"My abortion was the best decision I ever made. It was an act of self love."

"My abortion was the best decision I ever made. It was an act of self love."​

FWF6Ai6XoAALAQ4.webp
 
And there are lifelong smokers who never develop lung cancer. Are you suggesting that the anomalous justifies the opposite trend?

I'm saying "having a shitty childhood potentially" isn't a reason to have an abortion.
 
I love myself for killing that thing inside of me. Argh!


Activist describes her abortion as 'self-love' in wake of Roe reversal​






Perhaps she shouldnt have let that original "thing" inside her to begin with.
 
What gives you the right to force other people to live by your religious doctrine?
"Thou shalt not kill" is pretty good religious doctrine for a civil society.
 
I am invoking your religion.

Without God, we are bags of stardust. Who cares?
I don't subscribe to any religion.

And I know I've told you this before nut I am not an atheist. I have repeatedly said that there is no evidence that gods exist or not.

IF gods exist I am pretty sure that none of them are the god in the bible, the Torah or the Koran
 
"Thou shalt not kill" is pretty good religious doctrine for a civil society.
And yet people have always killed people and will always kill people

We just have a million ways to rationalize it
 
And yet people have always killed people and will always kill people

We just have a million ways to rationalize it
Making something illegal discourages it, but it doesn't eliminate it. Like a border wall discourages illegal immigration, but won't entirely eliminate it.
 
Making something illegal discourages it, but it doesn't eliminate it. Like a border wall discourages illegal immigration, but won't entirely eliminate it.
The question is should abortion be illegal.
 
The question is should abortion be illegal.
Actually, we went on a tangent regarding whether religious doctrine should be a basis for law. I suggested that "thou shalt not kill" was a pretty good one to base a law upon. Then you took the binary route of implying that if a law doesn't totally eliminate a behavior, it's worthless. I just illustrated that's the argument the left uses regarding border walls.
 
Last edited:
Actually, we went on a tangent regarding whether religious doctrine should be a basis for law. I suggested that "thou shalt not kill" was a pretty good one to base a law upon. Then you took the binary route of implying that if a law doesn't totally eliminate a behavior, it's worthless. I just illustrated that's the argument the left uses regarding border walls.
Never said laws were worthless

The banning of abortion because it is killing is hypocritical at best especially when you consider that most right wing religious people support capital punishment.

Human kill
Humans have always killed
Humans will always kill.

It's what we do.

I don't see abortion before viability outside the womb as equivalent to the murder of any person who has been born.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom