Ghost of a Rider
Gold Member
I disagree that it was homicide, yes.So you don’t agree with the medical examiner’s conclusion that this was a homicide. In your opinion, the medical examiner is wrong. Correct?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree that it was homicide, yes.So you don’t agree with the medical examiner’s conclusion that this was a homicide. In your opinion, the medical examiner is wrong. Correct?
So you, having no medical experience whatsoever, believe that the medical expert who conducted the autopsy is wrong. Correct?I disagree that it was homicide, yes.
You think they should get more respect from civilians when they murder civilians?
I've read through Chauvin's history.... He apparently had problems in the past with applying too much force. Not sure what happened to the police psychiatric department in that one? However the general principle stands. A career criminal like Floyd exponentially increases his chance of severe injury or even fatal injury by his multiplicity of very poor choices up to an including the complete violation of others civil rights which ominously and almost ironically became the thrust of the Floyd riots.Floyd wasn't the biggest lowlife there. There was a murderer there, also.
I think he believes like most people that all experts these days are subject to PC pressure are well nformed about the consequences of their lack of cooperation.So you, having no medical experience whatsoever, believe that the medical expert who conducted the autopsy is wrong. Correct?
What the hell makes you think I believe that?What in the hell makes you think that a career criminal that has no respect for the law is going to suddenly respect the police officer when he's confronted with a situation of force brought on by his lack of respect for the law?
Or maybe you’re just whining bullshit excuses because you didn’t get the outcome you wanted.I think he believes like most people that all experts these days are subject to PC pressure are well nformed about the consequences of their lack of cooperation.
When we all know it is rigged for them.Or maybe you’re just whining bullshit excuses because you didn’t get the outcome you wanted.
Whenever you guys don’t get what you want, you guys whine that the system is rigged against you.
Or maybe you’re just whining bullshit excuses because you didn’t get the outcome you wanted.
Whenever you guys don’t get what you want, you guys whine that the system is rigged against you.
In other words you long for the Good Ole Days, when Chauvin would have gotten a medal for bravery and a promotion for murdering a black man, not life in prison.I have some sympathy for your comment but honestly considering the unimaginable politically correct pressure that is applied to almost every institution ( Not just by Democrats) especially within the last 20 years to comply with social lysenkoism I don't think it's overreacting.
Or maybe you’re just a sore loser crybaby whining because you didn’t get the result you want.I have some sympathy for your comment but honestly considering the unimaginable politically correct pressure that is applied to almost every institution ( Not just by Democrats) especially within the last 20 years to comply with social lysenkoism I don't think it's overreacting.
In other words you long for the Good Ole Days, when Chauvin would have gotten a medal for bravery and a promotion for murdering a black man, not life in prison.
That Floyd is a bad man, it's amazing how he was able to put his knee on his own neck and then made it look like Chauvin did it.George Floyd murdered himself.
you should be in someone's legal team, hero. you solved the case.George Floyd murdered himself.
you should be in someone's legal team, hero. you solved the case.
Sentences start with a capitalized word, you illiterate imbecile.fuck off, grammar nazi.
hahaha. obviously, with your expertise, you can solve ANY case. however. it is a little troubling that you cannot retain your obvious expertise and save poor victims of the justice system, like, for real. dream on.What case is that? The case of a career criminal who left the trail the victims behind him who should have been put away years before he was actually arrested and didn't survive the self-inflicted ordeal?
Didn’t say he was wrong because I don’t know.So you, having no medical experience whatsoever, believe that the medical expert who conducted the autopsy is wrong. Correct?
I didn't say you said he was wrong. I said you believe he's wrong. Am I correct in saying that you believe he's wrong?Didn’t say he was wrong because I don’t know.
That depends on the context. Do I question his pathological expertise? No.I didn't say you said he was wrong. I said you believe he's wrong. Am I correct in saying that you believe he's wrong?