Multiple Reports of Vote Fraud

[d0gbreath]

That year we found out we have way too many liberal judges.

What's a poor Russian to do?

 

[braalian]

Twitter is not “reports”

 

[Mac-7]

You also can't say whether leprechauns hid inside the machine and changed your votes to "President Lucky Charms".

What you are doing is preparing your brain to be brainwashed thoroughly. And very willingly so. Such backwards, anti intellectual thinking... and so proud of it...

Throw away the mail in ballots and electronic voting machines, vet every voter for citizenship, and require a picture id at the polling place on election day and you can eat ALL the Lucky Charms yourself with my blessing

 

[lennypartiv]

So...we could see a repeat of 2020?

 

[lafayette]

We have a very set of voting systems. If your side does not vote in numbers, it does not win. No evidence of systemic voting fraud has ever been discovered.

 

[JohnDB]

It's being addressed. However, I have a hunch that some people will never be happy about the methods, if their candidate loses.

I understand that...
But the transparency is the thing.

Accuracy in vote counts is not to prove the winner but to the loser that they lost.

That must be done with transparency.

 

[JohnDB]

Twitter is not “reports”

But a sitting Senator broadcasting those claims most definitely is a report.

 

[JohnDB]

We have a very set of voting systems. If your side does not vote in numbers, it does not win. No evidence of systemic voting fraud has ever been discovered.

That is no longer true.

 

[para bellum]

That's not what was portrayed in the OP dumb ass. Did you even look at the OP?

Those were not "ballots". They were ballot images from the tabulators. They were handed over to VoterGA under court order. They are legitimate ballot images from the tabulators.

The tabulator number, batch number, and sequence number make up the file name for each image. There were 3400 instances of the same ballot being counted 2 or 3 times- same ballot, multiple scans. Those tabulator totals were counted.

 

[para bellum]

How can a glitch in a program be considered voter fraud when all they are doing is testing the machine to make sure it is running to standards?

The logic and accuracy tests should have been completed weeks ago. We are in early voting now.

The switched votes are being done by ballot marking devices. Those are the machines that use a touch screen to cast the vote, and they print out a ballot which is later run through a tabulator.

If the BMD's are misprinting ballots, that is an obvious problem. It was the voters that brought this to the attention of the election officials when they reviewed their printed ballots.

 

[BULLDOG]

After what happened in 2020?

Especially after what happened in 2020. You need to somehow come to terms with the reality that trump lied to you. The election wasn't stolen.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

That's the ONLY way Democrats can win. After-all they have an IDIOT Kamala trying to run for Prez...

 

[BULLDOG]

Clearly the OP isn't as well informed as I am.

Got it. You're off on another fantasy that only makes sense in your head. Enjoy our trip.

 

[BULLDOG]

It is very difficult to know if the electronic voting machine I use had been tampered with or not

Nor can I say for sure that my vote was not canceled out by an illegal mail in ballot

It's difficult for you to accept the fact that your vote is secure. If I believed all those crazy conspiracy theories, I would probably be doubtful too.

 

[BULLDOG]

Those were not "ballots". They were ballot images from the tabulators. They were handed over to VoterGA under court order. They are legitimate ballot images from the tabulators.

The tabulator number, batch number, and sequence number make up the file name for each image. There were 3400 instances of the same ballot being counted 2 or 3 times- same ballot, multiple scans. Those tabulator totals were counted.

The OP indicated they were legitimate ballots, but didn't document the claim. Who determined there were 3400 ballots that were copies not caught by in place precautions? All this and more has to be known before you can say the op is a legitimate representation of reality.

 

[para bellum]

The OP indicated they were legitimate ballots, but didn't document the claim. Who determined there were 3400 ballots that were copies not caught by in place precautions? All this and more has to be known before you can say the op is a legitimate representation of reality.

It is all documented in VoterGA's legal pages, court filings, etc. There are several related suits.

Those ballot images were from the 2020 election, they are legit.

After those were revealed, the GA elections dept. deleted over 100K images from the tabulators so they couldn't be examined.

Better to violate federal election laws on retention of records than be exposed for running a fraudulent election...

 

[BULLDOG]

It is all documented in VoterGA's legal pages, court filings, etc. There are several related suits.

Those ballot images were from the 2020 election, they are legit.

After those were revealed, the GA elections dept. deleted over 100K images from the tabulators so they couldn't be examined.

Better to violate federal election laws on retention of records than be exposed for running a fraudulent election...

So, what was the court ruling on whether the election was legitimate

 

[para bellum]

So, what was the court ruling on whether the election was legitimate

The suits were not attempting to overturn the election. Favorito was working to promote integrity in the elections, like has has been doing for decades.

 

[g5000]

Anyone who bleevs anything MTG says is a full-on retard.

 

[BULLDOG]

The suits were not attempting to overturn the election. Favorito was working to promote integrity in the elections, like has has been doing for decades.

The information presented to the court was evaluated according to the law. You know that. What was their actual ruling? You can save your conspiracy theory for why that ruling was made for later, but for now, what did the courts say?