Mueller's Past & Current Tactics Are Catching Up With Him

Hilarious and not a little sad to see you kids defending foreign nationals accused of interference in our election just because of who they are accused of helping.
ACCUSED.

Snowflakes continue to push the hypocritical false belief that anyone who does not embrace their ideology / agenda anyone they can use to their advantage are 'GUILTY Until Proven Innocent' and that the 'Burden of Proof Is on the Accused'.

That tactic blew up in their faces with Kavanaugh.
That tactic has so far blown up in their faces with the President...
...while their attempt to do so has exposed very real evidence of their own crimes.

Another favorite Liberal / Snowflake has also been exposed: The constant projection / accusing others of doing exactly what the Democrats have done / have been caught doing / continue to do and of being who THEY are.

Cases in Point:

Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party were caught and exposed for rigging primaries, cheating in debates, engaging in election fraud, violating Election and Campaign Finance Laws, and, in the end, altering the election by giving Hillary Bernie Sanders' earned Party Nomination ... yet continue to claim the Russians interfered in / attempted to alter the 2016 election.

Hillary Clinton was exposed to have illegally coordinated with and paid foreign spies and Russians for Russian-authored propaganda ... yet Democrats / snowflakes insist without substantiating evidence that it was President Trump who did what Hillary did.

Russians successfully ran a counter-intelligence operation using US Social Media and got Democrats / Snowflakes to ORGANIZE and even MARCH for them...successfully paid WILLING snowflakes to spread racial tension and violence across the United States...yet claim that Conservatives defend and have worked for / with Russians.

Snowflakes continue to prove the established fact that they are emotionally- driven / manipulated individuals who irrationally defend themselves and their politicians' actions, rabidly ignoring the evidence while irrationally and without substantiating evidence to hypocritically accuse others.

So every time you and your fellow snowflakes call anyone else 'Comrade', attack / accuse Trump, and make such ridiculous posts as this one, I hear, "yak, yak, yak, hypocritesayswhat...." and laugh.

Meanwhile, Mueller has a documented history of protecting both the Russians and Hillary, supported by testimony under oath and whistleblower evidence, as well as a documented history of both hiding evidence and creating false crimes to send innocent people to jail.

Appointments to any office have nothing to do with Presumption of Innocence. They can be denied that appointment on accusations alone. For example, in the Kavanaugh cause, several people have said that what Kavanaugh said was not true. As a sitting judge, lying to Congress is a serious breach of ethics. Yet Republicans were not interested in finding the truth.

The fact is that no Democrat has been accused of anything and this is a Republican DOJ. Sessions was a Republican and he reminded you people that you need proof.

Your cases in point are bullshit.

Hillary Clinton got 54% to Sanders 42%, How do you earn the nomination by getting only 42%? The DNC backed Clinton in 2008 yet Obama still won the nomination. You keep talking about rigged primaries yet when asked to provide proof you never do. Put up or shut up.

There is no evidence Clinton broke any laws. She paid for opposition research. The Trump campaign in at least 1 instance met with a Russian who promised dirt on Clinton.

Russians bought social media ads in tossup states for Trump. Russians hacked the DNC server and released fake information with real e-mails. Roger Stone knew that Podesta's hacked e-mails would be released on WikiLeaks before they were released.

The fact is that you ignore what Trump has done and you launch unsubstantiated attacks on others. You laugh because you are stupid and you have your tongue up Trump's ass.

There is no evidence of anything of the kind. You believe any garbage that is spoken about Mueller because you apparently are worried about what he has. I am willing to wait and see what he has come up with. I have no issues with Mueller.
 
So far your Russian loving lawyer has lost in the court trial and on his appeals for this case...

We'll see if the SC takes the case, and then, if he loses again....
Another great example of a projecting hypocritical snowflake executing the very tactics just talked about...

A snowflake accuses a lawyer doing his job of being a Russian / being Russian-loving simply because his client who happens to be Russians.

By that Logic, any defense attorney who defends ACCUSED murderers, rapists, thieves, of hookers IS one of those / is a murderer/rapists/thieves/hookers-lover.

You just can't fix THAT kind of 'stupid'.

He wants to do his job for mother Russia then he is a Commie. You are the stupid one.
 
Appointments to any office have nothing to do with Presumption of Innocence.

REALLY?!

So the Democrats executing their 'Politics of Personal Destruction' against both Herman Cain and especially Brett Kavanaugh, who they proclaimed to be 'Guilty Until Proven Innocent' and that the 'Burden of Proof' was on him, the accused, had nothing to do with the fact that the Democrats personally hated / hate Trump, immediately vowed at the time it was announced he won in 2016 that they were all 100% committed to )Obstructing anything and everything he tried to do, and that the Democrats were / are against any more Conservatives on the USSC because they see that as a failure to impose / enforce their ideology on the country through activist judges?

Bwuhahahahaha....

You are SO full of shit!
 
So far your Russian loving lawyer has lost in the court trial and on his appeals for this case...

We'll see if the SC takes the case, and then, if he loses again....
Another great example of a projecting hypocritical snowflake executing the very tactics just talked about...

A snowflake accuses a lawyer doing his job of being a Russian / being Russian-loving simply because his client who happens to be Russians.

By that Logic, any defense attorney who defends ACCUSED murderers, rapists, thieves, of hookers IS one of those / is a murderer/rapists/thieves/hookers-lover.

You just can't fix THAT kind of 'stupid'.

He wants to do his job for mother Russia then he is a Commie. You are the stupid one.

Yup, you can't fix that much 'stupid'. I think Gruber had found his 'poster child'.

:p
 
She paid Russians for Dirt on Trump, and lied about it.
She illegally laundered her and Obama's and DNC money through The Podesta Group, to COIE lawfirm, to FUSION GPS and then on to British and Russian Foreign Agents.
She lied about classified email on her server.
She knowingly submitted False Russian Propaganda to John McCain and John Kerry to hand deliver to their socialist sycophants in The FBI and DOJ to start a Fake Witch Hunt.
She lied about the number of unsecured electronic devices she had, stating she only used one , when she purposely bought 17 "burner devices" that she destroyed with a ballpeen hammer.
She destroyed 33,000 government documents in violation of Two Federal Court orders with The Permission of James Comey to commit those felonies.
She committed over 150 Felonies, yet was never charged with a single crime despite THE FBI stating categorically that she had committed crimes.
And lastly she was exonerated months before even being interviewed, was bestowed upon her by James Comey the Free Get out of Jail Card, as was her entire staff when she was given immunity and then never had one shred of her interview recorded, notated upon in any shape or fashion. She was presented all the evidence against her before she was asked a single question, and then was granted immunity when she was fully made aware of all the crimes The FBI uncovered that she had committed.

And lastly, she was let off the hook by James Comey with a new and never before in existence standard of "Too Stupid Too Be President" and "Too Stupid to Know She Committed Crimes."
 
The thing is, libs have abandoned all pretense to care about due process and the rights of defendants to a fair trial.

For a liberal anything that gets them there is fine like Harry Reid's Senate rule change. They're fine with it until it gets used against them later on.

Jo
 
No they are not dumbass. Check this thread in a year if you want confirmation.
So, you'll have evidence to support your claim....in another year?!

Sounds like what Democrats / snowflakes are saying about the President....

Bwuhahahahaha....... :lmao:
 
Mueller's Past & Current Tactics Are Catching Up With Him

No they are not, you are just a gullible dumbass.

Check this thread in a year for proof on both counts.

Indeed....yeah. However information is pouring in from more than one direction that the Fed bench judges have become leary of Mueller's tactics in general. If he loses this one it could be a big turn around in the way the court system treats him.

Jo
 
Mueller's Past & Current Tactics Are Catching Up With Him

No they are not, you are just a gullible dumbass.

Check this thread in a year for proof on both counts.

Indeed....yeah. However information is pouring in from more than one direction that the Fed bench judges have become leary of Mueller's tactics in general. If he loses this one it could be a big turn around in the way the court system treats him.

Jo

Ohh, leary in general are they? :rolleyes:

What are they going to do exactly? NOT consider merrits of the case in front of them impartially?

Maybe go the way of this guy?

U.S. judge apologizes to prosecutors in former Trump aide Manafort's trial | Reuters


This is nothing but fluff. Mueller is going to win or loose in the court of law on the strengh of the case, not general feelings about him or the investigation.
 
Last edited:
No dumbass, if in a year nothing catches up to Mueller then abviously this thread's OP is bullshit.
But his past has already caught up with him. His documented history of unethical, immoral, illegal, prosecutorial misconduct has been revealed, exposed, reported....

...but let me guess, you are going to try to move the proverbial goal posts by declaring - according to you - that 'catch up with him' means he is legally held accountable, as in indicted, and demand that everyone adopt and adhere to YOUR definition of 'catch up with' because YOU say so.

Bwuhahahahaha........

:lmao:
 
Ohh, leary in general are they? :rolleyes:What are they going to do exactly? NOT consider merrits of the case in front of them impartially?
A USSC Justice, watching Mueller's continued unethical prosecutorial conduct, just injected himself into Mueller's investigation without the case being presented to the USSC. That doesn't happen hardly ever..... Mueller's conduct, as pointed out, is getting noticed.
 
Ohh, leary in general are they? :rolleyes:What are they going to do exactly? NOT consider merrits of the case in front of them impartially?
A USSC Justice, watching Mueller's continued unethical prosecutorial conduct, just injected himself into Mueller's investigation without the case being presented to the USSC. That doesn't happen hardly ever..... Mueller's conduct, as pointed out, is getting noticed.

Yea yea, you wake me up when that USSC Justice will turn over all the guilty pleas and convictions Mueller got.
 
No dumbass, if in a year nothing catches up to Mueller then abviously this thread's OP is bullshit.
But his past has already caught up with him.

It did? How? What happened to him? I mean other than him taking the highest profile prosecuratorial case in modern history?
Nice edit of my actual post, in which I say exactly how it has caught up with him, attempting to bolster your own ignorance / strengthen your non-existent case. Next time try to address my entire statement that answers your ignorant question.

We get it - you are an emotionally driven, easily-emotionally- manipulated snowflake who is going to defend Mueller with your last dying breath, despite all the past, historically documented evidence against him.....

Good little snowflake.....well done.
 
Ohh, leary in general are they? :rolleyes:What are they going to do exactly? NOT consider merrits of the case in front of them impartially?
A USSC Justice, watching Mueller's continued unethical prosecutorial conduct, just injected himself into Mueller's investigation without the case being presented to the USSC. That doesn't happen hardly ever..... Mueller's conduct, as pointed out, is getting noticed.

Yea yea, you wake me up when that USSC Justice will turn over all the guilty pleas and convictions Mueller got.
It will never have to reach the USSC, if it happens.
 
No dumbass, if in a year nothing catches up to Mueller then abviously this thread's OP is bullshit.
But his past has already caught up with him.

It did? How? What happened to him? I mean other than him taking the highest profile prosecuratorial case in modern history?
Nice edit of my actual post, in which I say exactly how it has caught up with him, attempting to bolster your own ignorance / strengthen your non-existent case. Next time try to address my entire statement that answers your ignorant question.

Nothing in the remainder of your post has ACTUALLY talked about anything happening to Mueller or his investigation.

Someone saying something or thinking something like you are here is not a deterrent to Mueller. You nuts will keep doing what you do, eating up the false bullshit that you do, while the investigation goes on.
 
Ohh, leary in general are they? :rolleyes:What are they going to do exactly? NOT consider merrits of the case in front of them impartially?
A USSC Justice, watching Mueller's continued unethical prosecutorial conduct, just injected himself into Mueller's investigation without the case being presented to the USSC. That doesn't happen hardly ever..... Mueller's conduct, as pointed out, is getting noticed.
Hey Easy...could you get us a linky...???
 

Forum List

Back
Top