Nancy Pelosi - MISS LUBE RACK 1955

007

Charter Member
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
46,317
Reaction score
16,109
Points
2,250
Location
Podunk, WI
You really care what cons are laughing about?

It's a joke, sure a few think it's real, but I doubt many actually do.
You obviously haven't checked the boards and blogs. A disturbing number took it, and some are still taking it, as fact. When confronted with the truth a surprising number said, " well, can you really believe snopes?" It's a sad reflection on the state of political discourse amongst those who would rather hate than think.
Republicans hate snopes because it consistently shoots down their propaganda
Wrong... we're just not as STUPID as you libtards to believe a couple of old burnt out hippie leftists...

Snopes.com is a Scam
For the past few years snopes.com: Urban Legends Reference Pages has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell all final word' on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the Website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticims - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have
the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues. I can personally vouch for that complaint.

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are jewish - very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings.. Gee, what a shock?
Snopes.com is a Scam >> Four Winds 10 - Truth Winds
 
Last edited:

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
212,799
Reaction score
38,697
Points
2,190
You obviously haven't checked the boards and blogs. A disturbing number took it, and some are still taking it, as fact. When confronted with the truth a surprising number said, " well, can you really believe snopes?" It's a sad reflection on the state of political discourse amongst those who would rather hate than think.
Republicans hate snopes because it consistently shoots down their propaganda
Wrong... we're just not as STUPID as you libtards to believe a couple of old burnt out hippie leftists...

Snopes.com is a Scam
For the past few years snopes.com: Urban Legends Reference Pages has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell all final word' on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the Website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticims - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have
the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues. I can personally vouch for that complaint.

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are jewish - very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings.. Gee, what a shock?
Snopes.com is a Scam >> Four Winds 10 - Truth Winds
snopes is run by jews?

nuff said
 

konradv

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
28,269
Reaction score
4,322
Points
280
Location
Baltimore
You obviously haven't checked the boards and blogs. A disturbing number took it, and some are still taking it, as fact. When confronted with the truth a surprising number said, " well, can you really believe snopes?" It's a sad reflection on the state of political discourse amongst those who would rather hate than think.
Republicans hate snopes because it consistently shoots down their propaganda
Wrong... we're just not as STUPID as you libtards to believe a couple of old burnt out hippie leftists...

Snopes.com is a Scam
For the past few years snopes.com: Urban Legends Reference Pages has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell all final word' on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the Website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticims - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have
the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues. I can personally vouch for that complaint.

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are jewish - very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings.. Gee, what a shock?
Snopes.com is a Scam >> Four Winds 10 - Truth Winds
I'll stack up their veracity any day to the kinds of cites we get from the rightist media. They do their research. It's obvious that those who post things like we see in the OP, don't.
 

syrenn

Rookie
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
47,839
Reaction score
11,195
Points
0
This is what Pelosi really looked like at 20 in 1960.

View attachment 25737

BTW, can someone give me a heads up on how to post pictures larger? Mine always are small, but I've noticed others aren't having that problem. Thanks

when you google an image.... click on it. Look for where it says more sizes. A good post pic is about 450x 450

pm me if you need more help
 

dilloduck

Diamond Member
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
53,240
Reaction score
5,794
Points
1,850
Location
Austin, TX

peach174

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Messages
26,246
Reaction score
6,761
Points
290
Location
S.E. AZ
Well this is pretty funny.
The left are quick to get the word out that this is a hoax of Pelosi from snopes.

Yet from the very same source that showed that the pin up of Palin was also a hoax;
snopes.com: Sarah Palin Photos
The left believe it (still do) and then continue to spread the lie over and over again.
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
212,799
Reaction score
38,697
Points
2,190
Well this is pretty funny.
The left are quick to get the word out that this is a hoax of Pelosi from snopes.

Yet from the very same source that showed that the pin up of Palin was also a hoax;
snopes.com: Sarah Palin Photos
The left believe it (still do) and then continue to spread the lie over and over again.
That pinup of palin holding a rifle is fake

But Nail'n Palin was REAL
 

dilloduck

Diamond Member
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
53,240
Reaction score
5,794
Points
1,850
Location
Austin, TX
Be fair now--at one time Nancy had to have had a damn nice rack. Look at everything that's hanging down to her waist now.
Ewww, I'd rather not...

If the Kennedy picture is real, she wasn't particularly nice looking, even back in the day...
Maybe I should have used the word "consider" instead of look ?
 

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
46,750
Reaction score
10,554
Points
2,040
Location
Western Va.
Actually, it was Sarah Palin who was a "lube rack queen" and Republicans still fawn over every statement
Ah left wingers lash out with inane comments at the woman they love to hate. Typical.
I find it amusing with the far right wing giggling over a bogus Pelosi pinup while it was obvious that a young Pelosi was meeting with JFK while it was Conservative star Palin who was involved in the pinup/beauty queen circuit
Young Pelosi "was meeting with JFK" so she couldn't have been posing with a couple of grease monkeys? Pretty slim.
 

peach174

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Messages
26,246
Reaction score
6,761
Points
290
Location
S.E. AZ
Well this is pretty funny.
The left are quick to get the word out that this is a hoax of Pelosi from snopes.

Yet from the very same source that showed that the pin up of Palin was also a hoax;
snopes.com: Sarah Palin Photos
The left believe it (still do) and then continue to spread the lie over and over again.
That pinup of palin holding a rifle is fake

But Nail'n Palin was REAL
But I'm happy that the porn industry didn't do one of Pelosi that would have made everyone want to gouge their eyes out of their sockets.
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
212,799
Reaction score
38,697
Points
2,190
Ah left wingers lash out with inane comments at the woman they love to hate. Typical.
I find it amusing with the far right wing giggling over a bogus Pelosi pinup while it was obvious that a young Pelosi was meeting with JFK while it was Conservative star Palin who was involved in the pinup/beauty queen circuit
Young Pelosi "was meeting with JFK" so she couldn't have been posing with a couple of grease monkeys? Pretty slim.
You are too fucking funny
 

Two Thumbs

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
38,220
Reaction score
6,503
Points
1,140
Location
Where ever I go, there I am.
It's not her. Funny how all the righties are getting hosed by this hoax. It's all over the wingnut blogs and message boards!!! The pictures are actually from 1951, when Nancy would have been 11 and were taken in L.A., when Nancy's from Baltimore.

Along For The Ride: Boulevard Beauty Queens... Muller Bros. Oldsmoblie
You really care what cons are laughing about?

It's a joke, sure a few think it's real, but I doubt many actually do.
You obviously haven't checked the boards and blogs. A disturbing number took it, and some are still taking it, as fact. When confronted with the truth a surprising number said, " well, can you really believe snopes?" It's a sad reflection on the state of political discourse amongst those who would rather hate than think.
I see what you are saying

It's like that thread about the scotus that didn't put his hand over his heart during the Anthem at obama inaug.

Every tard demanded that we talk shit about him, we didn't, we looked it up, unlike them, and when we posted that it was a sham, I demanded some apologies.

Shockingly enough, not only did none of them man the fuck up, one even kept going.

well, ok

I wasn't shocked
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
212,799
Reaction score
38,697
Points
2,190
You really care what cons are laughing about?

It's a joke, sure a few think it's real, but I doubt many actually do.
You obviously haven't checked the boards and blogs. A disturbing number took it, and some are still taking it, as fact. When confronted with the truth a surprising number said, " well, can you really believe snopes?" It's a sad reflection on the state of political discourse amongst those who would rather hate than think.
I see what you are saying

It's like that thread about the scotus that didn't put his hand over his heart during the Anthem at obama inaug.

Every tard demanded that we talk shit about him, we didn't, we looked it up, unlike them, and when we posted that it was a sham, I demanded some apologies.

Shockingly enough, not only did none of them man the fuck up, one even kept going.

well, ok

I wasn't shocked
I believe it was removing his ugly hat

When are you going to apologize to Pelosi?
 

Two Thumbs

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
38,220
Reaction score
6,503
Points
1,140
Location
Where ever I go, there I am.
You obviously haven't checked the boards and blogs. A disturbing number took it, and some are still taking it, as fact. When confronted with the truth a surprising number said, " well, can you really believe snopes?" It's a sad reflection on the state of political discourse amongst those who would rather hate than think.
I see what you are saying

It's like that thread about the scotus that didn't put his hand over his heart during the Anthem at obama inaug.

Every tard demanded that we talk shit about him, we didn't, we looked it up, unlike them, and when we posted that it was a sham, I demanded some apologies.

Shockingly enough, not only did none of them man the fuck up, one even kept going.

well, ok

I wasn't shocked
I believe it was removing his ugly hat

When are you going to apologize to Pelosi?
when she goes a year w/o giving me a good reason to hate her.

she's got 11 months to go
 

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,820
Reaction score
9,870
Points
2,040
It would seem that democrat politicians naturally gravitate to "lube rack queens". A young babe alone with Kennedy is not necessarily a good thing just as we found out with Klinton.
Actually, it was Sarah Palin who was a "lube rack queen" and Republicans still fawn over every statement
Ah left wingers lash out with inane comments at the woman they love to hate. Typical.
Gotta love it. The right winger nutters Lash out with inane comments about a woman they love to hate. Typical that they can hand it out but they can't take it.

The very worst they can say about our First Lady is about her bottom. The worst they can say about Nancy Pelosi is a photoshopped photo but, if there's a $arah Palin thread, the best they can say about her is her cup size.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top