical than journalists

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You're full of shit.
JOUR 400. Media Law and Ethics (3)

I see you dropped your bogus claim of journalists needing an education beyond junior high school.

 

[Polishprince]

Republicans should have participated in the hearing

Why should Pelosi cooperate with Congressional Republicans after they refused to cooperate with her?

Because President Trump has a right to discovery as part of the Democrat Persecution of him.

Its called "due process".

 

[rightwinger]

Because President Trump has a right to discovery as part of the Democrat Persecution of him.

Its called "due process".

Trump has legal representation that is due process

Dems have no obligation to help him