Much of the world ignored the threat Islamic fundamentalists pose. The world better pay attention when a Roman Catholic pope talks about a global war.
I will believe the pope’s motive is pure when he connects the United Nations to the violence. All of the killing done by Muslims in the name of Allah in various organizations is being engineered by New World Order fanatics working through the United Nations.
It is highly unlikely the American people will be allowed to withdraw from the UN, but there is a slim possibility a majority of Muslims in every Muslim country will force their governments to walkout en bloc once they understand how Islam is being manipulated by brutal men. In short: The only way the killing will end is when the ideology that keeps the United Nations in business is discarded. Once the entire Muslim world is out of the United Nations the New World Order’s plan for a one government world falls apart.
Incidentally, Dopey’s solution is for the Christians while Muslim terrorists cheer for the lions:
The war will only end when non-Muslims and non-Christians stop being conned into letting the United Nations choose sides. Then, and only then, will the war end permanently. Neither Islam, nor the Roman Catholic Church, can fight a major war over territory —— territory is the bottom line. Clearly, Muslim infiltration is about territory, while Christians must conquer with a traditional army. Infiltrating Muslim counties will not work.
One side must control the territory inhabited by the other side. That is only way to destroy a major religion, or at least render it harmless for all time. Muslims already started a war of territorial conquest, while the pope is hinting at a third world war.
Frankly, the way things are stacking up it looks like worldwide Socialism is taking the best of it. Socialists cannot be unhappy about Christians and Muslims killing each other. Us poor schmucks in the middle who do not want to see any religion win, including Socialism/Communism, are getting all the worst of it.
NOTE: The failed League of Nations was created after the end of World War One. The United Nations replaced the League after WW II ended. A global government administered by the United Nations after the next major war ends is the next logical step. That is why Taqiyya the Liar is doing everything in his power to protect Islam while his policies drive Americans towards United Nations control.
http://www.lucianne.com/images/lucianne/DailyPhoto/2015-11-16.png
Incidentally, the Chicago sewer rat said that his strategy is going to work. He forgot to say that it will work for Islamic terrorists. Throwing occupation on the table is part of his strategy. He practically says do not war against Islam:
The fact is that militarily occupying a defeated country is not the only choice. The lesson learned in the Algerian War (1954 - 1962), and the more recent war in Iraq, taught that future wars must be fought without occupation as the end game when it is certain the enemy will fallback on terrorism to drive out the occupiers.
NOTE: France’s problems in Algeria were all about wine if I remember correctly. Wealthy Frenchmen had millions of acres of vineyards in Algeria. The table wine realized from those grapes was the wine the French people drank. After France lost Algeria most of those vineyards went to ruin because Muslims are supposedly teetotalers. The wines produced from French grapes were exported to acquire foreign currency. That’s how I remember the French/Algerian conflict. An old seaman I knew called it the Muscatel War. More importantly, the Algerian War was also a revolution; nevertheless, the methods Muslims employed to defeat France was the template for Islam’s strategy today as well as making occupation obsolete.
Finally, never forget why most countries remained neutral during WWI and WWII. Neutrality will be far more widespread in a shooting war between Christian countries and Muslim countries. Even then a few Muslim and Christian countries might opt out if they can. In truth, “neutral countries” would be living in a fool’s paradise should they root for one side or the other —— well-knowing they will be next.
p.s. As I’ve said many times, I have no objection to killing priesthoods who want to kill me, but it makes no sense for a free people to surrender their freedoms by replacing one religion with another, and that includes Socialism-cum-global-government.
Pope Francis called the terrorist attack in Paris "a piece" of a Third World War, broadening the scope of the world's response to one between good and evil.
Speaking Saturday to an Italian TV network, the Pope said there is no "religious or human justification for these things," adding that the murders perpetrated by adherents of the Islamic State, were "not human."
Speaking Saturday to an Italian TV network, the Pope said there is no "religious or human justification for these things," adding that the murders perpetrated by adherents of the Islamic State, were "not human."
Third World War: Pope Francis sets Paris attacks in global fight
By Al Weaver
11/14/15 11:08 AM •Updated: 11/14/15 1:19 PM
By Al Weaver
11/14/15 11:08 AM •Updated: 11/14/15 1:19 PM
I will believe the pope’s motive is pure when he connects the United Nations to the violence. All of the killing done by Muslims in the name of Allah in various organizations is being engineered by New World Order fanatics working through the United Nations.
It is highly unlikely the American people will be allowed to withdraw from the UN, but there is a slim possibility a majority of Muslims in every Muslim country will force their governments to walkout en bloc once they understand how Islam is being manipulated by brutal men. In short: The only way the killing will end is when the ideology that keeps the United Nations in business is discarded. Once the entire Muslim world is out of the United Nations the New World Order’s plan for a one government world falls apart.
Incidentally, Dopey’s solution is for the Christians while Muslim terrorists cheer for the lions:
Madonna: Only Way to Stop Terrorism is to ‘Love Unconditionally,’ Keep Having ‘Fun’
by Daniel Nussbaum
15 Nov 2015
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...stop-terrorism-love-unconditionally-keep-fun/
by Daniel Nussbaum
15 Nov 2015
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...stop-terrorism-love-unconditionally-keep-fun/
The war will only end when non-Muslims and non-Christians stop being conned into letting the United Nations choose sides. Then, and only then, will the war end permanently. Neither Islam, nor the Roman Catholic Church, can fight a major war over territory —— territory is the bottom line. Clearly, Muslim infiltration is about territory, while Christians must conquer with a traditional army. Infiltrating Muslim counties will not work.
One side must control the territory inhabited by the other side. That is only way to destroy a major religion, or at least render it harmless for all time. Muslims already started a war of territorial conquest, while the pope is hinting at a third world war.
Frankly, the way things are stacking up it looks like worldwide Socialism is taking the best of it. Socialists cannot be unhappy about Christians and Muslims killing each other. Us poor schmucks in the middle who do not want to see any religion win, including Socialism/Communism, are getting all the worst of it.
NOTE: The failed League of Nations was created after the end of World War One. The United Nations replaced the League after WW II ended. A global government administered by the United Nations after the next major war ends is the next logical step. That is why Taqiyya the Liar is doing everything in his power to protect Islam while his policies drive Americans towards United Nations control.
Incidentally, the Chicago sewer rat said that his strategy is going to work. He forgot to say that it will work for Islamic terrorists. Throwing occupation on the table is part of his strategy. He practically says do not war against Islam:
“It is not just my view but the view of my closest military and civilian advisers that that would be a mistake,” Obama said, adding that’s “because we would see a repetition of what we’ve seen before, which is if you do not have local populations that are committed to inclusive governance and who are pushing back against ideological extremes, that they resurface, unless we’re prepared to have a permanent occupation of these countries.”
‘We’re going to see it through’: Pres. Obama defends U.S. strategy against ISIS after Paris attacks
Posted 10:58 am, November 16, 2015, by CNN Wire
'We're going to see it through': Pres. Obama defends U.S. strategy against ISIS after Paris attacks
Posted 10:58 am, November 16, 2015, by CNN Wire
'We're going to see it through': Pres. Obama defends U.S. strategy against ISIS after Paris attacks
The fact is that militarily occupying a defeated country is not the only choice. The lesson learned in the Algerian War (1954 - 1962), and the more recent war in Iraq, taught that future wars must be fought without occupation as the end game when it is certain the enemy will fallback on terrorism to drive out the occupiers.
6. Destroy everything with all of the technology available short of nuclear weapons. Destroy every commercial building. Destroy every structure higher than 25 feet. Destroy every dam, every bridge, every tunnel, every power plant, every airport, every railroad. When that is done do not sign a peace treaty with people who advocated war in the first place. Never signing a peace treaty means that every time a defeated enemy rebuilds something knock it down again until they curse the reason they started their war.
7. Systematically keep the defeated people living in the dark ages for a century.
8. Every neutral country that accepts refugees from a defeated country will be seen as committing an act of war.
9. Anyone found guilty providing aid and comfort to the enemy during, or after the war ends, would be sentenced to living the remainder of their life in the defeated country.
7. Systematically keep the defeated people living in the dark ages for a century.
8. Every neutral country that accepts refugees from a defeated country will be seen as committing an act of war.
9. Anyone found guilty providing aid and comfort to the enemy during, or after the war ends, would be sentenced to living the remainder of their life in the defeated country.
NOTE: France’s problems in Algeria were all about wine if I remember correctly. Wealthy Frenchmen had millions of acres of vineyards in Algeria. The table wine realized from those grapes was the wine the French people drank. After France lost Algeria most of those vineyards went to ruin because Muslims are supposedly teetotalers. The wines produced from French grapes were exported to acquire foreign currency. That’s how I remember the French/Algerian conflict. An old seaman I knew called it the Muscatel War. More importantly, the Algerian War was also a revolution; nevertheless, the methods Muslims employed to defeat France was the template for Islam’s strategy today as well as making occupation obsolete.
Finally, never forget why most countries remained neutral during WWI and WWII. Neutrality will be far more widespread in a shooting war between Christian countries and Muslim countries. Even then a few Muslim and Christian countries might opt out if they can. In truth, “neutral countries” would be living in a fool’s paradise should they root for one side or the other —— well-knowing they will be next.
p.s. As I’ve said many times, I have no objection to killing priesthoods who want to kill me, but it makes no sense for a free people to surrender their freedoms by replacing one religion with another, and that includes Socialism-cum-global-government.
