The Trumptards are triggered because they're racist losers who want to see black men die.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course it was politically charged. So was the Kyle Rittenhouse ruling. So was the George Zimmerman ruling. So are countless other rulings.That still doesn't change the fact it was politically charged.
Though both were they were quite different.Of course it was politically charged. So was the Kyle Rittenhouse ruling. So was the George Zimmerman ruling. So are countless other rulings.
Being politically charged doesn’t invalidate the results. You just want to whine that the system is rigged when you don’t get the outcome you wanted.
I never said anything about the appeal.So it seems like no legal authority shares your ignorant opinion.
It shows up in routine toxicology of blood and urine.And what signs will point to Opioid or Fentanyl overdose during an autopsy?
Well, your opinion doesn't count, does it.
Riddle me this: If Floyd had not been stoned to the gills, would he have been paranoid and resisted the officers?Riddle me this. If the police had just impounded Floyd's car, wrote him a ticket, and let him go on his way (which is really all the supposed offense really merited) do you think he would have died that afternoon? He might have died in a month or a year, because he was in poor health, but clearly, Chauvin's actions caused his death, either by choking him or putting him under so much stress his heart gave out.
It shows up in routine toxicology of blood and urine.
Who said evidence was ignored?Did you hear about the evidence in the trial? Three medical experts testified that it was Chauvin’s actions that killed Floyd. So what evidence was ignored? What was missing?
Why don't you look it up.Aren’t there distinctive physical signs of an overdose beside toxicology?
You’re just whining because you didn‘t get the result you wanted.Though both were they were quite different.
Good. Because you’re in no position to say that the medical examiner is wrong.
Then what’s your point here?Any opinion that you have about this case that is not in alignment with the medical examiner’s opinion is a stupid opinion, which you’re more than welcome to hold.
What result was I wanting? Have I said?You’re just whining because you didn‘t get the result you wanted.
Excellent. So do you agree with the medical examiner when he ruled that it was a homicide? Remember, he’s the medical expert. Not you.No need to remind me when I already said I didn’t say he was wrong.
To remind you that any opinion of yours that directly goes against what the medical examiner says about this autopsy, is a stupid opinion.Then what’s your point here?
Chauvin to be found innocent.What result was I wanting? Have I said?
Why don't you look it up.
No I was wanting justice to do it's job it failed with this new informationChauvin to be found innocent.
Did you or did you not want Chauvin to be found innocent?No I was wanting justice to do it's job it failed with this new information
fuck off, grammar nazi.What's it like having no life?
How does one "incrase" a sentence?
He should be with the latest informationDid you or did you not want Chauvin to be found innocent?