jacksonlamb
Platinum Member
- Feb 3, 2026
- 7,835
- 3,806
- 893
Anybody on this Board posting thinks we are Socialist needs to go back to high school.
Municipal Democratic Socialism
- Thread starter DGS49
- Start date
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,690
- 1,169
- 140
" Concerning Ideological Affluence Of Elected Or Appointed Bureaucratic Authorities "
* Theistic Capitalists Facilitating Treason Against Us First Amendment Through Socialism Of Religious Education *
The theistic capitalists seeking exclusion from private school accreditation to sectarian supremacists for fictional ishmaelism are simply paving a way to its own worst expectations , as traitors supporting sedition of scotus and facilitation of treason against us first amendment by legislatures .
Those states which dismantled its private school voucher programs , because its instantiation constitutes treason , are being coerced by threats of prejudicial apportionment from federal funding for education by the strumpet administration .,
So state and federal legislatures , along with federal court appointments , are significantly more compelling in affects through public policy than are municipalities .
* Theistic Capitalists Facilitating Treason Against Us First Amendment Through Socialism Of Religious Education *
The secular humanism socialists are complicit with sectarian humanism socialists in collaborating with theistic communists and theistic capitalists , so that us tax payers fund religious instruction , indoctrination and proselytizing to captive audiences of children and adolescents by means of private school voucher programs .
The theistic capitalists seeking exclusion from private school accreditation to sectarian supremacists for fictional ishmaelism are simply paving a way to its own worst expectations , as traitors supporting sedition of scotus and facilitation of treason against us first amendment by legislatures .
Those states which dismantled its private school voucher programs , because its instantiation constitutes treason , are being coerced by threats of prejudicial apportionment from federal funding for education by the strumpet administration .,
So state and federal legislatures , along with federal court appointments , are significantly more compelling in affects through public policy than are municipalities .
Moonglow
Diamond Member
Congress allowed Trump to purchase an interest in corporations so the US owns part of the company. What do you call that?
Democratic socialist Janeese Lewis George wins Washington, D.C., mayoral primary
NBC News projects Lewis George has won the Democratic nomination, setting her up to manage the capital city and its relationship with President Donald Trump.www.nbcnews.com
The basics of "socialism" are fairly well known. Private property is abolished, the Sovereign owns not only all property but also the means of production (farms, factories, etc.), workers control how production occurs and how they participate in it, the resources of the society (e.g., food, housing, medical care) are equally available to all, and every citizen is equal.
Socialism is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution because, among many other things, the Sovereign is not empowered to confiscate property for such uses, not empowered to produce any non-military goods, and in fact not empowered to provide individual benefits to the citizens and/or residents of the country. Democrats, of course, ignore this last one.
As a result, absent a focused group of Constitutional Amendments, the U.S. government cannot implement a socialist regime. But Democrats in Congress, aided by a compliant Supreme Court, have managed to implement numerous policies and programs that have a socialist bent, with the biggest examples being Social Security and Medicare, both of of which are grossly unconstitutional, since Congress lacks the "power" to create or manage them.
But I digress.
Who cares if a municipality wishes to implement LOCAL policies and programs that emulate the "Workers' Paradise"? What if a city wants to build a large number of apartments or houses with city funds and make them available to the citizenry at a minimal cost? So what? What if a city wants to open a chain of supermarkets to operate at - or below - cost, so that the local citizens can buy food at the lowest possible cost? And so on.
Why would that matter to anyone who is not living in that city and/or paying its taxes? As long as MY Federal or State taxes are not subsidizing those programs, they should be free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't step on the guidelines of the U.S. Constitution. I may think that those supermarkets are a stupid, counterproductive idea, but to me it's just entertainment, like watching professional sports.
I don't understand all the fretting about these "Democratic Socialists" getting elected in municipalities around the country.
What I see as a valid concern is the D-S candidates who are getting elected to Congress, and the similar people - usually hiding their personal ideologies - who are being nominated and appointed to the Federal courts. That's where it becomes a problem. As for cities, WGAF?
A government acquiring direct ownership stakes or equity in private corporations is known as a federal equity investment or a government-backed enterprise. [1, 2, 3]
When the government provides bailouts or loans in exchange for partial or total corporate ownership, it is often called a bailout or corporate socialism. Critics on the political right sometimes refer to these moves as nationalizing the means of production or state capitalism. [1, 2, 3]
said 'indoctrination' in public education has become a million $$ battle with the feds Monk
~S~
the best Congress $$$ can buy Moon.......~S~
Moonglow
Diamond Member
But socialism!!!
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
Democratic socialist Janeese Lewis George wins Washington, D.C., mayoral primary
NBC News projects Lewis George has won the Democratic nomination, setting her up to manage the capital city and its relationship with President Donald Trump.
The basics of "socialism" are fairly well known. Private property is abolished, the Sovereign owns not only all property but also the means of production (farms, factories, etc.), workers control how production occurs and how they participate in it, the resources of the society (e.g., food, housing, medical care) are equally available to all, and every citizen is equal.
Socialism is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution because, among many other things, the Sovereign is not empowered to confiscate property for such uses, not empowered to produce any non-military goods, and in fact not empowered to provide individual benefits to the citizens and/or residents of the country. Democrats, of course, ignore this last one.
As a result, absent a focused group of Constitutional Amendments, the U.S. government cannot implement a socialist regime. But Democrats in Congress, aided by a compliant Supreme Court, have managed to implement numerous policies and programs that have a socialist bent, with the biggest examples being Social Security and Medicare, both of of which are grossly unconstitutional, since Congress lacks the "power" to create or manage them.
But I digress.
Who cares if a municipality wishes to implement LOCAL policies and programs that emulate the "Workers' Paradise"? What if a city wants to build a large number of apartments or houses with city funds and make them available to the citizenry at a minimal cost? So what? What if a city wants to open a chain of supermarkets to operate at - or below - cost, so that the local citizens can buy food at the lowest possible cost? And so on.
Why would that matter to anyone who is not living in that city and/or paying its taxes? As long as MY Federal or State taxes are not subsidizing those programs, they should be free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't step on the guidelines of the U.S. Constitution. I may think that those supermarkets are a stupid, counterproductive idea, but to me it's just entertainment, like watching professional sports.
I don't understand all the fretting about these "Democratic Socialists" getting elected in municipalities around the country.
What I see as a valid concern is the D-S candidates who are getting elected to Congress, and the similar people - usually hiding their personal ideologies - who are being nominated and appointed to the Federal courts. That's where it becomes a problem. As for cities, WGAF?
The first sentence of this post is a lie and I stopped reading. Socialism does not "abolish private property ownership". That's a complete lie and everything posted thereafter is the product of a false premise.
Moonglow
Diamond Member
These political scientists never graduated from school.
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
They don't read or fact check, and they are the most economically clueless people who ever lived.
Washington D.C. local government gets a lot of money from the federal government, and they still screw it up.
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,690
- 1,169
- 140
" Free Fore Awl Incentives Of Autocratic Bureaucracies "
* Civil Servants Helping Themselves To State Capitalism *
. Riding The Dragon : The Biden's Chinese Secrets ( Full Documentary ) .
. Public Private Trust .
* Civil Servants Helping Themselves To State Capitalism *
Something close to insider trading and conflicts of interest through no bid contracts , nepotism and selective endowment to fiscal libertarians ( economic liberals ) entreating kleptocracy .
. Riding The Dragon : The Biden's Chinese Secrets ( Full Documentary ) .
. Public Private Trust .
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,690
- 1,169
- 140
" Shameful Populism For Democracy As Tyranny By Collective Majority Against Independence Of The Individual "
* Fabricating Fantastical Puritanical Excuses *
Us governments contract exclusively for non sectarian products or services , either directly , or indirectly through private school vouchers , irrespective of whether a sectarian or non sectarian observer competes for and provides the non sectarian products or services such as private school education .
scotus committed sedition and malfeasance of office in carson v makin , on behalf of traitors now legislating treason against us 1st amendment , and such should be prosecuted charged with and impeached for the crime , unless readily recanting the decision and correcting policies and actions !
Jurisprudence , political pundits , fee press and public at large remain ignorant to expectations for and from the first amendment of us constitution .
Along with theistic communists , theists of fictional ishmaelism expect socialism for sectarian education through funding by institutions of government , so why are theistic capitalists treating the first us constitutional amendment as a triviality ?
* Foolers Of Rulers *
* Iterative Reference *
Negative liberties represent protections , independence and individualism .
Positive liberties represent endowments , dependence and collectivism .
* Fabricating Fantastical Puritanical Excuses *
Such is not a sufficient justification , as there are two clauses in us first amendment and both must be satisfied concurrently .
Us governments contract exclusively for non sectarian products or services , either directly , or indirectly through private school vouchers , irrespective of whether a sectarian or non sectarian observer competes for and provides the non sectarian products or services such as private school education .
scotus committed sedition and malfeasance of office in carson v makin , on behalf of traitors now legislating treason against us 1st amendment , and such should be prosecuted charged with and impeached for the crime , unless readily recanting the decision and correcting policies and actions !
Jurisprudence , political pundits , fee press and public at large remain ignorant to expectations for and from the first amendment of us constitution .
Along with theistic communists , theists of fictional ishmaelism expect socialism for sectarian education through funding by institutions of government , so why are theistic capitalists treating the first us constitutional amendment as a triviality ?
* Foolers Of Rulers *
* Iterative Reference *
Negative liberties represent protections , independence and individualism .
Positive liberties represent endowments , dependence and collectivism .
Last edited:
0311
Diamond Member
Democratic socialist Janeese Lewis George wins Washington, D.C., mayoral primary
NBC News projects Lewis George has won the Democratic nomination, setting her up to manage the capital city and its relationship with President Donald Trump.
The basics of "socialism" are fairly well known. Private property is abolished, the Sovereign owns not only all property but also the means of production (farms, factories, etc.), workers control how production occurs and how they participate in it, the resources of the society (e.g., food, housing, medical care) are equally available to all, and every citizen is equal.
Socialism is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution because, among many other things, the Sovereign is not empowered to confiscate property for such uses, not empowered to produce any non-military goods, and in fact not empowered to provide individual benefits to the citizens and/or residents of the country. Democrats, of course, ignore this last one.
As a result, absent a focused group of Constitutional Amendments, the U.S. government cannot implement a socialist regime. But Democrats in Congress, aided by a compliant Supreme Court, have managed to implement numerous policies and programs that have a socialist bent, with the biggest examples being Social Security and Medicare, both of of which are grossly unconstitutional, since Congress lacks the "power" to create or manage them.
But I digress.
Who cares if a municipality wishes to implement LOCAL policies and programs that emulate the "Workers' Paradise"? What if a city wants to build a large number of apartments or houses with city funds and make them available to the citizenry at a minimal cost? So what? What if a city wants to open a chain of supermarkets to operate at - or below - cost, so that the local citizens can buy food at the lowest possible cost? And so on.
Why would that matter to anyone who is not living in that city and/or paying its taxes? As long as MY Federal or State taxes are not subsidizing those programs, they should be free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't step on the guidelines of the U.S. Constitution. I may think that those supermarkets are a stupid, counterproductive idea, but to me it's just entertainment, like watching professional sports.
I don't understand all the fretting about these "Democratic Socialists" getting elected in municipalities around the country.
What I see as a valid concern is the D-S candidates who are getting elected to Congress, and the similar people - usually hiding their personal ideologies - who are being nominated and appointed to the Federal courts. That's where it becomes a problem. As for cities, WGAF?
D.C. a Black Majority City. Stop crying in your beer and grow up.
AI Overview
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that parents possess a fundamental, constitutionally protected right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children, as long as it does not directly risk the child's safety and well-being. Recent decisions have reinforced these rights across multiple domains.
~S~
Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 4,690
- 1,169
- 140
" Gold Den Rules From Fools For Socialism Religious Pogroms "
* Theistic Communists And Theistic Socialists Need A New Fix To Replace Illegal Immigration Gravy Train *
The free exercise meme applied to dispatch the respect for an establishment of religion is incorrect , traitorous , disingenuous and deceitful , as both clauses of us 1st amendment must be satisfied concurrently , else one exercises the intellect of a HALF WIT .
Us governments contract for non sectarian products or services , full stop , period , end of story .
That contracts for non sectarian products are services does not prevent sectarian organizations from competing for and providing non sectarian products or services , whereby both clauses of us 14th amendment are concurrently satisfied .
Nothing should prevent a sectarian institution from facilitating a private school to provide non sectarian instruction , and that would be a non seditious conclusion of scotus .
The dumbfounded decision by scotus in carson v makin is sedition for failing to intimate and elucidate a clearly apparent and common sense conclusion to validate us first amendment rather than committing sedition against it .
Those legislatures which implement positive liberties of endowments from taxpayers , for use as funds for religious education , even indirectly via private school vouchers , constitutes respecting an establishment of religion , and is treason against us first amendment .
* Mental Retardation Of Half Wit Zealotry For Sedition And Treason *
. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1088_dbfi.pdf .
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
[June 21, 2022]
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.
Maine has enacted a program of tuition assistance for parents who live in school districts that do not operate a secondary school of their own. Under the program, parents designate the secondary school they would like their child to attend—public or private—and the school district transmits payments to that school to help defray the costs of tuition. Most private schools are eligible to receive the payments, so long as they are “nonsectarian.” The question presented is whether this restriction violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.
...
Maine’s “nonsectarian” requirement for its other wise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Regardless of how the benefit and restriction are described, the program operates to identify and exclude otherwise eligible schools on the basis of their religious exercise. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
. Are Us States Prohibited From Complying With Us 1st Amendment By Us 10th Amendment ? .
* Theistic Communists And Theistic Socialists Need A New Fix To Replace Illegal Immigration Gravy Train *
None are contesting that children be disallowed from attending and receiving private instruction from sectarian or religious schools , which is the extent to which that ai overview would be applicable .
The free exercise meme applied to dispatch the respect for an establishment of religion is incorrect , traitorous , disingenuous and deceitful , as both clauses of us 1st amendment must be satisfied concurrently , else one exercises the intellect of a HALF WIT .
Us governments contract for non sectarian products or services , full stop , period , end of story .
That contracts for non sectarian products are services does not prevent sectarian organizations from competing for and providing non sectarian products or services , whereby both clauses of us 14th amendment are concurrently satisfied .
Nothing should prevent a sectarian institution from facilitating a private school to provide non sectarian instruction , and that would be a non seditious conclusion of scotus .
The dumbfounded decision by scotus in carson v makin is sedition for failing to intimate and elucidate a clearly apparent and common sense conclusion to validate us first amendment rather than committing sedition against it .
Those legislatures which implement positive liberties of endowments from taxpayers , for use as funds for religious education , even indirectly via private school vouchers , constitutes respecting an establishment of religion , and is treason against us first amendment .
* Mental Retardation Of Half Wit Zealotry For Sedition And Treason *
. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1088_dbfi.pdf .
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
[June 21, 2022]
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.
Maine has enacted a program of tuition assistance for parents who live in school districts that do not operate a secondary school of their own. Under the program, parents designate the secondary school they would like their child to attend—public or private—and the school district transmits payments to that school to help defray the costs of tuition. Most private schools are eligible to receive the payments, so long as they are “nonsectarian.” The question presented is whether this restriction violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.
...
Maine’s “nonsectarian” requirement for its other wise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Regardless of how the benefit and restriction are described, the program operates to identify and exclude otherwise eligible schools on the basis of their religious exercise. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
. Are Us States Prohibited From Complying With Us 1st Amendment By Us 10th Amendment ? .
Last edited:
DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 19,906
- 29,046
- 2,288
Democratic socialist Janeese Lewis George wins Washington, D.C., mayoral primary
NBC News projects Lewis George has won the Democratic nomination, setting her up to manage the capital city and its relationship with President Donald Trump.
The basics of "socialism" are fairly well known. Private property is abolished, the Sovereign owns not only all property but also the means of production (farms, factories, etc.), workers control how production occurs and how they participate in it, the resources of the society (e.g., food, housing, medical care) are equally available to all, and every citizen is equal.
Socialism is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution because, among many other things, the Sovereign is not empowered to confiscate property for such uses, not empowered to produce any non-military goods, and in fact not empowered to provide individual benefits to the citizens and/or residents of the country. Democrats, of course, ignore this last one.
As a result, absent a focused group of Constitutional Amendments, the U.S. government cannot implement a socialist regime. But Democrats in Congress, aided by a compliant Supreme Court, have managed to implement numerous policies and programs that have a socialist bent, with the biggest examples being Social Security and Medicare, both of of which are grossly unconstitutional, since Congress lacks the "power" to create or manage them.
But I digress.
Who cares if a municipality wishes to implement LOCAL policies and programs that emulate the "Workers' Paradise"? What if a city wants to build a large number of apartments or houses with city funds and make them available to the citizenry at a minimal cost? So what? What if a city wants to open a chain of supermarkets to operate at - or below - cost, so that the local citizens can buy food at the lowest possible cost? And so on.
Why would that matter to anyone who is not living in that city and/or paying its taxes? As long as MY Federal or State taxes are not subsidizing those programs, they should be free to do whatever they want, as long as they don't step on the guidelines of the U.S. Constitution. I may think that those supermarkets are a stupid, counterproductive idea, but to me it's just entertainment, like watching professional sports.
I don't understand all the fretting about these "Democratic Socialists" getting elected in municipalities around the country.
What I see as a valid concern is the D-S candidates who are getting elected to Congress, and the similar people - usually hiding their personal ideologies - who are being nominated and appointed to the Federal courts. That's where it becomes a problem. As for cities, WGAF?
Are the states obligated to pay the pensions of the city workers in the event of a big blue shit hole's financial collapse?
jacksonlamb
Platinum Member
- Feb 3, 2026
- 7,835
- 3,806
- 893
Even in this Court's balance, Monk's Eye is not upheld.
0311
Diamond Member
IF the child is attending private religious institution, there is no violation of the Constitution. How ever if that child is attending a private secular school, the separation of church is still upheld. A secular school is by definition secular and no religious preference taught, then the separation of church and state is upheld. He makes a shallow argument.
jacksonlamb
Platinum Member
- Feb 3, 2026
- 7,835
- 3,806
- 893
Yes, he does. Very shallow.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
And the numbers are in .Millions have died due to president trump defunding of usaid- Started by Deplorable Yankee
- Replies: 3
-
Zone1 Is it Okay to Act Like Israel and Target Hateful People- Started by Dante
- Replies: 0
-
-
Mora Knife 510C is Available Again.... You gotta get you one of these!
- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 1
-
